• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    D

    Düsseldorf University Hospital

    EST. 1907
    3,692论文总数
    4万引用总数

    The University Hospital of Düsseldorf (German: Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf) is located in the south of Düsseldorf, the state capital of the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia and center of the populous Rhine-Ruhr metropolitan region. It treats approximately 45,000 inpatients and 300,000 outpatients every year in 32 clinics and 34 institutes. The hospital has more than 1,200 inpatient beds. It has roughly 5,500 employees, including 1,300 nurses and 800 physicians. Many facilities are self-operated (crafts, training centers). The board consists of the medical director, the commercial director, the director of nursing and the dean of the medical faculty..

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    论文(3692)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Efficacy and Safety of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for the Curative Treatment of Extracranial Primary Tumors: A Collaborative Systematic Review on Behalf of the SBRT Focus Group of the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO)
    Francesco Cuccia,Ciro Franzese,Suraiya Dubash,Valeria Dionisi,Thomas Brunner,Francesco Cellini, Juliane Hörner-Rieber,Thomas Zilli,Bartłomiej Tomasik,Dirk Verellen,Stephanie Tanadini-Lang,Marta Scorsetti

    Single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SF-SBRT) represents one of the most advanced frontiers in modern radiation oncology. While ultra-hypofractionation has entered everyday clinical practice in different fields of the oncological care, curative treatments in one session are increasingly attractive for the potential favorable combination of logistic advantages with safety and clinical outcomes.This collaborative systematic review promoted by the ESTRO SBRT Focus Group in participation with members of different disease-site Focus Groups collects the available data in support of SF-SBRT for the curative treatment of the main extracranial primary tumors.The findings highlight that, for specific anatomical sites, SF-SBRT is both safe and effective though the results emphasize the critical importance of careful patient selection and mandatory technological requirements for treatment planning and delivery.This collaborative work provides a comprehensive overview of current evidence and identifies key knowledge gaps for future investigation and upcoming clinical trials.

    2027Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology(2027)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Conducting a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on Palliative Care in Patients with Glioblastoma – What Are the Challenges?
    Melanie Joshi,Charlotte Nettekoven, Sophia Kochs,Iris Appelmann,Claudia Bausewein,Gerhild Becker,Christopher Boehlke, Tzvetina Brumbarova, Daniele Civello,Hans Clusmann,Roland Goldbrunner, Birgit Haberland,

    Patients with glioblastoma represent a highly vulnerable cohort as they often experience rapid health deterioration with severe symptom burden including neurological, (neuro)psychological, and psychiatric symptoms. The aim of this sub-analysis of the “Early Palliative Care for Patients with Glioblastoma” (EPCOG) trial was to investigate the specific challenges of conducting a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial in glioblastoma patients testing a specialized palliative care (PC) intervention. We analyzed screening protocols and protocol deviations with respect to number and reasons for non-participation, skipped/delayed visits and attrition using descriptive statistics and content analysis of free-text comments. In total, 41.5

    2026Supportive Care in Cancer(2026)引用:43
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3PRIMA: Randomized Prospective Multicenter Non-Inferiority Study for Primary Diagnosis of Clinically Significant PRostate Cancer by PSA and MR IMAging—study Protocol for a Randomized Diagnostic Accuracy Trial
    Rouvier Al-Monajjed,Peter Albers, Matthias Boschheidgen,Jan Philipp Radtke, Johanna Droop,Axel Benner,Boris Hadaschik,Gerald Antoch, Lars Schimmöller

    Abstract Background Diagnostic pathways based on PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), and systematic biopsy (SB) may miss clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and lead to overdiagnosis of indolent disease. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) improve detection of csPCa; however, the additional diagnostic value of routine SB in biopsy-naïve men with suspicious MRI findings remains controversial. Methods PRIMA is a randomized, prospective, multicenter non-inferiority diagnostic accuracy trial in eight German hospitals. Biopsy-naïve men aged 50–75 years with PSA ≥ 3 ng/ml and/or suspicious DRE undergo mpMRI (PI-RADS v2.1, PI-QUAL v2). Men with PI-RADS 4–5 or PI-RADS 3 with PSA density > 0.15 are randomized 1:1 to TB only (Arm A) or TB + SB (Arm B). Persistent PI-RADS 4–5 lesions with negative biopsy undergo MRI in-bore biopsy. Outcomes Co-primary endpoints are csPCa (ISUP ≥ 2) detection and detection of clinically insignificant cancer (ISUP 1). Secondary endpoints include patient-reported outcomes (EORTC-QLQ-C30, EPIC-26, VAS), biopsy-related complications, biopsy approach, MRI in-bore yield, AI/radiomics validation and follow-up cancer incidence. Sample size One thousand nine hundred eight men were allocated to achieve 1590 analyzable patients (> 80% power; non-inferiority margin δ = 13%). Discussion PRIMA will provide high-level evidence whether systematic biopsy can be safely omitted in MRI-positive biopsy-naïve men, potentially reducing diagnostic morbidity and overtreatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04993508. Registered on 2 December 2022.

    2026Trials(2026)引用:22
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Beyond the Protocol: Adherence to ECPR Selection Criteria and Outcomes after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (Ohca)-Insights from the German Cardiac Arrest Registry (G-CAR).
    A. Springer, M. Rossberg, C. Sinning, I. Voigt, A. Freund, N. Hösler, G. Michels, S. Ewen, F. Voss, P. Wohlmuth, H. Thiele, U. Zeymer,

    Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a potential treatment for selected patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) emphasize the importance of appropriate patient selection. Expert consensus statements recommend six criteria for ECPR suitability: age ≤ 75 years, witnessed OHCA, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), no-flow time ≤ 5 min (min), low-flow time ≤ 60 min, and an initial shockable rhythm. Although widely accepted, these items are not supported by robust data and adherence varies greatly. We present an analysis from the German Cardiac Arrest Registry (G-CAR) describing the current state of ECPR across participating centers. Of 1,644 patients in G-CAR, 576 patients (34.6

    2026Clinical Research in Cardiology(2026)引用:20
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Opening Pandora’s Box
    Jane W. Chan, Philipp Albrecht, Robert C. Sergott, Gordon T. Plant
    2026Neuroretina(2026)引用:14
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 3692 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    海德堡大学医院合作论文 194
    汉堡 - 埃彭多夫大学医学中心合作论文 184
    海因里希·海涅大学(杜塞尔多夫)合作论文 180
    乌尔姆大学医院合作论文 174
    埃森大学医院合作论文 160
    柏林夏里特大学医学院合作论文 154
    科隆大学医院合作论文 154
    汉诺威医学院合作论文 135
    明斯特大学医院合作论文 131
    波恩大学医院合作论文 126

    机构统计