• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    A

    AdventHealth Orlando

    EST. 1908
    759论文总数
    6,265引用总数

    Divisions AdventHealth Orlando (formerly Florida Hospital Orlando) is a 1432-bed, faith-based, non-profit, tertiary, research and academic medical center located in Orlando, Florida, servicing Central Florida and the Orange county region. It is the second largest hospital in Florida and largest in Central Florida. AdventHealth Orlando is the region's largest academic university-level teaching center. AdventHealth Orlando is the oldest Seventh-day Adventist Hospital in the state of Florida. The hospital is owned by AdventHealth and is the largest hospital in the system. AdventHealth Orlando is affiliated with the AdventHealth University. AdventHealth Orlando also features an adult and pediatric emergency department and has a helipad to handle medevac patients. Attached to the medical center is the AdventHealth For Children that treats infants, children, adolescents, and young adults up to the age of 21. On January 2, 2019, Adventist Health System and Florida Hospital Orlando rebranded to AdventHealth.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Shyam S. Varadarajulu
    Shyam S. Varadarajulu
    Center for Advanced Endoscopy, Research & Education, Orlando Health Digestive Health Institute;College of Medicine, University of Central Florida
    论文:25引用:0H-index:0
    Ji Young Bang
    Ji Young Bang
    College of Natural Science, Hoseo University
    论文:21引用:0H-index:0
    Muhammad Hasan
    Muhammad Hasan
    Aleppo University
    论文:20引用:0H-index:0
    Louzon Patricia R
    Louzon Patricia R
    Department of Pharmacy, AdventHealth Orlando
    论文:20引用:0H-index:0
    Dennis Yang
    Dennis Yang
    Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital
    论文:17引用:0H-index:0
    Amy Carr
    Amy Carr
    Dept Pharm, AdventHlth Orlando
    论文:15引用:0H-index:0
    Aimen Farooq
    Aimen Farooq
    AdventHealth Orlando
    论文:13引用:0H-index:0
    Udayakumar Navaneethan
    Udayakumar Navaneethan
    Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    论文:12引用:0H-index:0
    Gregory J. Riely
    Gregory J. Riely
    David H. Koch Center for Cancer Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    论文:12引用:0H-index:0

    论文(759)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Safety and Feasibility of Same-Day Discharge after Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Aamir Saeed,Umar Hayat, Tessa Herman, Samuel Igbinedion, Leonard Baidoo,Maham Hayat,Faisal Kamal,Sultan Mahmood, Mansour A. Parsi,Mohammad Bilal,Mark Radlinski

    Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an effective treatment for esophageal motility disorders. There is limited data regarding the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge after POEM, and postoperative care lacks standardization. This study aims to assess the data on readmission rate, emergency department (ED) visits, and adverse events between same-day discharge (SDD) and admitted patients after POEM. Several databases were reviewed from inception to October 12, 2025. Outcomes of interest were readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, adverse events, and post-procedural pain. Data were analyzed using a random-effect model. Seven retrospective studies with a total of 637 patients (384 SDD, 253 admitted) were included in the final analysis. There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission rate, OR (95

    2026Surgical Endoscopy(2026)引用:9
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Alliance A221805: Duloxetine to Prevent Oxaliplatin-Induced Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study
    Ellen M Lavoie Smith, Minji Lee, Mary R Scott,Heshan Liu, Shauna Hillman, Tracy Rieken,Rachel Wills, Julian Diaz-Cobo,Selina Chow,Heidi D Finnes, Kathryn Ruddy,Jeffrey Meyerhardt,

