• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    F

    Faust & Backhaus Environmental Consulting

    企业
    13论文总数
    1,310引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Michael Faust
    Michael Faust
    Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen
    论文:6引用:0H-index:0
    Thomas Backhaus
    Thomas Backhaus
    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg;FRAM - Centre for Future Chemical Risk Assessment and Management Strategies, University of Gothenburg
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    Werner Brack
    Werner Brack
    Faculty of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt;Department of Effect-Directed Analysis, Helmholtz-Zentrum Fur Umweltforschung
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    Rolf Altenburger
    Rolf Altenburger
    Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
    论文:5引用:0H-index:0
    L. Posthuma
    L. Posthuma
    Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen;Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
    论文:4引用:0H-index:0
    John Munthe
    John Munthe
    IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    Jos van Gils
    Jos van Gils
    Deltares
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    Andreas Kortenkamp
    Andreas Kortenkamp
    Department of Life Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London;Institute for the Environment, Brunel University
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0
    Jaroslav Slobodnik
    Jaroslav Slobodnik
    Environmental Institute (EI)
    论文:3引用:0H-index:0

    论文(13)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Effect-based Methods Are Key. the European Collaborative Project SOLUTIONS Recommends Integrating Effect-Based Methods for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Water Quality
    Werner Brack,Selim Ait Aissa,Thomas Backhaus,Valeria Dulio,Beate I. Escher,Michael Faust,Klara Hilscherova,Juliane Hollender,Henner Hollert,Christin Müller,John Munthe,Leo Posthuma,

    The present monitoring and assessment of the chemical status of water bodies fail to characterize the likelihood that complex mixtures of chemicals affect water quality. The European Collaborative Project SOLUTIONS suggests that this likelihood can be estimated with effect-based methods (EBMs) complemented by chemical screening and/or impact modeling. These methods should be used to identify the causes of impacted water quality and to develop programs of measures to improve water quality. Along this line of reasoning, effect-based methods are recommended for Water Framework Directive (WFD) monitoring to cover the major modes of action in the universe of environmentally relevant chemicals so as to evaluate improvements of water quality upon implementing the measures. To this end, a minimum battery of bioassays has been recommended including short-term toxicity to algae, Daphnia and fish embryos complemented with in vitro and short-term in vivo tests on mode-of-action specific effects as proxies for long-term toxicity. The likelihood of adverse impacts can be established with effect-based trigger values, which differentiate good from poor water quality in close alignment with Environmental Quality Standards for individual chemicals, while taking into account mixture toxicity. The use of EBMs is suggested in the WFD as one avenue to establish the likelihood of adverse effects due to chemical pollution in European water systems. The present paper has been written as one component of a series of policy briefs to support decisions on water quality monitoring and management under the WFD.

    2019Environmental Sciences Europe(2019)引用:241
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Mixture risks threaten water quality: the European Collaborative Project SOLUTIONS recommends changes to the WFD and better coordination across all pieces of European chemicals legislation to improve protection from exposure of the aquatic environment to multiple pollutants
    Andreas Kortenkamp,Michael Faust,Thomas Backhaus,Rolf Altenburger,Martin Scholze,Christin Müller,Sibylle Ermler,Leo Posthuma,Werner Brack

    Evidence is mounting that chemicals can produce joint toxicity even when combined at levels that singly do not pose risks. Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) defined for single pollutants under the Water Framework Directive (WFD) do not protect from mixture risks, nor do they enable prioritization of management options. Despite some provisions for mixtures of specific groups of chemicals, the WFD is not fit for purpose for protecting against or managing the effects of coincidental mixtures of water-borne pollutants. The conceptual tools for conducting mixture risk assessment are available and ready for use in regulatory and risk assessment practice. Extension towards impact assessment using cumulative toxic unit and mixture toxic pressure analysis based on chemical monitoring data or modelling has been suggested by the SOLUTIONS project. Problems exist in the availability of the data necessary for mixture risk assessments. Mixture risk assessments cannot be conducted without essential input data about exposures to chemicals and their toxicity. If data are missing, mixture risk assessments will be biassed towards underestimating risks. The WFD itself is not intended to provide toxicity data. Data gaps can only be closed if proper feedback links between the WFD and other EU regulations for industrial chemicals (REACH), pesticides (PPPR), biocides (BPR) and pharmaceuticals are implemented. Changes of the WFD alone cannot meet these requirements. Effect-based monitoring programmes developed by SOLUTIONS should be implemented as they can capture the toxicity of complex mixtures and provide leads for new candidate chemicals that require attention in mixture risk assessment. Efforts of modelling pollutant levels and their anticipated mixture effects in surface water can also generate such leads. New pollutant prioritization schemes conceived by SOLUTIONS, applied in the context of site prioritization, will help to focus mixture risk assessments on those chemicals and sites that make substantial contributions to mixture risks.

