"Editorial - Sound, British Journal of Audiology, International Journal of Audiology." British Journal of Audiology, 35(6), pp. 327–328
This paper describes a comparison of the electroacoustic characteristics of five hearing aids: (1) a linear BTE aid of the type dispensed under the UK National Health Service (NHS), the BE19; (2) an analogue programmable BTE aid incorporating two-channel wide dynamic range compression, the ReSound BT2; (3) and (4) two digital BTE aids incorporating multi-channel wide dynamic range compression, the Phonak Claro and the Danavox Danalogic; (5) a disposable ITE hearing aid with single-channel compression, the Songbird. Measurements of frequency response using a 2 cc coupler showed that the NHS aid had a distinct undesired peak around 1 kHz. The response rolled off at low and high frequencies, and no gain was applied above about 4000 Hz. The BT2 and Claro both showed somewhat irregular responses with effective upper frequency limits of 5000-6000 Hz. The Danalogic had a reasonably smooth response and provided gain up to 6000 Hz. The Songbird had a smooth response and provided gain up to about 7000 Hz. All aids showed reasonably low harmonic and intermodulation distortion (probably below audible levels for hearing-impaired listeners), the Phonak Claro being the best in this respect. Measures of the effective input noise were obtained using two new methods. The NHS aid had the highest (worst) effective input noise, whereas the Songbird had the lowest, especially at low frequencies. The BT2 and the two digital aids had similar noise levels on one measure, but the BT2 was superior on the other measure. The compression circuits were characterized by measuring attack and release times and by using a method described by Stone and Moore (1992). The aids varied markedly in the extent to which they compressed amplitude modulation at the rates typically occurring in speech (2-10 Hz), the Claro providing the least compression and the Danalogic and Songbird aids providing the most. Overall, the results indicate that the NHS aid performed more poorly in several respects than the other aids. There were no great differences in electroacoustic characteristics between the remaining analogue aids and the digital aids, although the Songbird had a somewhat wider frequency range and lower effective input noise than the other aids.
A series of experiments have been performed with the primary aim of assessing the performance of a signal-processing algorithm for a possible future hearing aid application. As part of this work the four alternative auditory feature (FAAF) test was used to obtain a quantitative assessment of speech intelligibility and a subjective assessment of speech quality. This paper reports results of experiments using normal hearing (NH) subjects that provide partial verification of the FAAF test originators' prior work. Also reported are intelligibility score, mean opinion score (MOS) and completion time data obtained by use of the
The influence of hearing loss and aging on the perceptual organization of sound sequences was investigated by comparing the ability of young normal-hearing subjects and elderly subjects having either impaired or normal hearing for their age to form perceptual auditory streams from sequences of harmonic complex tones as a function of differences in fundamental frequency (F0). The sequences consisted of repeating triplets of harmonic complex tones separated by a silence (ABA-). In conditions in which the F0s of the A and B tone were so low that the harmonics could not be individually resolved by the peripheral auditory system even in the young normal-hearing subjects, those subjects showed similar stream segregation performance to the elderly hearing-impaired subjects. In contrast, when the F0s of the tones were high enough for the harmonics to be largely resolved at the auditory periphery in normal-hearing subjects, but presumably unresolved in the elderly subjects, the former showed significantly more stream segregation than the latter. These results, which cannot be consistently explained in terms of age differences, suggest that auditory stream segregation is adversely affected by reduced peripheral frequency selectivity of elderly individuals. This finding has implications for the understanding of the listening difficulties experienced by elderly individuals in cocktail-party situations.
