We describe the case of a woman who developed a perianastomotic collection after colo-colonic anastomosis for restoration of bowel continuity, consistent with an anastomotic dehiscence. Endoscopy revealed a stenotic anastomosis inaccessible to vacuum therapy. A fully endoscopic strategy was pursued, combining internal drainage of the collection with double pigtail stents and treatment of the stenosis through balloon dilation. The patient showed a favorable course, with complete resolution on follow-up. This case underscores the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic management of colo-colonic anastomotic dehiscence, highlighting the importance of simultaneously addressing associated stenosis.
Background: High-grade intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is associated with an elevated risk of recurrent ischemic stroke, particularly in patients with severe stenosis (70–99%). Identifying predictors of early recurrence can inform risk stratification and guide treatment strategies. Methods: The Biomarkers and Recurrence Risk in Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (BIORISK-ICAS) study is a multicenter, international, retrospective cohort analysis pooling data from 35 comprehensive stroke centers. We included hospitalized adult patients with symptomatic ICAS, defined as 50–99% stenosis of an intracranial artery (intracranial vertebral, basilar, distal ICA, or M1 MCA), confirmed by vascular imaging and associated with a qualifying ischemic event. Patients with only high-grade stenosis (70-99%) were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was to determine predictors of recurrent ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic artery within 90 days of the index event. Baseline demographic, clinical, and imaging characteristics were recorded. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with stepwise selection (p < 0.1) was used to identify independent predictors of recurrence; model discrimination was assessed using Harrell’s C-statistics. Results: Among 2,050 patients, 1,476 had high-grade (70-99%) symptomatic ICAS. The mean age was 67 ± 12.5 years, and 767 (55%) were male. Most patients were non-Hispanic (90.1%), taking dual antiplatelet therapy (77.8%), and statins (94.5%). Recurrent stroke occurred in 160 patients (10.8%) within 90 days. In multivariable Cox model, independent predictors of recurrence included atrial fibrillation (HR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.26–3.33; p = 0.004), hyperlipidemia (HR 1.57; 95% CI, 1.10–2.24; p = 0.014), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.36; 95% CI, 0.98–1.88; p = 0.064), and home use of dual antiplatelet therapy (HR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.01–2.54; p = 0.043)(Harrell’s C-statistic=0.62). In patients who underwent perfusion(n=402), mistmatch >10seconds were associated with increased recurrence (HR 1.80; 95% CI 0.95-3.38, p=0.07) and atrial fibrillation (HR 2.06: 95% CI 0.03-4.60, p=0.78) though did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: In this population, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and prior use of dual antiplatelet therapy were associated with increased risk of 90-day recurrent ischemic stroke. Perfusion imaging may help identify high-risk patients who could benefit from intensified secondary prevention.
Background and Objectives: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke in younger adults, yet sex-specific variations in its clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, and outcomes remain underexplored. We aimed to evaluate these differences using data from a large, multicenter registry. Methods: We analyzed data from the STOP-CAD registry, which includes patients with radiologically confirmed non-traumatic CeAD enrolled between 2015 and 2021 across multiple centers. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between men and women using multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes assessed included ischemic stroke recurrence at 180 days, excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1) at 90 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and mortality. Results: Among 4,023 patients with CeAD, 1,783 (44.6%) were women. Compared to men, women were younger (median age: 42 vs 50 years), more likely to have a history of migraine (26.9% vs 8.3%) and connective tissue disorders (14.3% vs 5.8%), and presented more frequently with non-ischemic symptoms such as headache, neck pain, or tinnitus (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.0; 95% CI, 1.8–2.3; p<0.001). Women had significantly higher odds of vertebral artery dissection (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5; p<0.001), multivessel involvement (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.7-2.5; p<0.001), and pseudoaneurysm formation (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; p=0.003). Despite these differences, there was no significant sex-based difference in key clinical outcomes: excellent functional recovery at 90 days (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.15 p=0.542), ischemic stroke recurrence at 180 days (OR 0.56 CI 0.23-1.3 p=0.213), or mortality (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.47-1.48, p=0.529). Conclusion: In this large international cohort, we observed women with CeAD were younger, more likely to present with non-ischemic symptoms with distinct imaging features. These underscore the need for heightened clinical suspicion of CeAD in women presenting with atypical symptoms, even in the absence of ischemic deficits or conventional vascular risk factors, and suggest that sex-specific phenotyping may enhance diagnostic accuracy and early management.
