Channelized hotelling observer-based low-contrast detectability on the ACR CT accreditation phantom: Part II. Repeatability study

BackgroundObjective and quantitative evaluation for low-contrast detectability that correlates with human observer performance is lacking for routine CT quality control testing. Channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) is considered a strong candidate to fill the need but has long been deemed impractical to implement due to its requirement of a large number of repeated scans in order to provide accurate and precise estimates of index of detectability (d'). In our previous work, we optimized a CHO model observer on the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom and achieved accurate measurement of d' with only 1-3 repeat scans. PurposeIn this work, we aim to validate the repeatability of the proposed CHO-based low-contrast evaluation on four scanner models using the ACR CT accreditation phantom. MethodsThe repeatability test was performed on four different scanners from two major CT manufacturers: Siemens Force and Alpha; Canon Prism and Prime SP. An ACR CT phantom was scanned 10 times, each time after repositioning of the phantom. For each repositioning, 3 repeated scans were acquired at 24, 12, and 6 mGy on all four scanner models. CHO was applied at the measured dose levels for different low-contrast object sizes (4-6 mm). The CHO was also applied to images created using deep learning-based reconstructions on Canon Prism and to four different scan/reconstruction modes on the Siemens Alpha, a photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT. The repeatability was evaluated by the probability that a measurement would fall within the +/- 15% tolerance (P<15%). ResultsWith the CHO setting optimized for the ACR phantom and the use of 3 repeated scans and 9 non-overlapping slices per scan, the CHO measurement could provide high repeatability with P<15% of 98.8%-99.9% at 12 mGy with IR reconstruction on all four scanners. On scanner A, P<15% were 91.5%-99.9% at the three dose levels and for all three object sizes while the numbers were 93.6%-99.998% on scanner B. P<15% were 96.5%-97.2% for the two deep learning reconstructions and 97.0%-99.97% for the four scan/reconstruction modes on the PCD-CT. ConclusionThe CHO provided highly repeatable measurements with over 95% probability that a CHO measurement would lie within the +/- 15% tolerance for most of the dose levels and object sizes on the ACR phantom. The repeatability was maintained when the CHO was applied to images created with a commercial deep learning-based reconstruction and various scan/reconstruction modes on a PCD-CT. This study demonstrates that practical implementation of CHO for routine quality control and performance evaluation is feasible.