The application of the maximum length sequence (MLS) technique to the recording of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) allows for a reduction in test time by one to two orders of magnitude. This is because the technique permits the use of extremely high click rates, as inter-click intervals are not constrained to be greater than the duration of the response. However, increasing the click rate also causes a progressive reduction in amplitude, or 'suppression', of the CEOAE. The origin of this suppression is unclear, with diverse suggestions in the literature as to its nature and mechanism. This paper presents a simple model of the well-known compressive non-linearity of the CEOAE level function, based on a static amplitude non-linearity within each of a number of narrowband frequency channels. The response of the model to MLS stimulation demonstrates suppression broadly of the form and magnitude previously reported in experimental studies. Furthermore, the model exhibits the generation of additional non-linear components that have been speculated on in connection with CEOAE recordings using the MLS technique. It is concluded that the MLS suppression phenomenon is derived largely, if not entirely, from the static non-linearity of the CEOAE level function. The approach to modelling the phenomenon as described here also bears promise for understanding various aspects of non-linearity in MLS-based CEOAE recordings.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE obtained from 2-month-old infants as a function of filter cut-off frequency, activity states and pass/fail status of infants. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, 100 2-month-old infants (200 ears) in five activity states (asleep, awake but peaceful, sucking a pacifier, feeding, restless) were tested by use of TEOAE technology. Five different filter conditions were applied to the TEOAE responses post hoc. The filter conditions were set at 781 Hz (default setting), 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.6 kHz. Results from this experiment showed that TEOAE parameters such as whole-wave reproducibility (WR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.8 kHz and 1.6 kHz, changed as a function of the cut-off frequency. The findings suggest that the 1.6 kHz and 1.2 kHz filter conditions are optimal for WR and SNR pass/fail criteria, respectively. Although all infant recordings appeared to benefit from the filtering, infants in the noisy states seemed to benefit the most. In Experiment 2, the high-pass filtering technique was applied to 23 infants (35 ears) who apparently failed the TEOAE tests on initial screening but were subsequently awarded a pass status based on the results from a follow-up auditory brainstem response (ABR) assessment. The findings showed a significant decrease in noise contamination of the TEOAE with a corresponding significant increase in WR. With high-pass filtering at 1.6 kHz, 21/35 ears could be reclassified into the pass category.
"A special event: the Keele BSA meeting, September 2000." British Journal of Audiology, 35(2), pp. 113–114
(2001). British Society of Audiology Short Papers Meeting on Experimental Studies of Hearing and Deafness. University of Keele, 21-22 September 2000. British Journal of Audiology: Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 115-164.
The terms 'sensitivity' and 'specificity' are defined and some of the factors that determine their values are discussed in the context of screening for permanent childhood hearing loss. There is a need to distinguish between the values observed in 'simple experiments' and those that may be obtained under more realistic 'field' conditions. It is not feasible to give a meta-analytic overview of published data because of the variety of methods and objectives used in those studies published in the literature. However, a qualitative synthesis of the data is possible. This suggests that most proposed neonatal hearing screening tests, when implemented in accordance with a programme of quality assurance, can be reasonably accurate at a modest cost. However, the optimal combination of tests and test parameters for given populations has not yet been fully researched. The infant distraction test screen has a lower sensitivity than neonatal hearing screening tests, particularly for moderate impairments, accompanied by a fairly low specificity.
