• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    詹

    詹姆斯癌症医院

    The James Cancer Hospital
    1,563论文总数
    5.2万引用总数

    The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute (commonly shortened to just The James) is part of The Ohio State University and one of the 45 National Comprehensive Cancer hospitals. It is named after Arthur G. James, the founder, who desired a cancer hospital in Columbus, Ohio, United States. With the recent expansion in 2014, it is now the third largest cancer hospital in the United States. In 2020, U.S. News and World Report ranked the hospital as the 30th best cancer hospital in the United States, out of 899 ranked.The hospital conducts treatments for cancer, and conducts research in the Solove Research Institute. The James receives donations through the Pelotonia biking event. Ohio State’s James Cancer Hospital recently received the highest nursing recognition with the prestigious magnet designation.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    John C. Byrd
    John C. Byrd
    College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati
    论文:94引用:0H-index:0
    David Carbone
    David Carbone
    James Thoracic Oncology Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
    论文:42引用:0H-index:0
    Robert Wesolowski
    Robert Wesolowski
    Medical Center James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University
    论文:42引用:0H-index:0
    Krzysztof Mrózek
    Krzysztof Mrózek
    Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University
    论文:39引用:0H-index:0
    Richard M. Stone
    Richard M. Stone
    Dana-Farber Cancer Institute;Harvard Medical School
    论文:37引用:0H-index:0
    Gregory A. Otterson
    Gregory A. Otterson
    Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University
    论文:32引用:0H-index:0
    Nicolet Deedra
    Nicolet Deedra
    Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Statistics and Data Center, The Ohio State University
    论文:31引用:0H-index:0
    Andrew J Carroll Ill
    Andrew J Carroll Ill
    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham
    论文:30引用:0H-index:0
    Jonathan E. Kolitz
    Jonathan E. Kolitz
    The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System
    论文:29引用:0H-index:0

    论文(1564)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Receipt of Combined Axillary Dissection and Nodal Irradiation Varies by Age
    Sara P. Myers,Yevgeniya Gokun, Brandon Slover, shley P. Davenport, herese Y. Andraos, Nerea Lopetegui-Lia, Heather LeFebvre,Daniel G. Stover, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf,Tari A. King,Olga Kantor

    Combination axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) poses the greatest risk for breast cancer-related lymphedema. Despite interest in minimizing combination therapy (i.e., ALND+RNI) to avoid complications, concern remains over the oncologic safety of de-escalation in younger populations. This retrospective analysis explores the association between age and receipt of ALND+RNI to gain insight into patterns of axillary management. Using the National Cancer Database (2018–2020), age-based differences in ALND+RNI among patients with stage I–III breast cancer undergoing surgery were examined. Patient and treatment characteristics were compared by age (<45, 45–64, and ≥65 years). Multivariable regression assessed associations between age and treatment, adjusting for clinical factors. Among 439,790 patients, 7.5

    2026Annals of Surgical Oncology(2026)引用:36
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Assessing Patient Characteristics in Neuroendocrine Tumor Research: A Comparison of the NET-PRO Study to SEER Population-Based Data
    Michael A. O’Rorke,Bradley D. McDowell, Tao Xu, Rhonda R. DeCook,Brian M. Gryzlak, Nicholas J. Rudzianski, Kimberly C. Serrano, Abigayle M. Wehrheim, Udhayvir S. Grewal, Chandrikha Chandrasekharan,Joseph S. Dillon, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson,

    We compared demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) enrolled in the NET-PRO study to those in the U.S. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program to evaluate the comparability of NET-PRO as a resource for real-world evidence generation and patient reported outcomes (PROs). NET-PRO enrolled adults with GEP or lung NETs from 14 health systems between 2018 and 2024. SEER data included patients diagnosed with NETs from 2018 to 2021 across 22 U.S. cancer registries. We compared age, sex, race/ethnicity, tumor site, stage, and surgery between cohorts using standardized mean differences (SMDs), with values ≥ 0.2 interpreted as meaningful. We analyzed 1,974 GEP-NET and 394 lung NET patients in NET-PRO versus 38,942 and 11,265, respectively, in SEER. Most demographic and clinical characteristics were broadly similar between cohorts, with trivial differences by sex (SMDs 0.16–0.22) and moderate differences in mean age (SMD = 0.47 for lung NETs). Race/ethnicity differences were larger, with Non-Hispanic White patients overrepresented in NET-PRO (SMDs 0.53–0.84). Tumor site and stage distributions differed modestly. Surgery rates were comparable for GEP-NETs but higher among NET-PRO lung NET patients (SMD = 0.47). NET-PRO demonstrates broadly comparable demographic characteristics to SEER across factors such as age and sex. While race/ethnicity differences highlight areas for improved inclusion, other areas of variation suggest important future research covariates. These findings support the contextual comparability of NET-PRO with the broader NET population and its value as a resource for real-world evidence generation. NCT05064150 (Start Date: 2022-05-10).

