Coordinates: 44°1′20″N 92°28′0″W / 44.02222°N 92.46667°W / 44.02222; -92.46667The Mayo Clinic (/ˈmeɪjoʊ/) is a nonprofit American academic medical center focused on integrated health care, education, and research. It employs over 4,500 physicians and scientists, along with another 58,400 administrative and allied health staff, across three major campuses: Rochester, Minnesota; Jacksonville, Florida; and Phoenix/Scottsdale, Arizona. The practice specializes in treating difficult cases through tertiary care and destination medicine. It is home to the top-15 ranked Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine in addition to many of the highest regarded residency education programs in the United States. It spends over $660 million a year on research and has more than 3,000 full-time research personnel.William Worrall Mayo settled his family in Rochester in 1864 and opened a sole proprietorship medical practice that evolved under his sons, Will and Charlie Mayo, along with practice partners Stinchfield, Graham, Plummer, Millet, Judd, and Balfour, into Mayo Clinic. Today, in addition to the hospital at Rochester, Mayo Clinic has major campuses in Arizona and Florida. Most recently, in 2020, the Mayo Clinic bought a facility in central London, UK. The Mayo Clinic Health System also operates affiliated facilities throughout Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa.Mayo Clinic has ranked number one in the United States for six consecutive years in U.S. News & World Report's Best Hospitals Honor Roll, maintaining a position at or near the top for more than 35 years. It has been on the list of "100 Best Companies to Work For" published by Fortune magazine for fourteen consecutive years, and has continued to achieve this ranking through 2017. Drawing in patients from around the globe, Mayo Clinic performs near the highest number of transplants in the country, including both solid organ and hematologic transplantation.S.S.S.S.S.S.
The 16th Acromegaly Consensus Conference in September 2024 updated recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities. Since the 2020 acromegaly comorbidity management guideline was published, new evidence has emerged on novel and known comorbidities and new treatment approaches. Forty-three experts in the management of acromegaly reviewed the current literature and assessed changes in clinical practice standards and management. Current outcome goals were considered and updated, with a focus on the impact of current and emerging treatments of these comorbidities. Participants assessed factors that determine pharmacological choices, as well as use of specific agents in the management of the most relevant acromegaly comorbidities. We present consensus recommendations highlighting optimization of evidence-based acromegaly comorbidities management.
Covert hepatic encephalopathy (CHE) is a highly prevalent complication of liver cirrhosis. Despite the absence of overt symptoms, CHE is strongly associated with impaired quality-of-life, overt hepatic encephalopathy, and mortality. Over the past two decades, evidence regarding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of CHE has accumulated considerably, and clinical guidelines recommend screening in patients with cirrhosis. Nevertheless, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms have not been fully implemented in real-world practice, and many patients remain undiagnosed and untreated. Understanding the natural history of CHE is essential to improve cirrhosis care, as it provides a framework for appropriate screening, treatment decision-making, and patient counseling. CHE is a multi-organ syndrome with complex interactions between the liver, gut, skeletal muscle, kidneys, and brain, with impaired ammonia handling and systemic inflammation acting as central drivers of this organ crosstalk. Hyperammonemia induces astrocytic dysfunction, brain edema, and neuroinflammation, while systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, sarcopenia, gut dysbiosis, and altered microbial metabolites, including bile acids and short-chain fatty acids, further modulate disease expression. In this review, we summarize current understanding of CHE pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, including psychometric batteries and point-of-care tools, such as the Stroop test and animal naming test, and therapeutic options, ranging from lactulose and rifaximin to microbiome-targeted approaches, including fecal microbiota transplantation. We also highlight major challenges in CHE management, including limited implementation of testing, inadequate biomarkers, diagnostic difficulties in geriatric cirrhosis, and unmet needs in fall and driving risk management, and emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary team-based approaches to improve patient outcomes.
Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is an exceedingly rare mesenchymal neoplasm classified as a soft tissue sarcoma (STS). While historically considered indolent, up to 50
Severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥ 35 kg/m2 with obesity-related comorbidities) is increasingly prevalent and independently associated with elevated perioperative morbidity and inferior oncologic outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite these risks, intentional preoperative weight optimization is not routinely incorporated into CRC management, owing to concerns regarding treatment delay, absence of guideline endorsement, and limited supporting evidence. A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Embase to evaluate the impact of severe obesity on morbidity, mortality, and oncologic outcomes in CRC. Peer-reviewed English-language studies involving adult human subjects were included, while conference abstracts, non-English publications, and studies unrelated to obesity and CRC were excluded. In the absence of published reports describing synchronized weight loss and CRC management in patients with severe obesity, three novel retrospective case examples were included to demonstrate feasibility during neoadjuvant treatment, with institutional review board approval obtained for all cases. Severe obesity complicates CRC staging due to limitations in cross-sectional imaging and anatomic delineation. Furthermore, severe and particularly visceral obesity is associated with increased rates of anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, and conversion to open surgery. Current CRC guidelines do not incorporate structured weight-loss strategies into standard treatment algorithms. Metabolic bariatric procedures, such as sleeve gastrectomy, achieve rapid and clinically meaningful weight reduction, often resulting in improved operative exposure and technical conditions for subsequent resection. Pharmacologic therapies, while more broadly accessible and less invasive, typically yield more modest reductions in visceral adiposity. Task force members report early experience across three distinct cases of locally advanced CRC in patients with severe obesity, demonstrating successful preoperative visceral fat reduction through multidisciplinary coordination incorporating metabolic bariatric surgery or pharmacologic therapy during neoadjuvant windows, followed by definitive oncologic resection. Severe obesity adversely influences CRC staging, operative complexity, and perioperative outcomes. Intentional metabolic optimization—through bariatric surgery or pharmacologic therapy—may represent a viable adjunct within multidisciplinary, patient-centered CRC care pathways. However, the absence of prospective short- and long-term outcome data underscores the need for systematic investigation to define optimal timing, safety parameters, and oncologic efficacy of weight-loss interventions in this high-risk population.
Meniscal preservation is a cornerstone of modern knee surgery given the meniscus’s essential role in load transmission, joint stability, and cartilage protection. As indications for meniscal repair have expanded, understanding the factors associated with repair failure has become increasingly important. The purpose of this review is to synthesize contemporary evidence regarding risk factors for failure of meniscal repair, clarify how failure is defined and evaluated, and outline current strategies for management of failed repairs to guide clinical decision-making. Recent literature supports meniscal repair as a joint-preserving procedure with superior long-term outcomes compared with meniscectomy, though failure and reoperation remain clinically relevant concerns. Failure risk is influenced by a combination of patient-related factors, including smoking status, limb alignment, and medical comorbidities; tear characteristics such as vascular zone, tear pattern, chronicity, and meniscal laterality; and surgical variables including isolated repair versus concomitant ligament reconstruction, repair technique, and postoperative rehabilitation. Advances in repair devices, imaging, and biologic augmentation have improved healing potential, and growing evidence supports revision meniscal repair in select patients with favorable tissue quality and tear morphology. Meniscal repair failure is multifactorial and cannot be attributed to surgical technique alone. Successful outcomes depend on appropriate patient selection, careful assessment of tear biomechanics, selection of an optimal repair strategy, and individualized rehabilitation. Revision meniscal repair remains a viable option for preserving meniscal function in appropriately selected patients. Future research should prioritize standardized definitions of failure, comparative studies of repair techniques, and biologic strategies to further improve healing and long-term joint preservation.