Abstract The aim of the present study was to systematically review the clinical and cost effectiveness of hearing aids which use digital signal processing relative to other forms of hearing aid technology, in particular analogue-based aids. A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials, randomized crossover trials and economic studies was undertaken. Trial quality assessment and data extraction were undertaken by two independent reviewers. Eight trials comparing digital to non-digital devices were identified - one randomized controlled trial and seven randomized crossover trials. The majority of these studies were of small sample size and of poor methodological quality. In the majority of cases (nine out of 13), there was no evidence of a significant difference in either laboratory scores (nine out of 13 outcomes assessed) or user function/quality of life scores (six out of nine outcomes assessed) between digital and non-digital devices. In addition, there was no significant difference in patient preference for digital compared to control aids (relative risk 1.93; 95% CI 0.70-5.35) when pooled across studies. No cost-effectiveness studies directly comparing digital to non-digital devices were identified. In conclusion, the evidence identified by this review provides no significant evidence of the clinical benefit of digital devices compared to analogue-based aids. However, these results arc difficult to generalize to current UK practice as the analogue aids and types of fitting in the trials are not (hose typically used in the NHS
The electroacoustic characteristics of a hearing instrument are normally selected for individuals using data obtained during audiological assessment. The precise inter-relationship between the electroacoustic and audiometric variables is most readily appreciated when they have been measured at the same reference point, such as the tympanic membrane. However, it is not always possible to obtain the real-ear sound pressure level (SPL) directly if this is below the noise floor of the probe-tube microphone system or if the subject is unco-operative. The real-ear SPL may be derived by adding the subject's real-ear to dial difference (REDD) acoustic transform to the audiometer dial setting. The aim of the present study was to confirm the validity of the Audioscan RM500 to measure the REDD with the ER-3A insert earphone. A probe-tube microphone was used to measure the real-ear SPL and REDD from the right ears of 16 adult subjects ranging in age from 22 to 41 years (mean age 27 years). Measurements were made from 0.25 kHz to 6 kHz at a dial setting of 70 dB with an ER-3A insert earphone and two earmould configurations: the EAR-LINK foam ear-tip and the subjects' customized skeleton earmoulds. Mean REDD varied as a function of frequency but was typically approximately 12 dB with a standard deviation (SD) of +/- 1.7 dB and +/- 2.7 dB for the foam ear-tip and customized earmould, respectively. The mean test-retest difference of the REDD varied with frequency but was typically 0.5 dB (SD 1 dB). Over the frequency range 0.5-4 kHz, the derived values were found to be within 5 dB of the measured values in 95% of subjects when using the EAR-LINK foam ear-tip and within 4 dB when using the skeleton earmould. The individually measured REDD transform can be used in clinical practice to derive a valid estimate of real-ear SPL when it has not been possible to measure this directly.
It is not always possible to undertake extensive real-ear measurements, especially in infants and young children. An alternative approach is to estimate the real-ear SPL by use of an acoustic transform function such as the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD). This may be used to estimate the real-ear sound pressure level (SPL) obtained from an insert transducer or a hearing instrument. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of tympanic membrane perforation on the RECD transform function. Subjects in the study comprised two groups of 12 individuals aged between nine and 65 years. One group of subjects had a tympanic membrane perforation and was recruited to the study before admission for myringoplasty. There was no evidence of middle ear pathology in the remaining subjects who comprised the control group. An RECD transform function for an insert transducer was measured on each subject using the standard clinical protocol on the Audioscan RM500 real-ear measurement system. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups; mean RECD transform value of the perforation group was 9-12 dB lower than the corresponding value in the control group at audiometric frequencies below 1.5 kHz. This difference is probably due to the perforation acting as a vent and allowing low-frequency acoustic energy to escape into the middle ear cavity. Use of an average RECD transform function to estimate real-ear SPL in subjects with a perforation will overestimate the SPL reaching the tympanic membrane. As a result, the derived real-ear SPL obtained by use of either an insert transducer or a hearing instrument will be overestimated. This has implications for the selection and verification of a hearing instrument. The difference in the mean RECD transform function between the control group and subjects with a tympanic membrane perforation supports the use of individually measured RECD values wherever possible.
Quality monitoring and assurance is a key aspect of evidence-based service provision in health and education. Part I of the present paper summarizes the results from a survey in which performance of health-based paediatric audiology services in the UK was assessed against existing good practice guidelines (NDCS, 1994, 1996). The results of the survey indicated varied levels of provision, with guidelines commonly not followed. Part II of the paper reports the detailed development of two short questionnaires designed to provide scores (out of 100) reflecting aspects of service quality in paediatric audiology services and in early deaf education services. The results from the use of the two indices (the Paediatric Audiology Service Index (PASI) and the Deaf Education Early Service Index (DEESI)) are presented along with data from some component questions. Although some services are functioning close to guideline levels of service, the overall distribution of scores is such as to raise serious concerns about the variability of quality and the consequent inequity of provision for children with permanent hearing loss and their families in both health and education services.
