• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    U

    University of Maine System

    院校EST. 1968
    3,807论文总数
    6.9万引用总数

    The University of Maine System (UMaine System or UMS) is a state university system in the U.S. state of Maine. It was created in 1968 by the Maine Legislature and consists of eight institutions, each with a distinct mission and regional character. Combined, there are approximately 33,000 students enrolled at these institutions.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Ahrens Katherine A
    Ahrens Katherine A
    Public Health Program of the Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine
    论文:48引用:0H-index:0
    G. Horton-Smith
    G. Horton-Smith
    Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University
    论文:41引用:0H-index:0
    J. Nowak
    J. Nowak
    Department of Physics, Lancaster University
    论文:40引用:0H-index:0
    A. Schukraft
    A. Schukraft
    University of Pittsburgh
    论文:40引用:0H-index:0
    Giles Barr
    Giles Barr
    Department of Physics, University of Oxford
    论文:38引用:0H-index:0
    M. H. Kirby
    M. H. Kirby
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL)
    论文:38引用:0H-index:0
    S. Dytman
    S. Dytman
    Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh
    论文:38引用:0H-index:0
    J. L. Raaf
    J. L. Raaf
    University of Cincinnati
    论文:36引用:0H-index:0
    Georgia Karagiorgi
    Georgia Karagiorgi
    Columbia University
    论文:35引用:0H-index:0

    论文(3807)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Bringing Anti-Oppression Pedagogy Training into a Predominately White Institution in the United States: A Qualitative Analysis of the Challenges and Accelerators Faculty Face in Anti-Oppression Work.
    Kristen D Gleason, Julianne Siegfriedt, Jordyn Coreau, Rebecca Nisetich, Idella Glenn, Vaishali Mamgain

    We aim to better understand how to design impactful anti-oppression pedagogy training programs for faculty at predominantly White institutions (PWIs). To do this, we analyzed data from faculty participants in an anti-oppression training program to identify factors that faculty described as either challenges or accelerators to bringing anti-oppression pedagogy into the classroom. We contextualize these factors using an ecological perspective to examine potential challenges and accelerators at multiple levels of influence. This analysis of the challenges faculty face, along with impactful programmatic elements, informed our recommendations for future faculty training in anti-oppression classroom practice. We analyzed data from faculty participants ( N  = 15) in an intensive anti-oppression training program using thematic analysis to sort qualitative data from participant surveys and interviews into (1) the ecological level discussed and (2) factors participants described as either Challenges or Accelerators as they worked to bring an anti-oppression intervention into the classroom. We cross-examined the Challenge and Accelerator codes across ecological levels to capture the complex contexts of bringing anti-oppression pedagogy into the classroom. We identified several ecological settings as important to shaping the challenges or accelerators faculty encountered in their anti-oppression work: Academia, Field of Study , University setting, Department setting, and Classroom setting. The multilevel challenges and accelerators that faculty may face in doing anti-oppression work at a PWI are discussed. We then identified overarching patterns in our thematic analysis and used these to recommend potential key ingredients for designing training programs to accelerate faculty work in anti-oppression pedagogy. Based on our analysis, we propose two key ingredients for anti-oppression faculty training programs: (1) facilitating faculty ownership of ongoing critical analysis of how power operates in their positionality related to interlocking systems of oppression, their academic discipline, and their classroom practice and (2) the development of an interdisciplinary community of learners who support each other in ongoing reflection, learning, and critical praxis. If PWIs want faculty to address issues of equity and justice, then they must acknowledge the nested challenges of anti-oppression work and invest in the necessary institutional changes and training.

