谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Clinical Management of Lupus in the United States: A Claims-Based Analysis

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism(2024)

引用 0|浏览7
暂无评分
摘要
Objectives: To understand the evaluation and management of patients coded with lupus in the broad clinical community in the United States. Methods: Claims data for diagnoses, procedures, medications, and physician specialties were evaluated for three lupus cohorts [lupus nephritis (LN), systemic lupus erythematosus excluding LN (SLE), and cutaneous lupus erythematosus excluding SLE and LN (CLE)] using the EVERSANA claims databases. Identification of patients was based upon the occurrence of lupus-specific codes, with the requirement that a single patient receive a lupusrelated ICD code twice within a six-month period. Results: Using ICD codes, we were able to identify 28,372 patients coded with LN, 82,744 patients coded with SLE, and 13,920 patients coded with CLE, and subsequently evaluate the journey of patients in each group in the year before and after being coded as having a diagnosis of lupus. For the three lupus cohorts, the basis of diagnosis was not always apparent, as clinical features of lupus were not often obtained, autoantibody testing was not usual, biopsies were uncommon and subspecialty involvement was not routine. In addition, a significant increase in laboratory testing, non-lupus diagnoses, emergency department visits and cost during the year before receiving a lupus code suggested uncertainty in disease recognition. Nevertheless, these patients received two separate lupus coding events within a six-month period, supporting a sustained or repeated diagnosis of lupus by the evaluating clinicians. When compared, the three lupus cohorts differed with regard to frequency of laboratory testing, subspecialty care, skin and renal biopsies, and medication management. Moreover, there was an increase in the cost of care of patients coded with lupus compared to a reference patient population both during the year before and after being coded with a diagnosis of lupus. Conclusion: The data present a comprehensive report of the care of patients coded as having a diagnosis of lupus in the United States, including those outside of specialty centers. Despite the unclear basis of diagnosis in some patients, evaluation and management of patients coded as having a diagnosis of lupus in the general care community does not closely follow the recommended guidelines set forth by professional societies.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Claims data,Lupus,Laboratory tests,Medication,Emergency department,Biopsy
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要