• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    W

    WiseEuropa

    3论文总数
    42引用总数

    论文量&引用量时间轴

    机构学者

    排序
    Sandrine Mathy
    Sandrine Mathy
    Centre International
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Maciej Bukowski
    Maciej Bukowski
    Inst Struct Res, Warsaw Sch Econ
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Sascha Samadi
    Sascha Samadi
    Wuppertal Inst Climate Environm & Energy
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Aleksander Śniegocki
    Aleksander Śniegocki
    WiseEuropa
    论文:2引用:0H-index:0
    Manfred Fischedick
    Manfred Fischedick
    Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy (WI),
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Enrica De Cian
    Enrica De Cian
    Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Ramiro Parrado
    Ramiro Parrado
    RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment, Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Hilton Trollip
    Hilton Trollip
    the Energy for Development Research Centre, University of Cape Town
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0
    Pantelis Capros
    Pantelis Capros
    Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens
    论文:1引用:0H-index:0

    论文(3)

    年份
    起
    –
    止
    排序
    1A Green COVID-19 Recovery of the EU Basic Materials Sector: Identifying Potentials, Barriers and Policy Solutions
    Olga Chiappinelli,Timo Gerres,Karsten Neuhoff,Frederik Lettow,Heleen de Coninck,Balazs Felsmann,Eugenie Joltreau,Gauri Khandekar,Pedro Linares,Joern Richstein,Aleksander Sniegocki,Jan Stede,

    This paper explores climate-friendly projects that could be part of the COVID-19 recovery while jump-starting the transition of the European basic materials industry. Findings from a literature review on technology options in advanced development stages for climate-friendly production, enhanced sorting, and recycling of steel, cement, aluminium, and plastics, are combined with insights from interviews with 31 European stakeholders in these sectors about the practical and economic feasibility of these technology options. Results indicate that with an estimated investment of 28.9 billion Euros, up to 20% of EU's basic materials could be produced through low-emission processes or additional recycling by 2025 with technologies that are commercially available or at pilot scale today. However, our stakeholder consultation also shows that in order to make these short-term investments viable, six main barriers need to be addressed, namely: (i) the lack of effective and predictable carbon pricing, (ii) the limited availability of affordable green electricity, (iii) the lack of a regulatory framework for circularity, (iv) low technology market readiness and funding, (v) the lack of infrastructure for hydrogen, CO2 and power, and (vi) the lack of demand for climate-friendly and recycled materials. Based on these insights, the paper proposes elements of a policy package that can create a framework favourable for investments in these technologies; these policies should ideally accompany the recovery package to give credibility to investors that the business case will last beyond the recovery period. Key policy insights Technologies for climate-friendly materials production, sorting and recycling can be supported as part of the recovery package but require an enabling policy framework. Combining continued free allocation with a Climate Contribution within the EU ETS can enhance economic viability of climate-friendly options. Project-based Carbon Contracts for Difference can eliminate carbon price uncertainty for climate-friendly processes. Auctions for publicly backed Contracts for Difference and Power Purchasing Agreements can guarantee price-stability of low-emission electricity. Green public procurement and public-private partnerships can provide infrastructure for hydrogen, CO2 and electricity while creating demand for climate-friendly materials. Revising regulations on product design and end-of-life emissions can improve sorting and recycling incentives.

    2021Climate Policy(2021)引用:40
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2COP21: Results and Implications for Pathways and Policies for Low Emissions European Societies
    Gabrial Anandarajah,Michael Grubb, Olivier Dressens,Paul Drummond,Alvaro Calzadilla Rivera,Matthew Winning,Nadia Ameli,Marta Torres Gunfaus,Roberta Pierfederici,Henri Waisman,Ramiro Parrado,Enrica De Cian,

    This database contains national and global level modelling scenario results produced under the COP21:RIPPLES project https://www.cop21ripples.eu/ The data is also hosted in the IIASA RIPPLES Scenario Explorer https://data.ene.iiasa.ac.at/cop21ripples/#/login The National Determined Contributions (NDCs) provide important indications regarding the future GHG emissions and related policies, in relation to the international energy market, technological, economic, trade and financial context. This key information on the development trajectories of major economies is essential for EU policy development as it will determine the global context in which EU policies will evolve. Nevertheless, the NDCs adopt a medium-term horizon and do not provide all the required information to fully characterize the detailed energy system pathways that meet the Paris Agreement (PA) goals. NDCs therefore fall short of characterizing the global trajectories at a sufficiently granular and long-term perspective for informing EU policies. To close this knowledge gap, COP21:RIPPLES aims at analysing the underlying transformations required in the different sectors of the economy to meet the PA mitigation targets. To this purpose, COP21:RIPPLES uses existing scenarios as well as a number of new national and global scenarios. These new scenarios are not conceived themselves as an output of the project but rather as methodological tool to answer specific questions across different Work Packages. For description of the models and scenarios included in each Excel file, see the documentation "RIPPLES_ScenarioExplorer_Doc_v4.docx". For more information on these models and scenarios, see the COP21:RIPPLES Deliverables D2.6, D3.2 and D3.5.

    2020Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)(2020)引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3State of the Low-Carbon Energy Union: Assessing the EU’s Progress Towards Its 2030 and 2050 Climate Objectives
    Tom Spencer,Roberta Pierfederici,Oliver Sartor,Nicolas Berghmans,Sascha Samadi,Manfred Fischedick,Katharina Knoop,Steve Pye,Patrick Criqui,Sandrine Mathy,Pantélis Capros,Panagiotis Fragkos,

    In order to assess the adequacy of the EU and its Member States policies with the 2030 and 2050 decarbonisation objectives, this study goes beyond the aggregate GHG emissions or energy use figures and analyse the underlying drivers of emission changes, following a sectoral approach (power generation, buildings, industry, and transport).

    2016引用:1
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间

    合作机构(18)

    Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations合作论文 2
    开普敦大学合作论文 1
    Corvinus University of Budapest合作论文 1
    布鲁塞尔大学合作论文 1
    清华大学合作论文 1
    伦敦大学学院合作论文 1
    PSL 研究大学合作论文 1
    Grenoble Applied Economics Lab合作论文 1
    Cambia合作论文 1
    Comillas Pontifical University合作论文 1

    机构统计