Abstract Introduction: In RRMM, increasing rates of pt attrition and decreasing durability of responses with each line of therapy (LOT) necessitate early treatment (tx) with the most effective therapies. Immunotherapies that are widely accessible across different MM tx settings have the potential to change the trajectory of RRMM. Teclistamab (Tec), the first approved BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody (BsAb) for heavily pretreated RRMM, provided deep, durable responses in MajesTEC-1, with improved efficacy and safety in earlier LOTs. Daratumumab (Dara), a standard-of-care (SoC) foundational CD38 targeted therapy with direct on-tumor activity, has been shown to deplete immunosuppressive T-cells and expand cytotoxic T-cells, creating an immune-permissive microenvironment for synergistic Tec-mediated killing of MM cells. MajesTEC-3 (NCT05083169) evaluates Tec-Dara vs SoC DPd/DVd in RRMM. We report initial results for this first phase 3 study of BsAb therapy in MM. Methods: Eligible pts had 1-3 prior LOTs including a PI and lenalidomide (Len; pts with 1 prior LOT must have been Len-refractory) with progressive disease (PD) on or after the last LOT. Pts with prior BCMA-directed therapy or refractory to anti-CD38 were excluded; prior anti-CD38 exposure was permitted. Pts were randomized 1:1 to Tec-Dara or DPd/DVd. The Tec-Dara group received 28-day cycles (C) of Tec (1.5 mg/kg QW in C1-2 [C1 preceded by the approved step-up dose schedule]; 3 mg/kg Q2W in C3-6; and 3 mg/kg Q4W in C7+) with Dara; steroids were not required after C1 Day 8. Tec and Dara dosing were aligned with the approved Dara schedule. DPd/DVd were administered per approved schedules. Progression-free survival (PFS) by IRC was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included complete response or better (≥CR), overall response, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10–5; next-generation sequencing), overall survival (OS), time to worsening of symptoms (MySIm-Q), and safety. Results: 587 pts were randomized (Tec-Dara, n=291; DPd/DVd, n=296). Median (range) age was 64 (25-88) yrs, median number of prior LOTs was 2 (1-3). With 34.5-mo median follow-up, Tec-Dara significantly improved PFS vs DPd/DVd (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.12-0.23; P<0.0001); mPFS was NR and 18.1 mo, and 36-mo PFS rate was 83.4% and 29.7%, respectively. PFS benefit was consistent across all prespecified and clinically relevant pt subgroups, including age ≥75 yrs, Len-refractory, high-risk cytogenetics, ≥60% bone marrow plasma cells, soft-tissue plasmacytomas, and anti-CD38 exposed. Significantly higher rates of ≥CR (81.8% vs 32.1%; OR, 9.56; 95% CI, 6.47-14.14), overall response (89.0% vs 75.3%; OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.68-4.18), and MRD-negativity (58.4% vs 17.1%; OR, 6.78; 95% CI, 4.53-10.15) were observed with Tec-Dara (P<0.0001). There were 45 deaths with Tec-Dara and 96 with DPd/DVd, primarily due to PD (4.6%; 20.3%). OS significantly favored Tec-Dara (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.65; P<0.0001), including across all prespecified subgroups. The 36-mo OS rates were 83.3% and 65.0%, respectively and >90% of Tec-Dara pts alive at 6 mo were also alive at 30 mo. Median time to worsening of MM symptoms was NR with Tec-Dara vs 39.9 mo with DPd/DVd (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34-0.72; P=0.0002). At data cutoff, 49.4% of pts remained on study tx (Tec-Dara, 71.0%; DPd/DVd, 28.3%). Median tx duration was twice as long with Tec-Dara vs DPd/DVd (32.4 vs 16.1 mo). Frequency of grade 3/4 (Tec-Dara, 95.1%; DPd/DVd, 96.6%) and grade 5 (7.8%; 6.2%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), were comparable (safety set: Tec-Dara, n=283; DPd/DVd, n=290). Serious TEAEs occurred in 70.7% Tec-Dara and 62.4% DPd/DVd pts; tx discontinuations due to TEAEs were low (4.6% vs 5.5%). Any grade infections occurred in 96.5% and 84.1% of Tec-Dara and DPd/DVd pts, respectively; grade 3/4 infections occurred in 54.1% and 43.4%. New onset grade ≥3 infections decreased over time, coinciding with transition to Q4W dosing and supported by antimicrobial and Ig prophylaxis guidance. CRS rate was 60.1% (grade 1/2: 44.2%/15.9%) and ICANS was 1.1% with Tec-Dara. Conclusion: We demonstrate the clinically remarkable and statistically significant PFS and OS benefits of Tec-Dara vs SoC triplets in RRMM, with 83.4% of Tec-Dara pts alive and progression-free at 3 yrs. Infections with Tec-Dara were well managed with established protocols. This highly effective, off-the-shelf, immunotherapy combination represents a new SoC for RRMM as early as first relapse.