    2019Environmental Sciences Europe(2019)引用:55
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Prioritisation of Water Pollutants: the EU Project SOLUTIONS Proposes a Methodological Framework for the Integration of Mixture Risk Assessments into Prioritisation Procedures under the European Water Framework Directive
    Michael Faust,Thomas Backhaus,Rolf Altenburger,Valeria Dulio,Jos van Gils,Antoni Ginebreda,Andreas Kortenkamp,John Munthe,Leo Posthuma,Jaroslav Slobodnik,Knut Erik Tollefsen,Annemarie van Wezel,

    Current prioritisation procedures under the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) do not account for risks from chemical mixtures. SOLUTIONS proposes a multiple-lines-of-evidence approach to tackle the problem effectively. The approach merges all available evidence from co-exposure modelling, chemical monitoring, effect-based monitoring, and ecological monitoring. Full implementation of the proposed methodology requires changes in the legal text in adaptation to scientific progress.

    2019Environmental Sciences Europe(2019)引用:27
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Increase Coherence, Cooperation and Cross-Compliance of Regulations on Chemicals and Water Quality
    John Munthe,Jenny Lexén,Tina Skårman,Leo Posthuma,Werner Brack,Rolf Altenburger,Eva Brorström-Lundén,Dirk Bunke,Michael Faust,Magnus Rahmberg, Frank Sleeuwaert,Jaroslav Slobodnik,

    An analysis of existing regulatory frameworks for chemicals reveals a fragmented situation with a number of regulatory frameworks designed for specific groups of chemicals; for protection of different end-points and covering different parts of the chemicals´ life cycle stages. Lack of- and fragmented information on chemicals (properties, use, emissions as well as fate, occurrence and effects in the environment) limit the ability for assessment and early action, and existing legislation would benefit from more transparency and openness of information and knowledge. To achieve harmonisation of existing legislation and an efficient control of chemical contamination of European waters, a solution-focused approach is proposed including increased ambitions (in monitoring, modelling, and risk assessment), cooperation and dialogue. More holistic and efficient development and implementation of existing legislation can be achieved by better cooperation, harmonisation and information exchange between different regulatory frameworks and by improved science–policy interactions. The introduction of an organisational structure and incentives for cooperation are proposed. Cooperation should focus on harmonisation of advanced monitoring activities, modelling, prioritisation, risk assessment and assessment of risk prevention (‘safe by design’) and minimisation options. A process for dialogue and information exchange between existing policy frameworks and with stakeholders (industry, NGO´s, etc.) should be included to identify feasible options for mitigation as well as regulatory gaps—on local and EU-scales. There is also a need to increase international cooperation and strengthen global agreements to cover the full life cycle of chemicals (produced and consumed globally) and for exchanging knowledge and experiences to allow early action. This recommended action would also provide knowledge and a framework for a shift towards a sustainable chemistry approach for chemical safety based on a “safe by design” concept.

    2019Environmental Sciences Europe(2019)引用:9
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Current EU research activities on combined exposure to multiple chemicals
    Stephanie K. Bopp,Robert Barouki,Werner Brack,Silvia Dalla Costa,Jean-Lou C.M. Dorne, Paula E. Drakvik,Michael Faust,Tuomo K. Karjalainen,Stylianos Kephalopoulos,Jacob van Klaveren,Marike Kolossa-Gehring,Andreas Kortenkamp,

    Humans and wildlife are exposed to an intractably large number of different combinations of chemicals via food, water, air, consumer products, and other media and sources. This raises concerns about their impact on public and environmental health. The risk assessment of chemicals for regulatory purposes mainly relies on the assessment of individual chemicals. If exposure to multiple chemicals is considered in a legislative framework, it is usually limited to chemicals falling within this framework and co-exposure to chemicals that are covered by a different regulatory framework is often neglected. Methodologies and guidance for assessing risks from combined exposure to multiple chemicals have been developed for different regulatory sectors, however, a harmonised, consistent approach for performing mixture risk assessments and management across different regulatory sectors is lacking. At the time of this publication, several EU research projects are running, funded by the current European Research and Innovation Programme Horizon 2020 or the Seventh Framework Programme. They aim at addressing knowledge gaps and developing methodologies to better assess chemical mixtures, by generating and making available internal and external exposure data, developing models for exposure assessment, developing tools for in silico and in vitro effect assessment to be applied in a tiered framework and for grouping of chemicals, as well as developing joint epidemiological-toxicological approaches for mixture risk assessment and for prioritising mixtures of concern. The projects EDC-MixRisk, EuroMix, EUToxRisk, HBM4EU and SOLUTIONS have started an exchange between the consortia, European Commission Services and EU Agencies, in order to identify where new methodologies have become available and where remaining gaps need to be further addressed. This paper maps how the different projects contribute to the data needs and assessment methodologies and identifies remaining challenges to be further addressed for the assessment of chemical mixtures.

    2018Environment International(2018)引用:205
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 13 篇论文

    合作机构(34)

    德国亥姆霍兹研究中心协会合作论文 5
    哥德堡大学合作论文 3
    瑞典环境科学研究院合作论文 3
    Deltares合作论文 3
    布鲁内尔大学合作论文 3
    Environmental Institute合作论文 3
    阿姆斯特丹大学合作论文 2
    荷兰国家公共卫生与环境研究所合作论文 2
    German Federal Environment Agency合作论文 1
    瑞士联邦水科学技术研究所合作论文 1

    机构统计