BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Evidence regarding the influence of vedolizumab (VDZ) on extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. Our aim was to analyze the effectiveness of VDZ in preexisting EIMs and the occurrence of de novo EIMs during VDZ therapy for IBD. METHODS:This observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients from the Spanish ENEIDA registry. All EIMs were assessed at baseline, and clinical response and worsening of IBD and EIMs were evaluated at 3 and 12 months after VDZ initiation, according to the physician's assessment. RESULTS:We retrospectively identified 551 patients with IBD treated with VDZ. At baseline, 133 patients (24.1%) had preexisting EIMs, with 77 having active EIMs. At 3 months, 29.9% of these patients showed clinical improvement, 16.9% experienced worsening, and 53.2% remained unchanged. Clinical response of IBD at 3 months was the only factor associated with EIM improvement (OR 3.72; 95% CI 1.08-12.83). Among 56 patients with inactive EIMs at baseline, 13.5% experienced worsening after 12 months. During follow-up, 25 patients (4.5%) developed 27 de novo EIMs. The presence of 2 preexisting EIMs was the only factor associated with de novo EIM onset (OR 16.2; 95% CI 4.3-60.9). Worsening of preexisting EIMs or de novo EIMs led to VDZ discontinuation in 15 patients (5.8% of all patients who discontinued VDZ and 2.7% of the entire cohort). CONCLUSIONS:VDZ achieved clinical response of active EIMs in nearly one-third of patients after 3 months. Although infrequent, VDZ may exacerbate inactive EIMs and induce de novo EIMs during therapy, potentially leading to treatment discontinuation.
BACKGROUND:Although mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is an effective treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO) with a high successful recanalization rate, MT failure (MTF) occurs in 10-15% of cases and is associated with unfavorable outcomes. However, little is known about the clinical, technical, and radiological reasons for MTF. We investigated the technical factors associated with MTF. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with anterior LVO prospectively included in the ongoing observational multicenter ROSSETTI registry. Patients were categorized according to the success (≥mTICI 2b) or failure (<mTICI 2b) of the MT procedure. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, endovascular MT techniques, and angiographic and clinical outcomes were compared. Multivariate analysis for prediction of MTF was performed. RESULTS:We analyzed 4135 patients, including 325 patients (7.9%) with MTF. Patients in the MTF group had a significantly lower Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) at baseline (8 (7-10) vs 9 (8-10)), longer time since last time seen well (279 min vs 262 min), increased MT procedure time (76 min vs 31 min), higher rate of complications (23% vs 4%), higher symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (21% vs 7.9%), higher 24 hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (19 vs 6), worse functional outcome at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2, 15.6% vs 53%), and higher mortality (45% vs 20%). Four or more passes were an independent predictor of MTF (OR 3.46, 95% CI 2.58 to 4.63; P<0.001). None of the endovascular techniques demonstrated a higher likelihood of MTF. CONCLUSION:In this study, MTF in anterior circulation LVO was associated with a high complication rate and worse outcomes.
Preventing exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a priority, as exacerbations accelerate progression, increase mortality, and impair quality of life. The use of biologics that act on specific inflammatory pathways through monoclonal antibodies in COPD offers a precision medicine strategy for high-risk patients who continue to experience frequent exacerbations despite optimal inhaled treatment. However, the use of these biologic therapies in COPD presents significant challenges, stemming from the clinical heterogeneity of the disease and the limited evidence available. Their indication and management must be personalized and precise, raising questions about how to implement a biologic therapy strategy in COPD in clinical practice. This clinical protocol focused on the use of biologic therapy in COPD sets out the objectives ("Why"), describes the selection of candidates ("In which patients"), the monitoring of response ("What should be measured") and how to implement it in clinical practice ("How") based on the available evidence and expert consensus.