This study reports the synthesis of poly-β-cyclodextrin functionalized graphene oxide as an efficient sorbent for PFAS removal from water, offering mechanistic insights into the interactions governing the adsorption.
ObjectivesThis report details a pediatric case of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) characterized by isolated MOG-IgG3 positivity and IgG1 deficiency, highlighting a unique serologic profile and exploring its immunologic significance. In addition, a review of MOGAD cases with isolated MOG-IgG3 antibodies is included.MethodsA 12-year-old boy presenting with a progressive neurologic syndrome underwent clinical, radiologic, and laboratory evaluation.ResultsMRI showed extensive brain and spinal lesions. MOG-IgG3 antibodies were identified in serum and CSF by live cell-based assay, while other MOG-IgG subclasses were not detected. Serum IgG1 was low at baseline and throughout follow-up. First-line immunotherapy treatment led to significant improvement, with no relapses at 2-year follow-up.DiscussionThis case highlights the potential role of subclinical IgG1 deficiency in shaping the predominance or selective detection of MOG-IgG3 in MOGAD. While most MOG antibodies are predominantly of the IgG1 isotype, our review identified a few cases with isolated MOG-IgG3 antibodies. A possible contribution to pathogenesis cannot be excluded, and the patient's inability to produce a balanced IgG subclass profile could have favored a sustained IgG3 response. Larger studies are needed to clarify the clinical significance of MOG-IgG3 in MOGAD.
The differential diagnosis of suspected neoplastic disease involving deep lymph nodes remains challenging, particularly in the abdomen, where biopsies are technically more complex and associated with higher procedural risks. The present retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy in patients with neoplastic disease of deep abdominal lymph nodes. A total of 77 abdominal lymph node biopsies were analyzed. Among them, 15 (19.5%) were non-diagnostic. Of the remaining 62 diagnostic biopsies, 40 (64.5%) were lymphomas, 17 (27.4%) were solid tumors, and 5 (8.1%) were non-neoplastic conditions. Among the 57 biopsies positive for neoplastic disease, 32 of 40 (80.0%) lymphomas and six of 17 (35.3%) solid tumors represented new diagnoses, while the remaining cases were histologically confirmed. No procedure-related adverse events were observed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100, 83.3, 98.2 and 100%, respectively. The overall diagnostic yield was 80.5%, and the diagnostic accuracy reached 98.4%. US-NB could represent an accurate and reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating suspected neoplastic disease of deep abdominal lymph nodes, both at initial diagnosis and at relapse, offering a favorable safety profile and high diagnostic performance.
BackgroundReliable diagnosis is a cornerstone of medical practice, yet concerns about diagnostic reliability have long haunted psychiatry. In the 1970s, the US–UK Diagnostic Project revealed striking international discrepancies in diagnostic practice. Although operationalized diagnostic criteria were introduced to improve reliability, contemporary evidence indicates that substantial problems persist. To investigate this, we conducted a large-scale international study of diagnostic reliability among medical doctors using standardized clinical case vignettes.Material and methodsIn this cross−sectional study, medical doctors working in adult psychiatry across 19 countries from two continents assigned ICD−10 diagnoses to written cases. Each doctor was randomly assigned two of nine available cases. Inter−rater reliability among medical doctors was assessed using Krippendorff’s α. Diagnostic variability at case-level was quantified using Shannon entropy. We also calculated diagnostic accuracy as concordance with predefined best-estimate reference diagnoses.ResultsA total of 1,038 medical doctors provided 1,902 diagnostic assessments across nine cases. Inter−rater reliability among medical doctors was modest (Krippendorff’s α = 0.48), indicating that diagnostic agreement between two doctors occurred in roughly 55% of cases. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 66%, with the lowest accuracy observed for cases depicting schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Diagnostic disagreements followed systematic patterns, with schizophrenia cases frequently misclassified as OCD, personality disorder, or bipolar disorder.ConclusionsDiagnostic inter−rater reliability among medical doctors remains limited, even under standardized conditions. The observed patterns of misclassification suggest that the variability in diagnostic assessments reflects systematic differences in clinical interpretation rather than random error, pointing to challenges in assessing psychopathology as well as ambiguities in psychiatric classification.
