• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    E

    Ehime University Hospital

    923论文总数
    1万引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Riko Kitazawa
    Riko Kitazawa
    Ehime University
    论文:89引用:0H-index:0
    Hiroaki Araki
    Hiroaki Araki
    Ehime University School of Medicine, Ehime University Hospital
    论文:78引用:0H-index:0
    Yoichi Hiasa
    Yoichi Hiasa
    Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University
    论文:76引用:0H-index:0
    Akihiro Tanaka
    Akihiro Tanaka
    Division of Pharmacy, Ehime University Hospital
    论文:50引用:0H-index:0
    Shinya Furukawa
    Shinya Furukawa
    Health Services Center, Ehime University
    论文:43引用:0H-index:0
    Eiji Takeshita
    Eiji Takeshita
    Dept Inflammatory Bowel Dis & Therapeut, Ehime Univ
    论文:41引用:0H-index:0
    Yoshio Ikeda
    Yoshio Ikeda
    Endoscopy Center, Ehime University Hospital
    论文:39引用:0H-index:0
    Yasunori Yamamoto
    Yasunori Yamamoto
    Endoscopy Center, Ehime University Hospital
    论文:37引用:0H-index:0
    Teruki Miyake
    Teruki Miyake
    Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University
    论文:35引用:0H-index:0

    论文(925)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Therapeutic Outcomes and Prognostic Predictors of Endoscopic Resection for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients Aged ≥ 80 Years: a Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Wataru Kurihara,Yusuke Horiuchi,Yasunori Yamamoto,Shogo Kitahata,Junki Tokura, Naoki Miyazaki, Masanori Abe,Yoshio Ikeda,Yoichi Hiasa,Junko Fujisaki

    Endoscopic resection (ER) is the standard treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, in patients aged ≥ 80 years, ER has limited long-term benefits owing to the higher mortality risk from other diseases. We assessed the therapeutic outcomes and prognostic predictors of ER in patients with ESCC aged ≥ 80 years at three institutions. Patient characteristics and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. This study included 161 patients with 161 lesions. The median patient age was 82 years. Patient characteristics included a median Brinkman Index (BI) of 570, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) class 0–1 in 150 patients (93.2

    2026Surgical Endoscopy(2026)引用:26
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Prognostic Value of Pretest Probability of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: an Insight from the CLIDAS-PCI Database
    Tomoaki Nishikawa,Shunsuke Tamaki,Kazuhisa Nishimura, Yasutaka Ihara,Akinori Higaki,Hiroshi Kawakami,Katsuji Inoue,Shuntaro Ikeda,Osamu Yamaguchi, Naoyuki Akashi,Takahide Kohro,Tomoyuki Kabutoya,

    Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major risk factor for the development of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and is associated with increased mortality. However, an optimal strategy to screen for HFpEF among patients with CAD has not yet been established. The HFpEF-ABA score was introduced to estimate the pretest probability of HFpEF and was shown to predict adverse HF events. This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients registered in the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System database who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention from April 2013 to March 2019. Patients with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≥ 50

    2026Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics(2026)引用:25
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Tumors, Vascular Malformations, Lymphatic Malformations, and Lymphangiomatosis 2022
    Yoshiaki Kinoshita,Kosuke Ishikawa,Sadanori Akita, Katsuyoshi Koh,Satoru Sasaki,Masatoshi Jinnin,Hidefumi Mimura,Keigo Osuga,Michio Ozeki, Michiko Nagahama,Akihiro Fujino,Yoko Aoki,

    The objective was to prepare guidelines to perform the current optimum treatment by organizing effective and efficient treatments of hemangiomas and vascular malformations, confirming the safety, and systematizing treatment, employing evidence-based medicine techniques and aimed at improvement of the outcomes. Clinical questions (CQs) were decided based on the important clinical issues. For document retrieval, key words for literature searches were set for each CQ and literature published from 1980 to the end of December 2020 was searched in PubMed, and Japana Centra Revuo Medicina (JCRM). The strengths of evidence and recommendations acquired by systematic reviews were determined following the Medical Information Network Distribution Service (Minds) technique. A total of 38 CQs were used to compile recommendations and the subjects included efficacy of resection, sclerotherapy/embolization, drug therapy, laser therapy, radiotherapy, and other conservative treatment, differences in appropriate treatment due to the location of lesions and among symptoms, appropriate timing of treatment and tests, pathological diagnosis deciding the diagnosis, and causal genes of vascular anomalies. Thus, the Japanese clinical practice guidelines for vascular tumors, vascular malformations, lymphatic malformations, and lymphangiomatosis 2022 have been prepared as the evidence-based guidelines for the management of vascular anomalies.

