Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Pathway for Management of Refractory Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Study from A National Center of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

BACKGROUND:Cardiac arrest remains a critical condition with high mortality and catastrophic neurological impact. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been introduced as an adjunct in cardiopulmonary resuscitation modalities. However, survival with good neurological outcomes remains a major concern. This study aims to explore our early experience with ECPR and identify the factors associated with survival in patients presenting with refractory cardiac arrest. METHODS:A retrospective cohort study analyzing six-year data from a tertiary center, the country reference for ECPR. SETTING:A national center of ECPR. PARTICIPANTS:Adult patients who experienced witnessed refractory cardiopulmonary arrest and were supported by ECPR. INTERVENTIONS:ECPR for eligible patients as per local service protocol. RESULTS:Data from 87 patients were analyzed; of this cohort, 62/87 patients presented with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), and 25/87 presented with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Overall survival to decannulation and hospital discharge rates were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively. Among survivors (n=22), 19 presented with IHCA (30.6%), whilst only 3 survivors presented with OHCA (12%). A total of 15/87 (17%) patients were alive at 6-month follow-up. All survivors had good neurological function assessed as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2. Multivariate logistic regression to predict survival to hospital discharge showed that IHCA was the only independent predictor (Odds Ratio 5.8, p =0.042), however, this positive association disappeared after adjusting for the first left ventricular ejection fraction after resuscitation. CONCLUSION:In this study, the use of ECPR for IHCA was associated with a higher survival to discharge compared to OHCA. This study demonstrated a comparable survival rate to other established centers, particularly for IHCA. Neurological outcomes were comparable in both IHCA and OHCA survivors. However, large multicenter studies are warranted for better under-standing and improving the outcomes.