• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    C

    Cancer Institute (WIA)

    1,096论文总数
    2.5万引用总数

    The Cancer Institute (WIA - Womens' Indian Association), also known as the Adyar Cancer Institute, is a non-profit cancer treatment and research centre based in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The Cancer Institute (WIA) was established in the year 1952 under the leadership of Dr. Muthulakshmi Reddy. In 1974, the institute became the Regional Cancer Centre and declared as a "Centre of Excellence" by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Venkatraman Radhakrishnan
    Venkatraman Radhakrishnan
    Department of Medical Oncology, Dr BRA Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital
    论文:83引用:0H-index:0
    Arvind Krishnamurthy
    Arvind Krishnamurthy
    Dept Surg Oncol, Canc Inst WIA
    论文:74引用:0H-index:0
    Anand Raja
    Anand Raja
    Cancer Institute (WIA)
    论文:51引用:0H-index:0
    Sundersingh Shirley
    Sundersingh Shirley
    Department of Surgical Oncology and Department of Oncopathology, Cancer Institute (WIA)
    论文:38引用:0H-index:0
    Trivadi Ganesan
    Trivadi Ganesan
    Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA),
    论文:37引用:0H-index:0
    Rajkumar Thangarajan
    Rajkumar Thangarajan
    Dept Mol Oncol, Canc Inst WIA
    论文:34引用:0H-index:0
    Sagar Tenali Gnana
    Sagar Tenali Gnana
    Department of Medical Oncology (Pediatric Oncology Division) and Biostatistics, Cancer Institute (WIA)
    论文:31引用:0H-index:0
    Manikandan Dhanushkodi
    Manikandan Dhanushkodi
    Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA),
    论文:30引用:0H-index:0
    Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri
    Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri
    Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA),
    论文:26引用:0H-index:0

    论文(1096)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Comparative Assessment of Heavy Metal Exposure and Health Risks in Khaini and Filtered Khaini Smokeless Tobacco Products
    Arun Kumar Sundaragopal,Senthil Murugappan, Sharath Asokan, Shyam Sivasamy, Divyarajprabhakar Subramani, Nalini Sailaja Ilangovan

    Abstract Objectives Smokeless tobacco (SLT) products are widely consumed in India, contributing significantly to the burden of oral cancer and systemic diseases. Despite their popularity, limited data exist on heavy metal contamination and associated health risks, particularly for filtered khaini, which is often perceived as safer than traditional khaini. Thus, the objectives of the study are to quantify heavy metal concentrations in khaini and filtered khaini and evaluate the associated non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks. Study design Samples of filtered khaini (FK) and conventional khaini (K) were analysed for 20 heavy metals using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Mean concentrations were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Estimated daily intake (EDI), hazard quotient (HQ), hazard index (HI), and target cancer risk (TCR) were calculated based on oral (buccal) exposure scenarios at absorption fractions of 6%, 20%, 25%, and 100%. Cancer slope factors (CSFs) were derived from U.S. EPA and WHO databases. Results FK contained significantly higher concentrations (p ≤ 0.05) of Pb, Cd, As, Cr, Ni, Co, Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, Al, Ba, V, Se, U, and Be than khaini. Non-carcinogenic risk assessment at 25% absorption yielded an HI = 1.224 for FK and 0.592 for khaini, indicating potential chronic health effects for the former. The total target cancer risk at 6% absorption was 0.264 for FK and 0.147 for khaini, dominated by arsenic and cadmium contributions. Conclusion FK exhibits markedly higher heavy-metal contamination and health-risk indices than traditional khaini. Both products present lifetime cancer risks far exceeding acceptable limits (10⁻⁶–10⁻⁴), underscoring the need for regulatory surveillance and public-health intervention to mitigate oral and systemic toxicity from smokeless-tobacco use. Graphical Abstract

    2026Discover Public Health(2026)引用:11
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Compassion Fatigue in Oncology Nurse Navigation: Identification and Prevention
    Emily Gentry,Lillie D. Shockney
    2026Team-Based Oncology Care The Pivotal Role of Oncology Navigation(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Cyclophosphamide and Topotecan in Relapsed and Refractory Pediatric Extracranial Solid Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis
    Pragadeesh Thamaraiselvan,Gargi Das, Prasanth Srinivasan, Balaji Thiruvengadam Kothandan,Anand Raja,Venkatraman Radhakrishnan