    2026Surgery Today(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4[Evaluating the Quality of Collaboration in Home-Based Palliative Care for Patients with Terminal Cancer: A Scoping Review].
    Miyuki Yoshida,Kazumi Fujimura, Miyuki Shiomi, Mio Hirose, Airi Fujimoto, Tomoko Nishiyama

    Objectives To integrate and analyze domestic and international literature on interprofessional collaboration (hereafter, collaboration) in home-based palliative care for patients with terminal cancer, and to support the development of the evaluation of indicators of collaboration.Methods Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (via Igaku Chuo Zasshi) were searched using the terms "terminal cancer", "home", "palliative care", "interprofessional", and "indicators". The retrieved literature was thoroughly reviewed, emphasizing descriptions of the content, outcomes, and evaluation of "collaboration". The information obtained was organized according to the Donabedian framework for healthcare quality assessment: Structure (care-supporting resources and systems), Process (collaborative procedures and content), and Outcome (results or changes attributable to collaboration). All processes, from the formulation of the search strategy, to selection and classification of the literature, were conducted through discussion and agreement among the investigators.Results The initial search identified 159 articles (Medline, 16; CINAHL, 10; Cochrane Library, 0; Web of Science via Igaku Chuo Zasshi, 133), of which 150 were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Nine eligible articles were supplemented with 10 articles, yielding 19 articles for analysis. These articles, published between 2001 and 2020, included 13 Japanese and six international studies. The topics included five scale development and validation studies on "collaboration", five qualitative studies identifying "collaboration" indicators, seven studies evaluating initiatives to strengthen "collaboration", and two studies evaluating the introduction of "collaboration" tools. Structure indicators included the care system, team relationships, information sharing, operations, community-based comprehensive collaboration systems, and 24-hour drug supply systems. Process indicators included visualization of the collaboration process, unification of team policies, formation of team trust, active collaborative behaviors by professionals, and educational support to enhance collaborative capacity. Outcome indicators included subjective evaluations from patients, families, and diverse professionals, and objective evaluations based on performance data.Conclusion The Structure, Process, and Outcome indicators identified in this study provide a foundation for developing measures to evaluate and promote collaboration. Future studies should standardize these indicators and assess their relationships with outcome measures to develop evaluation tools that enhance collaboration in clinical practice.

    2026Nihon koshu eisei zasshi Japanese journal of public health(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Diuretic Administration for Vomiting During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
    Naoya Tonomura, Kensuke Yoshida, Hajime Morita, Masaki Nakai, Yusuke Kawamura, Takuma Matsumoto, Yoshinobu Gohara, Naoto Hoshino, Manami Banba, Ayako Yamaguchi, Masaki Tachibana, Tomoki Fukushima,

    BACKGROUND/AIM:Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remain major challenges during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for cervical cancer. Mannitol and furosemide are agents widely used to prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity; however, the differences in their effect on CINV have not been characterized. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of concomitant diuretic administration (mannitol versus furosemide) on the incidence and timing of vomiting in patients with cervical cancer undergoing CCRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS:This multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the impact of concomitant diuretic administration on CINV in 485 patients receiving weekly, cisplatin-based CCRT between 2016 and 2024, including 206 who received mannitol and 279 who received furosemide. RESULTS:Vomiting occurred more frequently in the mannitol group than in the furosemide group (18.4% vs. 10.4%). Time-to-event analysis found that vomiting occurred earlier with mannitol during the entire CCRT course. CONCLUSION:These findings may reflect mannitol's osmotic properties and the increased, intestinal permeability associated with CCRT-related mucosal injury. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest investigation to date comparing diuretic agents in this setting. The results suggested that furosemide may be a more appropriate option for patients with a high risk of CINV.

    2026Anticancer research(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 925 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    爱媛大学合作论文 316
    愛媛県立中央病院合作论文 64
    Saiseikai Matsuyama Hospital合作论文 40
    住友別子病院合作论文 32
    大阪大学合作论文 30
    京都大学合作论文 29
    松山大学合作论文 27
    岡山大学合作论文 26
    Matsuyama Shimin Hospital合作论文 26
    Osaka University Hospital合作论文 21

    机构统计