• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    R

    Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine,University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    EST. 1849
    226论文总数
    4,104引用总数

    The Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine (formerly the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital) is a specialist alternative medicine hospital located in London, England and a part of University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. It is the largest public sector provider of complementary medicine in Europe. It is based in the Bloomsbury area of Central London, adjacent to Great Ormond Street Hospital.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Mike Cummings
    Mike Cummings
    British Medical Acupuncture Society
    论文:51引用:0H-index:0
    Peter Antony Goodwin Fisher
    Peter Antony Goodwin Fisher
    Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine
    论文:44引用:0H-index:0
    Robbert Van Haselen
    Robbert Van Haselen
    International Institute for Integrated Medicine;World Integrated Medicine Forum;R&D Consultancy
    论文:23引用:0H-index:0
    Prudence Fisher
    Prudence Fisher
    New York State Psychiatric Institute;Dr. Vitiello, NIMH;Johns Hopkins University;Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of California Los Angeles;Medical Center, Duke University;Nathan Kline Institute;Child Study Center, New York University;University of Maryland;University Hospital;Child Study Center, Yale University;University Hospital, Yale University
    论文:13引用:0H-index:0
    Caroline Stevensen
    Caroline Stevensen
    Holistic Health Consultant, Caroline Stevensen
    论文:8引用:0H-index:0
    Saul Berkovitz
    Saul Berkovitz
    UCLH NHS Fdn Trust, Royal London Hosp Integrated Med
    论文:8引用:0H-index:0
    Flávio Dantas
    Flávio Dantas
    Department of Clinical Medicine, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
    论文:8引用:0H-index:0
    Robert T. Mathie
    Robert T. Mathie
    Homeopathy Research Institute
    论文:8引用:0H-index:0
    Andrew Vickers
    Andrew Vickers
    Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University;Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center;Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    论文:7引用:0H-index:0

    论文(226)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    169 Understanding Injuries in Veteran Male Cricket Players: a Cross Sectional Study
    Raj Amarnani, Nicholas Straiton, Matteo Bernardotto
    2026BASEM 2024 Conference Abstracts(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Improving Access to Spinal Injections Using a Primary Care Pathway: an Ultrasound-Guided Injection Clinic Model
    Matteo Bernardotto, Paul Kidman, Nicholas Straiton
    2026BMJ INNOVATIONS(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    310222 ‘yeah, I’ll Do It Again in a Heartbeat’: Exploring Young People’s Experiences of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain Syndromes
    Olga Duarte, John Hughes, Lisa-Renee Sharpe
    2026British Association of General Paediatrics (BAGP)(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4A Systematic Review of Turmeric/Curcumin for Prevention and Treatment of Oral Mucositis Due to Radiotherapy And/or Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer.
    Saul Berkovitz, Nicole Collaço, Klara Dolakova, John Hughes

    INTRODUCTION:Oral mucositis (OM) is oral mucosal damage caused by cancer treatment, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy. It is a common and debilitating adverse effect with significant impact on the quality of life. Current guidelines recommend various treatments, but the evidence base remains limited, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic approaches. Phytotherapy, including turmeric (Curcuma longa), offers potential due to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and wound-healing properties, which have shown promise in addressing inflammatory conditions. This systematic review aims to identify and appraise the quality of studies of turmeric/curcumin (T/C) for OM and evaluate its potential effectiveness and safety to inform future research. METHODS:A systematic search of Medline and CINAHL databases was conducted on October 20, 2025. The Cochrane Risk of Bias v2 and GRADE tools were used to assess the risk of bias and certainty of evidence. All peer-reviewed, primary randomized controlled trials were included, which examined the effectiveness, acceptability, and/or safety of T/C for OM in head and neck cancer participants receiving radiotherapy. We included studies written in any language, published at any time, and conference abstracts if we could not retrieve the full texts but not unpublished articles. Studies were included if they evaluated products containing only turmeric or curcumin (except for flavorings). Studies that evaluated turmeric or curcumin in combination with other herbs or substances were excluded. RESULTS:Nine randomized controlled trials were included, involving 503 participants. Three studies involved radiotherapy alone, and six used radio-chemotherapy. Turmeric/curcumin was administered orally (n = 3), or as mouthwashes/gels (n = 6). All studies reported superiority of turmeric/curcumin in outcomes such as severity and the onset of OM, pain, dysphagia, weight loss, hospitalization for OM, and requirement for nasogastric feeding. Adverse event reporting was generally poor, though no severe AEs were documented. Risk of bias was rated as low in five studies, with two studies rated as "some concerns" and two as "high risk." The GRADE assessment indicated low certainty evidence for two key outcomes: severity of OM and weight loss. CONCLUSION:Turmeric/curcumin for OM management appears to show some potential. High-quality, well-designed studies are needed to assess its clinical efficacy, effectiveness, safety, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness, and the optimal route of delivery and formulation.

    2026Journal of integrative and complementary medicine(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Development of the Traditional Medicine Classification Module 1 in ICD-11
    Kenji Watanabe,Danbo Dou, Yon-Suk Kim, John Hughes

    The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) introduced, for the first time in its history, a chapter dedicated to traditional medicine (TM). This inclusion represents a major step toward the international recognition and standardization of TM concepts and terminologies.This article reviews the background, development process, and significance of incorporating the TM chapter into ICD-11, and discusses future directions for its utilization in health information systems, research, and education.The development of the ICD-11 TM chapter began in 2005 under the WHO Western Pacific Regional Office as part of a standardization project for traditional East Asian medicine. It was transferred to WHO headquarters in 2009, reviewed by 142 experts from 22 countries, and field-tested in Japan, China, Korea, and the United Kingdom.The WHO General Assembly adopted ICD-11 in 2019, and Chapter 26—Traditional Medicine Conditions Module 1—came into effect in January 2022. The inclusion of TM does not imply WHO endorsement of its efficacy or safety, but rather provides a global platform for evidence-based evaluation through research and statistical analysis. Following Module 1, Module 2—covering Ayurveda, Unani, and Siddha—was released in 2025. The establishment of the Traditional Medicine Reference Group (TMRG) within WHO Family of International Classification (WHO-FIC) further facilitates integration of TM concepts into the International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI).The ICD-11 TM chapter provides an essential global framework for TM research, education, and policy, fostering international collaboration toward evidence-based integration of traditional medicine into health systems. Taxonomy Traditional Medicine Classification, WHO ICD-11

    2026Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 226 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    威斯敏斯特大学合作论文 8
    南安普顿大学合作论文 7
    乌伯兰迪亚联邦大学合作论文 6
    卢旺天主教大学合作论文 4
    约克大学合作论文 4
    Witten/Herdecke University合作论文 4
    格拉斯哥大学合作论文 3
    Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy,Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,Government of India合作论文 3
    马里兰大学医学院合作论文 3
    马里兰大学合作论文 3

    机构统计