    PURPOSE The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II study (Alliance A221805) was to screen two doses of duloxetine for preventing sensory oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). METHODS Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive once daily 30 mg duloxetine, 60 mg duloxetine, or placebo. Eligible participants had stage II to III colorectal cancer and no baseline neuropathy, had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, were age 25 years and older, and received oxaliplatin via one of the following doses and schedules: 85 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks (6 or 12 doses) or 130 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks (4 doses). Duloxetine/placebo was taken once daily beginning day 1 of cycle 1 and continued for 17 weeks. The primary end point, a composite response reflecting sensory OIPN symptom severity and onset, was measured in weeks 19-21 using a validated participant-reported outcome survey assessing extremity numbness, tingling, and pain. Response was defined as a participant-reported highest score of ≤2 (ie, 1 = not at all; 2 = a little) on survey items. To be evaluable for the response end point, eligible participants must have initiated oxaliplatin and submitted ≥1 postbaseline OIPN survey. RESULTS Of the 199 participants (n = 66, 30 mg duloxetine; n = 66, 60 mg duloxetine; n = 67, placebo), 46, 47, and 50 (N = 143, 71.8%), respectively, were evaluable for primary end point analysis based on modified intention-to-treat criteria. Participant mean age was 55.1 years (standard deviation = 10.4). Most were White (n = 113, 80.7%) and male (n = 82, 58.6%). The proportion of responders among those receiving placebo (68.0%) was similar to those receiving duloxetine 30 mg (65.2%) or 60 mg (66.0%). Duloxetine adherence rates, measured via pill counts—30 mg (54%), 60 mg (57%), and placebo (59%) groups—were low (<75%). CONCLUSION Duloxetine is not more promising than placebo for preventing sensory OIPN.

    2026JCO oncology advances(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Medication Reconciliation at Discharge in the Emergency Department: Impact on Readmissions and Drug-Related Errors
    Ted A. Holmes, Kyle Hedquist, Carlen Huhn, Brian Morini
    2026AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Obesity Without Diabetes
    Usman Ali Akbar, Avilash Mondal,Mounica Vorla, Waleed Alruwaili, Jordan Lacoste,Harshith Thyagaturu, Nouman Shafique, Sana Shakeel,Amro Taha,Sudarshan Balla

    The Semaglutide Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes in People With Overweight or Obesity (SELECT) trial demonstrated cardiovascular benefits of semaglutide in patients with obesity without diabetes; however, the real-world effect across multiple glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) agents in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and overweight or obesity without diabetes mellitus remains unknown. We conducted a target trial emulation using data from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (January 1, 2010, to December 1, 2025) in adults aged ≥45 years with established ASCVD (history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or coronary or peripheral revascularization), BMI ≥27 kg/m², and without type 2 diabetes. New initiation of any GLP-1 RA (liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, or exenatide) was compared with no GLP-1 RA use. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization over 5 years, analyzed using Cox proportional hazards and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to account for the competing risk of death. Among 14,844 propensity-matched patients without diabetes (7,422 per group; median age 63 [interquartile range 55 to 71] years; 64% women), GLP-1 RA use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.88; p = 0.003), acute myocardial infarction (subdistribution HR [sHR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.98; p = 0.040), and heart failure hospitalization (sHR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.95; p = 0.028); no significant association was observed for stroke (sHR 0.76; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.10; p = 0.146). Findings were consistent in landmark and age subgroup analyses; a sensitivity analysis including patients with diabetes (N = 31,910 matched pairs) showed similar associations. In conclusion, these real-world findings are broadly directionally consistent with the SELECT trial and provide complementary observational evidence across multiple GLP-1 RA agents in patients with established ASCVD and overweight or obesity without diabetes mellitus, though causal inference cannot be established from observational data alone.

    2026The American journal of cardiology(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5EARLY VERSUS LATE USE OF LACOSAMIDE AS AN ANTISEIZURE MEDICATION IN REFRACTORY STATUS EPILEPTICUS
    Joanna Brennan, Shaunie Miller, Ahmed Ghonim
    2026CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 759 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    AdventHealth合作论文 32
    佛罗里达大学合作论文 22
    佛罗里达中央大学合作论文 22
    阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校合作论文 20
    埃默里大学合作论文 19
    罗玛琳达大学合作论文 18
    温纳贝戈医学中心合作论文 17
    耶鲁大学合作论文 13
    克利夫兰诊所合作论文 13
    华盛顿大学合作论文 13

    机构统计