    2026Endocrine(2026)引用:16
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Genomic Determinants of Response and Resistance to Pirtobrutinib in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
    Jennifer R Brown,Bastien Nguyen, Sai Prasad Desikan,Helen Won, Shady I Tantawy, Samuel C McNeely, Narasimha Marella, Hetal S Randeria, Lauren M Hanson, Andrew Parker, Salomé Calado Botelho,Jennifer A Woyach,

    ABSTRACT:Pirtobrutinib, a noncovalent, reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), demonstrated efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), resistant to covalent BTKi (cBTKi). We analyzed genomic correlations with response and resistance to pirtobrutinib in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with CLL pretreated with cBTKi enrolled in the phase 1/2 BRUIN trial. DNA sequencing was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells at baseline, on treatment, and at progressive disease (PD). Common alterations at baseline included mutations in BTK (43%), TP53 (38%), SF3B1 (25%), NOTCH1 (23%), ATM (19%), XPO1 (11%), PLCG2 (9%), BCL2 (8%), and 17p deletion (28%). Common baseline BTK mutations included C481S (85%), C481R (10%), C481F (6%), and C481Y (4%). At PD, 60 of 88 patients (68%) acquired ≥1 mutation, including 44% with acquired BTK mutations and 24% with other acquired mutations. A total of 55 acquired BTK mutations were detected in 39 patients, including gatekeeper mutations (T474I/F/S/Y/L, 26%), kinase-impaired L528W (16%), C481S/R/Y (5%), V416L (2%), and A428D (1%) and others proximal to the adenosine triphosphate-binding pocket, D539A/G/H (1%) and Y545N (1%). Decrease or complete clearance of BTK C481x was observed at PD in 36 of 43 patients (84%). Using a more sensitive assay, 37% (18/49) of acquired BTK mutations were detected at baseline at low allele frequency. Using a highly sensitive assay at progression, a similar frequency of acquired BTK mutations (39%) was detected, and all patients had detectable acquired mutations. This study highlights the complex clonal dynamics of BTK mutations in patients with R/R CLL undergoing pirtobrutinib treatment, and the extent of resistance without an obvious genomic driver. Trial registration: #NCT03740529 at www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

    2026Blood(2026)引用:4
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Immune Thrombocytopenia in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
    Rebecca K Leaf,Jodi V Mones, Tushar Shenoy, Mohamed Warsame, Marina Beltrami-Moreira, Sandhya Panch,Andrew D Leavitt, Rebecca L Zon,Ellen K Kendall, Sahar Shahamatdar, Tristan L Lim, Can Cui,

    Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated immune thrombocytopenia (ICI-ITP) has been described in case reports and small case series, but comprehensive data on its incidence, risk factors, clinical features, treatment, and outcomes are lacking. We reviewed medical records of all adults initiating ICI therapy between 2016-2023 at 29 U.S. hospitals across seven major cancer centers to identify cases of ICI-ITP. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors, and Cox modeling was performed to assess the association between ICI-ITP, its severity, and mortality. Among 86,467 patients, ICI-ITP occurred in 214 (0.25%). Independent risk factors included lower baseline platelet count, combination ICI therapy, stage 4 cancer, and additional immune-related adverse events. ICI-ITP occurred at a median of 8 weeks (IQR, 4-18) after ICI initiation, with a median nadir platelet count of 41 x109/L (IQR, 17-64). Patients were treated with glucocorticoids (n=106, [49.5%]), immune globulin (n=39 [18.2%]), and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (n=29 [13.6%]). Recovery occurred in 161 patients (75.2%) at a median of 2.3 weeks (IQR, 1.0-5.3). Of 76 patients rechallenged with ICIs, 23 (30.3%) developed recurrent ICI-ITP. ICI-ITP and its severity were associated with higher all-cause mortality, with a nearly threefold increase in risk among patients with severe ICI-ITP compared with those without ICI-ITP (adjusted HR 2.96 [95% CI, 2.14-4.08]). These findings establish ICI-ITP as a rare but clinically significant complication of ICI therapy, provide the first large-scale description of its risk factors and clinical course, and underscore the importance of timely recognition and management.