PURPOSE:Dysarthria, drooling, and swallowing disorders are common motor problems in people with Parkinson's disease (PwP), leading to significant physical, emotional, and functional impairments that compromise quality of life. However, evidence on the progression of these disorders and their relationship with other features of Parkinson's disease (PD) remains scarce. This study aimed to investigate the progression of dysarthria, drooling, and swallowing disorders in PwP and identify predictors of progression. METHOD:A 1-year prospective cohort study was conducted with 73 PwP. Dysarthria was assessed using the Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment-Second Edition (FDA-2), drooling with Item 2.2 (Saliva and drooling) of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), and swallowing with the Swallowing Clinical Assessment Score in Parkinson's Disease (SCAS-PD). The FDA-2 and SCAS-PD rely on clinician assessment, whereas MDS-UPDRS Item 2.2 (Saliva and drooling) assesses patient-reported problems with saliva control. The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test for paired samples was used to compare baseline and 1-year follow-up scores, and linear regression was used to identify predictors of progression. RESULTS:Dysarthria worsened significantly (p < .001) after 1 year and was predicted by poorer cognitive (β = -.02; SE = 0.01; p = .02) and motor performance (β = .48; SE = 0.21; p = .03). Drooling and swallowing showed a trend toward deterioration, although these changes were not statistically significant (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS:After 1 year, dysarthria worsened significantly, while drooling and swallowing showed a tendency to decline, but did not reach statistical significance. Assessments based on clinician and patient reports may have limited sensitivity to subtle changes. Dysarthria progression reflected overall PD severity, with poorer cognitive and motor performance emerging as key predictors. These findings highlight the importance of routine clinical monitoring of these domains and support future studies using instrumental assessments (e.g., acoustic analysis and videofluoroscopic swallow studies) to better capture progression in dysarthria, drooling, and swallowing disorders. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32764596.
Background: Patients with cervical artery dissection (CAD) have a higher prevalence of cerebral aneurysms, likely due to underlying vasculopathies. Understanding risk factors and outcomes in this population may inform screening and management strategies. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, a multicenter international registry of patients with non-major trauma-related CAD across 63 centers. Cerebral aneurysms were identified based on medical history and intracranial vascular imaging obtained for dissection diagnosis. We compared demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging characteristics between patients with and without aneurysms. Variables with p<0.05 in univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable binary logistic regression to identify independent predictors. Clinical outcomes including ischemic stroke and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up were compared between both groups. Results: Out of 4023 patients included in the STOP-CAD study, 116 (2.9%) had at least one incidental cerebral aneurysm. In adjusted binary logistic regression, patients with cerebral aneurysm were more likely to have a history of migraine (aOR 1.78 95% CI 1.15-2.75, p=0.009), history of hypertension (aOR 1.65 95% CI 1.12-2.43, p = 0.010), known connective tissue disorder (aOR 3.47 95% CI 1.71-7.03), history of dissection (aOR 2.63 95% CI 1.31-5.28, p = 0.007), and a dissecting aneurysm at the site of the dissection (aOR 1.94 95% CI 1.25-3.01, p = 0.003). At follow-up, the presence of a cerebral aneurysm was not associated with ischemic stroke (7.8% vs. 5.6% p>0.1), but with a trend towards increased odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (3.4% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.062). Conclusions: Patients with CAD and concurrent incidental cerebral aneurysm were more likely to have a history of migraine headaches and markers of underlying vasculopathy and had a non-significantly increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage at follow-up. Further studies are needed to identify best practices for surveillance and risk stratification in this subgroup.
