• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    I

    Institute for Safe Medication Practices

    EST. 1975
    552论文总数
    1万引用总数

    The Institute for Safe Medication Practices is an American 501(c)(3) organization focusing on the prevention of medication errors and promoting safe medication practices. It is affiliated with the ECRI Institute.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Michael R. Cohen
    Michael R. Cohen
    Institute for Safe Medication Practices
    论文:227引用:0H-index:0
    Smetzer Judy L
    Smetzer Judy L
    ISMP, Institute for Safe Medication Practices
    论文:105引用:0H-index:0
    Shastay Ann
    Shastay Ann
    Plymouth Meeting, Institute for Safe Medication Practices
    论文:61引用:0H-index:0
    Susan Paparella
    Susan Paparella
    Institute for Safe Medication Practices
    论文:28引用:0H-index:0
    Thomas J. Moore
    Thomas J. Moore
    Merck and Co;Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University Medical School;Harvard University, DASH Steering Committee
    论文:23引用:0H-index:0
    Grissinger Matthew C
    Grissinger Matthew C
    Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System, Institute for Safe Medication Practices
    论文:22引用:0H-index:0
    Allen J. Vaida
    Allen J. Vaida
    Institute for Safe Medication Practices
    论文:13引用:0H-index:0
    Sylvia Hyland
    Sylvia Hyland
    Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada
    论文:12引用:0H-index:0
    Certina Ho
    Certina Ho
    Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
    论文:12引用:0H-index:0

    论文(552)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Incidence and Type of Voluntary Reported Perianesthetic Medication Errors in Community Veterinary Clinics in Calgary, Canada
    Renata H Pinho, Dorothy Tscheng, Jagjit S Cheema,Daniel S J Pang

    OBJECTIVE To collect medication error (ME) data during the perianesthetic period from small animal clinics. SAMPLE 6 small animal general practice veterinary clinics. METHODS Small animal general practice veterinary clinics were recruited in this prospective observational study, with staff given a presentation on medical errors and instructed on how to submit medication error reports to an online reporting system. Errors were classified according to type and timing. RESULTS A total of 2,728 general anesthesia or sedation procedures were performed, with 49 ME reports submitted. One duplicated report of the same error was excluded, resulting in a ME rate of 1.8%. Most reports (69% [33/48]) were near misses. The remaining 31% were MEs that reached the patient but did not cause harm. Wrong dose errors were the most common type (63% [30/48]), of which 80% (24/30) were calculation errors. Premedication/sedation and maintenance were the most reported stages, at 47% (20/43) and 23% (10/43), respectively. None of the MEs reported resulted in an adverse event, with an approximately 2:1 ratio of near-miss to no-harm MEs. The observed patterns of MEs reported, including type and timing, represent a target for further education. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These results quantify the ME rate in general practice veterinary clinics, providing an initial benchmark for MEs during the perianesthetic period.

    2024American journal of veterinary research(2024)引用:3
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Improving Medication Prescribing-Related Outcomes for Vulnerable Elderly in Transitions on High Risk Medications (IMPROVE-IT HRM): A Pilot Randomized Trial Protocol
    Anne Holbrook,Dan Perri,Mitch Levine,Lawrence Mbuagbaw,Sarah Jarmain,Lehana Thabane,Jean-Eric Tarride,Lisa Dolovich,Sylvia Hyland,Victoria Telford,Jessyca Silva,Carmine Nieuwstraten

    BACKGROUND:Seniors with recurrent hospitalizations who are taking multiple medications including high-risk medications are at particular risk for serious adverse medication events. We will assess whether an expert Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (CPT) medication management intervention during hospitalization with follow-up post-discharge and communication with circle of care is feasible and can decrease drug therapy problems amongst this group.METHODS:The design is a pragmatic pilot randomized trial with 1:1 patient-level concealed randomization with blinded outcome assessment and data analysis. Participants will be adults 65 years and older admitted to internal medicine services for more than 2 days, who have had at least one other hospitalization in the prior year, taking five or more chronic medications including at least one high-risk medication. The CPT intervention identifies medication targets; completes consult, including priorities for improving prescribing negotiated with the patient; starts the care plan; ensures a detailed discharge medication reconciliation and circle-of-care communication; and sees the patient at least twice after hospital discharge via virtual visits to consolidate the care plan in the community. Control group receives usual care. Primary outcomes are feasibility - recruitment, retention, costs, and clinical - number of drug therapy problems improved, with secondary outcomes examining coordination of transitions in care, quality of life, and healthcare utilization and costs. Follow-up is to 3-month posthospital discharge.DISCUSSION:If results support feasibility of ramp-up and promising clinical outcomes, a follow-up definitive trial will be organized using a developing national platform and medication appropriateness network. Since the intervention allows a very scarce medical specialty expertise to be offered via virtual care, there is potential to improve the safety, outcomes, and cost of care widely.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04077281.

    2024Pilot and Feasibility Studies(2024)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Tubing Dangers with Medication Administration
    Ann Shastay

    Ann Shastay, MSN, RN, AOCN, is Senior Manager, Publications, Institute for Safe Medication Practices, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. The author declares no conflicts of interest. Address for correspondence: Ann Shastay, MSN, RN, AOCN, Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), 5200 Butler Pike, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462.

    2024Home healthcare now(2024)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Important Safety Concerns with At-Home Injectables.
    Ann Shastay

    Ann Shastay, MSN, RN, AOCN, is the Senior Manager, Publications, Institute for Safe Medication Practices, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. The author declares no conflicts of interest. Address for correspondence: Ann Shastay, MSN, RN, AOCN, Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), 5200 Butler Pike, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462.

    2024Home healthcare now(2024)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Preventing Neuraxial Administration of Tranexamic Acid.
    Beverley A. Orser,Sylvia Hyland,Robert Byrick

    ( Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. (2023) 70:811–816) This editorial refers to a recent case published by Dr Pysyk and Dr Filteau describing an inadvertent administration of tranexamic acid into the epidural space. The authors of the editorial discuss this case involving a medication error and propose mechanisms to prevent similar errors in the future. While the error was recognized and managed without immediate adverse effects, the potential for catastrophic consequences was highlighted.

    2023Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie(2023)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 552 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    多伦多大学合作论文 19
    Canadian Patient Safety Institute合作论文 12
    Institute for Healthcare Improvement合作论文 11
    American Society of Health-System Pharmacists合作论文 10
    Helping Others in a Positive Environment合作论文 9
    布莱根妇女医院合作论文 9
    布宜诺斯艾利斯大学合作论文 9
    Clinique de l''Acte et PSychosexualité合作论文 9
    西北大学合作论文 8
    Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care,Department of Health,Australian Government合作论文 8

    机构统计