    2026Blood(2026)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Pimicotinib Versus Placebo for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumour (MANEUVER): an International, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial.
    Hairong Xu,Xiaohui Niu,Vinod Ravi,Javier Martin-Broto, Albiruni Abdul Razak, Ramy Saleh,Yong Zhou,Jingnan Shen,Tang Liu, Kamlesh Kumar Sankhala,César Serrano,Silvia Stacchiotti,

    BACKGROUND:Tenosynovial giant cell tumour (TGCT) is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm that affects otherwise healthy adults. There are few systemic treatment options, highlighting an unmet need. We report the results of part 1 of the MANEUVER trial, which aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pimicotinib, a highly selective, potent, colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor inhibitor, in patients with TGCT. METHODS:MANEUVER is a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done in 40 specialised hospitals in Asia, Europe, and North America. Patients aged 18 years and older with unresectable, symptomatic TGCT (patient-reported worse stiffness or worst pain of at least 4 on a scale of 0-10) were randomly assigned (2:1, double-blind) to oral, once-daily pimicotinib 50 mg or placebo for 24 weeks (part 1). An independent statistician used a central interactive web response system to generate the randomisation schedule; stratification was by region (China vs non-China). Masking was achieved by using placebo identical in appearance to pimicotinib. In part 1, patients, all investigators, and study funders were masked to treatment assignments. All patients who completed part 1 were allowed to continue to open-label part 2: pimicotinib-treated patients could continue the same dosage and placebo-treated patients could cross over to receive pimicotinib for 24 weeks. Eligible patients who completed part 2 were allowed to continue once-daily pimicotinib long-term in part 3. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) at week 25 by blinded independent review committee per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients). Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Missing data were not imputed and only observed data were analysed. Trial enrolment is complete; the study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05804045) and is ongoing. FINDINGS:Between April 27, 2023, and March 29, 2024, 126 patients were screened and 94 patients (China [n=45], non-China [n=49]) were randomly assigned to, and received, pimicotinib (n=63) or placebo (n=31). 30 (32%) patients were male and 64 (68%) were female. ORR at week 25 was 54% (34 of 63) in the pimicotinib group and 3% (one of 31) in the placebo group (absolute difference 51% [95% CI 33-63], p<0·0001). Pimicotinib was associated with mainly mild treatment-emergent adverse events, including mostly manageable asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities and clinical events, such as pruritus, facial oedema, rash, periorbital oedema, and fatigue. The only grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse event occurring in more than 10% of pimicotinib-treated patients was increase in blood creatine phosphokinase, in eight (13%) of 63 patients. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the placebo group were fatigue and arthralgia. Dose reductions occurred in five (8%) of 63 pimicotinib-treated patients and treatment discontinuations in one (2%) of 63 pimicotinib-treated patients. There was no cholestatic hepatotoxicity, drug-induced liver injury, or hypopigmentation of skin or hair. INTERPRETATION:Pimicotinib showed robust antitumour activity with clinically meaningful improvements in TGCT-related functional limitations and symptom burden, offering an effective treatment option with a manageable safety profile for this underserved condition. FUNDING:Abbisko Therapeutics.

    2026Lancet (London, England)(2026)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 1564 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    俄亥俄州立大学合作论文 490
    纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心合作论文 150
    德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校合作论文 122
    华盛顿大学合作论文 119
    丹娜—法伯癌症研究所合作论文 113
    莫菲特癌症中心合作论文 94
    俄亥俄州立大学韦克斯纳医疗中心合作论文 89
    希望之城国家医疗中心合作论文 88
    宾夕法尼亚大学合作论文 87
    温纳贝戈医学中心合作论文 87

    机构统计