• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    W

    Wills 眼科医院

    Wills Eye Hospital
    EST. 1832willseye.org
    1,398论文总数
    4.7万引用总数

    Wills Eye Hospital is a non-profit eye clinic and hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It was established in 1832 and is the oldest continually operating eye-care facility in the United States. It is affiliated with the medical school of Thomas Jefferson University.Since 1990, Wills Eye Hospital has consistently been ranked one of the top three ophthalmology hospitals in the United States by U.S. News & World Report and its ophthalmology residency program is considered one of the most competitive residency programs in the world.

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Carol L. Shields
    Carol L. Shields
    Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University;Wills Eye Hospital
    论文:89引用:0H-index:0
    Jerry Shields
    Jerry Shields
    Wills Eye Hospital;Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University
    论文:74引用:0H-index:0
    George L. Spaeth
    George L. Spaeth
    Wills Eye Hospital;Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University
    论文:72引用:0H-index:0
    Peter Robert Laibson
    Peter Robert Laibson
    Wills Eye Hospital
    论文:57引用:0H-index:0
    Christopher J Rapuano
    Christopher J Rapuano
    Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals
    论文:48引用:0H-index:0
    Ralph C. Eagle
    Ralph C. Eagle
    Pathology Department
    论文:35引用:0H-index:0
    E J Cohen
    E J Cohen
    Elisabeth J. Cohen, Wills Eye Hospital
    论文:35引用:0H-index:0
    Allen Chiang
    Allen Chiang
    Wills Eye Hospital
    论文:32引用:0H-index:0
    Cl Shields
    Cl Shields
    Ocular Oncology ServiceWills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University
    论文:32引用:0H-index:0

    论文(1398)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1Global Consensus on Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases-Edition 2.
    José A P Gomes,Farhad Hafezi,Renato Ambrósio,Maria A Henriquez,Mauro Campos,Shigeru Kinoshita, John Nkurikiye,Shizuka Koh,Stephanie Watson, Cosimo Mazzotta, Emilio Torres-Netto,Michael W Belin,

    PURPOSE:Ten years after the first Global Consensus on Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases, this updated edition revisits key issues, incorporates advances in new technologies, and integrates the expertise of corneal and refractive surgeons from 12 international societies. This initiative aimed to establish a consensus among global ophthalmology experts, including corneal and refractive specialists from 6 continents, on the definition, diagnosis, staging, clinical management, and surgical treatment of keratoconus and ectatic corneal diseases. METHODS:The Delphi method consisted of 4 rounds of questionnaires, supplemented by a face-to-face meeting. A total of 128 ophthalmologists participated, with 3 main coordinators and 125 keratoconus experts distributed across 7 panels: definition/diagnosis/staging, clinical treatment and noninvasive visual rehabilitation, cross-linking for progression, and invasive visual rehabilitation (including therapeutic approaches, improved corrected distance visual acuity, keratoplasty techniques, and cataract surgery in keratoconus). The consensus threshold was defined as at least two-thirds agreement. RESULTS:A significant consensus was reached on topics such as definitions, diagnostic and progression criteria, and management strategies for keratoconus and other ectatic corneal disorders. A comprehensive approach was outlined, encompassing both nonsurgical and surgical treatments, organized in a group-based approach. In addition, major agreements and disagreements across the 7 subcommittees are outlined in individual tables. CONCLUSIONS:This updated Global Consensus provides revised definitions, expert statements, and recommendations for diagnosing and managing keratoconus and other ectatic corneal diseases. It benefits from broader participation, with more refractive surgeons and greater representation from major ophthalmic societies across 6 continents, capturing a wider range of global clinical perspectives than the prior report.

    2026Cornea(2026)引用:2
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Comparing the Use of Measured and Smoothed Data in Forecasting Visual Field Tests Using Deep Learning
    Ashkan Abbasi,Sowjanya Gowrisankaran,Wei-Chun Lin,Xubo Song, Bhavna Josephine Antony,Gadi Wollstein, Joel S Schuman,Hiroshi Ishikawa

    Objective: To evaluate the impact of training and testing deep learning (DL) models for visual field (VF) forecasting using input-target pairs in which the target is either the measured VF test result, or its smoothed counterpart constructed via linear regression. Design: A retrospective data analysis study evaluating DL models for VF forecasting under multiple training and testing configurations. Subjects and Controls: A total of 1400 subjects (healthy and glaucoma patients) with 19 437 reliable Humphrey VF (24-2 Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm) tests collected from longitudinal cohorts at the University of Pittsburgh and New York University. Methods: Three DL-based pointwise VF forecasting methods were trained and tested under 4 different configurations formed by using measured and smoothed VF targets. Smoothed targets were constructed by applying linear regression over triplets of consecutive VF tests. Models were assessed using fivefold cross-validation and mean absolute error (MAE) as the training and testing metric. Main Outcome Measures: Mean absolute error of forecasted VF test results under various training and testing configurations. Results: Models trained and tested on smoothed VF targets consistently achieved lower MAEs compared to those trained and tested on measured VF targets. The performance improvements were most prominent in the 0.5- to 1.5-year forecast range. Furthermore, models trained with smoothed VF targets showed comparable performance when evaluated against measured VF targets. Conclusions: Using smoothed VF targets for training improves forecasting accuracy by guiding DL models to learn long-term trends in the data rather than forcing them to model noise and short-term variabilities, which are prevalent in VF test data. This approach aligns with clinical goals of assessing meaningful functional changes over time and suggested to be considered in future DL-based VF modeling efforts. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

    2026Ophthalmology science(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Complications and Challenges of Refractive Surgery.
    Henry Bair, Ugochi T Aguwa,Zeba A Syed

    PURPOSE OF REVIEW:This review provides an overview of possible complications of the most commonly performed refractive surgeries: laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), and lens-based refractive surgery. While the vast majority of refractive surgeries are safe with successful outcomes, complications can still occur which requires surgeons to have an in-depth understanding of complication prevention and management. RECENT FINDINGS:Although overall rare, corneal laser refractive procedures and lens-based refractive surgeries are associated with a distinct set of potential complications. The most common complications from LASIK, PRK, and SMILE include flap issues, infectious keratitis, haze, dry eye disease, and corneal ectasia. Implantable collamer lenses (ICLs) come with a possible risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract formation. Refractive lens exchange (RLE) introduces younger patients to potential complications typically associated with cataract surgery, such as dysphotopsias, uveitis, and retinal detachment. SUMMARY:The elective nature of refractive surgery may raise expectations of patients for successful outcomes. This timely review provides relevant and detailed guidance to refractive surgeons on best practices to mitigate potential complications, and ultimately maximize patient safety and satisfaction.

    2026Current opinion in ophthalmology(2026)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Using Provenance Dispersion to Triage Uncertain Neurosymbolic OCT Diagnoses.
    Henry Bair
    2026Translational vision science & technology(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Enucleation of an Eye with Potential High-Risk Retinoblastoma is Currently Important for Patient Survival.
    Carol L Shields,Sara E Lally,Amish C Shah
    2026Retina (Philadelphia, Pa)(2026)
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 1398 篇论文

    合作机构(100)

    托马斯杰斐逊大学合作论文 139
    宾夕法尼亚大学合作论文 34
    天普大学合作论文 19
    加州大学合作论文 18
    贝勒医学院合作论文 16
    马萨诸塞州眼耳医院合作论文 15
    杜克大学合作论文 13
    温纳贝戈医学中心合作论文 12
    哥伦比亚大学合作论文 12
    迈阿密大学合作论文 11

    机构统计