The Norwegian Meteorological Institute (Norwegian: Meteorologisk institutt), also known internationally as MET Norway, is Norway's national meteorological institute. It provides weather forecasts for civilian and military uses and conducts research in meteorology, oceanography and climatology. It is headquartered in Oslo and has offices and stations in other cities and places. It has around 500 full-time staff and was founded in 1866..
Land-atmosphere coupling is an important process for correctly modelling near-surface temperature profiles, but it involves various uncertainties due to subgrid-scale processes, such as turbulent fluxes or unresolved surface heterogeneities, suggesting a probabilistic modelling approach. We develop a copula Bayesian network (CBN) to interpolate temperature profiles, acting as alternative to T2m-diagnostics used in numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems. The new CBN results in (1) a reduction of the warm bias inherent to NWP predictions of wintertime stable boundary layers allowing cold temperature extremes to be better represented, and (2) consideration of uncertainty associated with subgrid-scale spatial variability. The use of CBNs combines the advantages of uncertainty propagation inherent to Bayesian networks with the ability to model complex dependence structures between random variables through copulas. By combining insights from copula modelling and information entropy, criteria for the applicability of CBNs in the further development of parameterizations in NWP models are derived.
Abstract As scientific instruments and the literature generate ever larger volumes of data, machine learning (ML) has become essential for organizing, analyzing and interpreting complex information. This Perspective examines how ML accelerates discovery across disciplines, with examples such as brain mapping and exoplanet detection. It also considers situations with different levels of prior knowledge about the underlying phenomenon, outlining strategies to address limitations and exploit ML effectively. Although growing reliance on ML raises challenges for research practice and validation, it is reshaping scientific methods and expanding what can be studied. We also highlight foundation models as a promising route to faster, broader scientific discovery.
Sparse point observations are increasingly available for precipitation nowcasting, but it is unclear how much they improve dense radar-field forecasts. We partially address this question with a multimodal graph neural network nowcasting system over the Nordic radar domain. The model predicts rain rate every five minutes up to two hours ahead and is trained with different combinations of radar history, MEPS numerical weather prediction, Netatmo surface observations, MSG satellite channels, stochastic noise, and CRPS-based ensemble losses. The study is designed as an ablation of operationally relevant information sources and training objectives. We compare radar-only, NWP-informed, station-informed, satellite-informed, noise-augmented, and CRPS-based configurations using complementary diagnostics on the radar grid, at station locations, for rain onset, and through oracle, displacement, and amplitude scores. The results show that each source improves a different part of the forecast problem. MEPS stabilises radar-only extrapolation, Netatmo observations improve local station and onset diagnostics, and satellite predictors reduce some station-level biases but may activate rain too early when used deterministically. CRPS-based configurations provide the most consistent radar-grid gains, while the combined satellite and CRPS setup gives the best overall oracle/DAS score. These results do not support the conclusion that point observations are uninformative for nowcasting, but they show that local observational skill and spatially coherent radar-field skill are distinct targets. The practical implication is that sparse observations can provide useful local constraints, but their benefit for radar-like fields depends on the training loss, uncertainty representation, and how observation support is encoded in the model.
Storylines are physically plausible scenarios of future climate change, statistically derived from an ensemble of climate model projections and organized according to the magnitude of projected changes in two or more remote drivers that strongly influence the spatial pattern of the climate response. Here, we provide novel insights into the Arctic storylines identified by Levine et al. (2024), where Barents-Kara Sea warming and lower-tropospheric Arctic warming during the extended summer season (May-October) were remote drivers, as we identify a set of models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 to represent the storylines. We do this by first identifying models that are similar to these storylines in terms of each remote driver response and quantifying this similarity. Second, we evaluate the model's performance in terms of a simple performance score based on the mean normalized root-mean-square error for multiple climate variables of importance for the storylines. The normalized values vary between 0 and 1 for all variables, allowing them to exert a comparable influence on the score. The advantage of the score is that it provides an easily implementable and interpretable way of identifying models that are characterized by large errors relative to the rest of the ensemble. Finally, we combine the similarity estimate and the score to select models to represent the storylines. We focus on the Arctic during the extended summer season for which the storylines were designed, but also consider other seasons and regions. Through this exercise, we also document the methodology, benefits, and limitations of the score.
The global ocean model NEMO is run in a series of stand-alone configurations (2015-2022) to investigate the potential for improving global medium-range storm surge forecasts by including the inverse barometer effect. The analysis focus on the residual water level, i.e. the water level variations not due to tides. Here, we compare a control experiment, where the inverse barometer effect was not included, against a run dynamically forced with mean sea level pressure. In the control experiment, the inverse barometer effect was then calculated diagnostically and added to the ocean model sea surface elevation, resulting in a total of three experiments to investigate. We compare against the global GESLA3 water level data set and find that the inclusion of the inverse barometer effect reduces the root-mean-square error by similar to 1 cm on average. When we mask out all data where the observed residual water level is less than +/- 1 or +/- 2 standard deviations, including the inverse barometer effect reduces the RMS error by 4-5 cm. While both methods reduce water level errors, there are regional differences in their performance. The run with dynamical pressure forcing is seen to perform slightly better than diagnostically adding the inverse barometer effect in enclosed basins such as the Baltic Sea. Finally, an ensemble forecast experiment with the Integrated Forecast System of the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts demonstrates that when the diagnostic inverse barometer effect is included for a severe storm surge event in the North Sea (Storm Xaver, December 2013), the ensemble spread of water level provides a stronger and earlier indication of the observed maximum surge level than the when the effect is excluded.