    2026Journal of community psychology(2026)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Conserving Climate‐change Refugia: Insights from Research and Practice
    Toni Lyn Morelli, Tina Mozelewski, Cybil Nicole Cavalieri, Andrew J. Caven,Lindsay M. Dreiss, Rachel A. Hovel, Melissa Hua,Megan K. Jennings,Aji John, Gregory Kehm,Gunnar Keppel,Meg A. Krawchuk,

    As the impacts of anthropogenic climate change increase, conservation of climate-change refugia has become a key strategy for effective environmental stewardship. Over the last 5 years, the field of climate-change refugia conservation has made exciting advances, shifting from concepts and theory to refugia mapping and implementation. However, few studies have advanced to action on the ground; while 84% of studies identified and mapped refugia, only 4% involved implementing management action. Moreover, taxonomic and geographic gaps remain, with most studies focused on terrestrial plants and vertebrates in Europe and North America. Here, we outline impediments to implementation following the steps of the Climate-Change Refugia Conservation Cycle. Based on a systematic literature review, we elucidate advances and obstacles with examples from a diversity of systems and sectors from across the world and highlight emerging work bridging the gap between research and implementation.

    2026CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE(2026)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Incorporating Environmental Variability into Physiological Experiments: Rationale and Resources.
    Emily A Hardison, Emily Donham, Melanie Massey,Andrea J Morash, Gail D Schwieterman

    Our understanding of how environmental variability shapes animal physiology and behaviour is rapidly evolving. This is largely facilitated by a new wave of physiology research that has embraced environmental variability by simulating real-world conditions in experimental designs. While the move away from classical static holding conditions offers promising insights into environmental physiology, it can also be logistically challenging, time-intensive and expensive. Here, we review when and where variability arises in aquatic environments and highlight exemplary studies that demonstrate how embracing variability can help us better understand organismal performance. We also discuss challenges associated with various types of manipulations and summarize technological advances, considerations and tips that we hope will make it less daunting for researchers to investigate the effects of environmental variability. This article is part of the theme issue 'Embracing variability in comparative physiology: why it matters and what to do with it'.

    2026Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Optimal Polynomial Approximants in H^p
    Raymond Centner,Raymond Cheng,Christopher Felder

    This work studies optimal polynomial approximants (OPAs) in the classical Hardy spaces on the unit disk, Hp (1 < p < infinity). In particular, we uncover some estimates concerning the OPAs of degree zero and one. It is also shown that if f is an element of Hp is an inner function, or if p > 2 is an even integer, then the roots of the nontrivial OPA for 1/fare bounded from the origin by a distance depending only on p. For p not equal 2, these results are made possible by the novel use of a family of inequalities which are derived from a Banach space analogue of the Pythagorean theorem.

    2026JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Integrating Blue Foods into Food System Approaches and Frameworks
    Hillary Smith, Sahir Advani, Sharon K. Suri, Iddrisu Amadu, Molly Ahern, Clara Obregon Lafuente, Michael Kriegl, Sophie Standen, Chris Giordano,Stefan Partelow

    Despite supplying essential nutrients to billions of people and sustaining hundreds of millions of livelihoods, blue foods are overlooked within food system frameworks and debates. This Perspective highlights the shortcomings and potential of the High-Level Panel Of Experts (HLPE) sustainable food systems (SFS) framework in addressing blue food dynamics. Drawing on a review of 124 peer-reviewed articles that cite the HLPE framework, and an examination of its authorship and values, we demonstrate that blue foods are rarely integrated into food systems analyses, reflecting epistemic inequalities in the field. We identify critical omissions—including production dynamics, food loss and waste, consolidation in supply chains, and normative values shaping decision-making—that constrain the framework’s application to blue foods (and other diverse contexts). To advance more inclusive and effective food system approaches, we recommend (1) greater use of food systems frameworks to examine blue food dynamics and other diverse food systems contexts, (2) updates to the SFS framework to integrate blue food contexts, and (3) guidance to operationalize these frameworks for research and policy action. We call on the HLPE to update the SFS framework, particularly through the forthcoming (2027) report on fisheries and aquaculture, to spotlight the framework’s utility for capturing the complexity of diverse yet essential food systems beyond production, including aquatic food systems.

    2026ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH FOOD SYSTEMS(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 3807 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    缅因大学合作论文 126
    密歇根大学合作论文 86
    匹兹堡大学合作论文 76
    明尼苏达大学合作论文 67
    耶鲁大学合作论文 65
    哥伦比亚大学合作论文 65
    哈佛大学合作论文 61
    科罗拉多州大学合作论文 59
    麻省理工学院合作论文 59
    芝加哥大学合作论文 58

    机构统计