    To assess the effectiveness and safety of cyclophosphamide and topotecan in children with relapsed or refractory extracranial solid tumors. This study included children with relapsed or refractory extracranial solid tumors treated with cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2/day) and topotecan (0.75 mg/m2/day) for 5 days, 3-weekly, between January 2012 and February 2024. Event-free-survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Eighteen patients with median (range) age 6 (2–13) years (72

    2026Indian Pediatrics(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Esophagocutaneous Fistula: A Rare Complication of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Ethanol Ablation for Recurrent Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Nodal Metastasis.
    Krishnamurthy Arvind, S Pavithra, N Thirumoorthi, Viswa Madesh

    BACKGROUND:Percutaneous ethanol ablation (PEA) is a minimally invasive option for locoregional nodal recurrence in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) when reoperation carries high risk. Esophagocutaneous fistula is an extremely rare complication of this procedure. METHODS:A woman in her early 70s with a history of total thyroidectomy, radical neck dissection, and radioactive iodine therapy developed an isolated left supraclavicular nodal recurrence. Ultrasound-guided PEA was performed. One month later she presented with purulent neck discharge. Contrast-enhanced CT with oral contrast, oesophagoscopy, and subsequent surgical exploration were performed. RESULTS:Imaging and endoscopy confirmed a 2-cm esophagocutaneous fistula tract. The patient was managed with enteral nutrition followed by primary esophageal closure reinforced with a pedicled pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. The postoperative course was complicated by a surgical site infection that resolved with conservative care. Follow-up Gastrografin swallow showed no leak and the patient resumed a full oral diet. CONCLUSIONS:This is the first reported case of esophagocutaneous fistula following cervical PEA. Although this complication appears exceptionally rare, awareness and preventive strategies are particularly important in previously operated and irradiated necks. Prompt imaging and multidisciplinary surgical repair are essential for successful outcomes.

    2026Head & neck(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5WSES–PSOGI–SICO Evidence-Infomed Guidelines on Surgical Emergencies in Patients with Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: a Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Structured Expert Consensus
    Paola Fugazzola,Stefano Granieri,Fikri Abu-Zidan,Niccolò Allievi,Walter L. Biffl,Fausto Catena, Andrea Celotti,Marco Ceresoli,Lorenzo Cobianchi,Federico Coccolini, Andrea Dagnoni,Francesca Dal Mas,

    Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) are primary or secondary neoplastic deposits involving the peritoneum and are commonly associated with colorectal, gastric, appendiceal, gynecological, pancreaticobiliary, and other intra-abdominal or extra-abdominal cancers. Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is one of the most frequent and clinically consequential emergency presentations in this population, yet diagnostic and therapeutic pathways remain heterogeneous. We aimed to develop evidence-informed recommendations for emergency management of MBO in patients with PSM by integrating a systematic review, meta-analysis and a structured international expert consensus process. This systematic review, meta-analysis, and Delphi consensus followed PRISMA, Cochrane, and relevant MOOSE reporting principles. PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 2025 (English language). Five predefined PICO/PIRT questions addressed: (1) the diagnostic role of CT, plain abdominal X-ray, or Gastrografin-enhanced X-ray in PSM-related MBO; (2) nonoperative medical management versus surgical or endoscopic therapy; (3) surgical versus endoscopic treatment after failure of nonoperative management; (4) bowel resection versus stoma or bypass in surgical candidates; and (5) endoscopic stenting versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided bypass with lumen-apposing metal stents in endoscopic candidates. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I for comparative non-randomized studies and MINORS for non-comparative studies; certainty of evidence was rated with GRADE. Random-effects meta-analyses (REML) produced odds ratios (OR), mean differences (MD), pooled means, or pooled proportions with 95

    2026World Journal of Emergency Surgery(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 1096 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    All India Institute of Medical Sciences合作论文 31
    宾夕法尼亚州立大学合作论文 28
    塔塔纪念医院合作论文 23
    美国国家卫生研究院合作论文 23
    纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心合作论文 22
    德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校合作论文 22
    希望之城国家医疗中心合作论文 15
    密歇根大学合作论文 15
    约翰霍普金斯医学院合作论文 14
    亚利桑那大学合作论文 12

    机构统计