谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Implementation of Point of Care Ultrasound in extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma at a rural hospital in Uganda

Rita Nassanga,Sam Bugeza,Ameda Faith, Irene Kabanda, Harriet Nakiberu, Tadeo Semaganda,Francis Olweny, Roy Nagawa,Aloysius Gonzaga Mubuuke

medrxiv(2023)

引用 0|浏览10
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is a rapid bedside ultrasound examination performed at presentation of a trauma patient whereas the extended FAST (eFAST) examines each hemithorax for the presence of free fluid and air. It is an ‘extension’ of the trauma clinical assessment process and aids rapid diagnosis with an aim of identifying free peritoneal fluid which allows for immediate transfer to theatre or further imaging. FAST can be performed by surgeons, emergency physicians, and paramedics as a screening test to detect post-traumatic pericardial effusion or hemoperitoneum, performed at presentation of a trauma patient. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a point of care ultrasound training in trauma for non-imaging health professionals and evaluate the ability of the trainees to apply the knowledge and skills gained to perform the ultrasound examination among trauma patients. Methods It was a prospective cohort study conducted at Kiwoko hospital, a rural based hospital in Uganda. The study involved developing a curriculum and training of clinicians in point of care ultrasound for trauma patients through didactic lectures and practical sessions as well as assessing them at baseline and thereafter further assessment at three months follow up. Results A total of 19 clinicians were initially enrolled however, 12 were evaluated at baseline and nine were followed up for three months. The median length of time in clinical practice of the clinicians in this study was 11(2-36) months. At baseline, majority of the clinicians correctly identified and named all the anatomical structures pertinent to images obtained in eFAST; sub-xiphoid view 7(58.3%), right upper quadrant view 5(41.7%), left upper quadrant view 6(50.0%), suprapubic view 7(58.3%), thoracic-pleural fluid view 7(58.3%), and thoracic-pneumothorax view 4(33.3%). At follow-up, the clinicians demonstrated acceptable competency in ultrasound technique when performing eFAST in most views assessed. However, compared to the baseline observation, a statistically significant decline (p=0.001) in image quality was noted in evaluation of organs in the left upper quadrant. Conclusion Clinicians generally demonstrated acceptable competency in performing eFAST assessment in trauma patients. With more training, frequent hands-on practice, regulation and adequate supervision, clinicians can ably perform eFAST procedures to aid in management of trauma patients. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. ### Funding Statement Yes ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Not Applicable The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: School of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Not Applicable I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Not Applicable I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Not Applicable All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要