• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

    Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

    JournalISSN 0342-4642eISSN 1432-1238中科院 医学 1区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(32731)

    排序
    1NewConsensus on a Core Outcome Set for Ventilation Trials in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Brain Injury: Results of an International Delphi Consensus Study
    Nicholas Fong,Gregory Burns, Justin Phillips,Jean Digitale, Ali Ghasemian,Raphaël Cinotti,Julian Bösel,Chiara Robba,Robert D. Stevens,Romain Pirracchio

    Clinical research evaluating mechanical ventilation liberation in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) shows substantial outcome heterogeneity, limiting evidence synthesis. We aimed to develop an internationally endorsed core outcome set (COS) and a hierarchical composite endpoint for ventilation trials in neurocritical care. Following COS-STAD/COS-STAP standards, we conducted a 4-round international Delphi study. Candidate outcomes were identified via a scoping review. A multidisciplinary panel from 31 countries scored outcomes using a 9-point GRADE scale. Inclusion required >70

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2NewVibroacoustic Music Therapy for Postoperative Delirium in the ICU: the VIMUD-ICU Single-Center Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial
    Petra Burzlaff,Philipp Simon, Peter Michael von der Nahmer,Susanne Metzner,Philipp Deetjen
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3NewVasopressors As Immunomodulators: a Hidden Axis in Septic Shock
    Daniel E. Leisman,Matthijs Kox,Peter Pickkers
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4NewICU Resilience, Stress and Support: Perceptions of ICU Professionals in an International ESICM Survey
    Jan J. De Waele,Emilio Rodriguez-Ruiz,Maurizio Cecconi
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5NewTreating Sepsis by Targeting Neutrophil Extracellular Traps: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Carley Fowler,Bahareh Razmand, Sebastian Togatorop,Miklós Lipcsey,Robert Frithiof,Stephanie Franzén

    Abstract Background Sepsis, a leading cause of death worldwide, is characterized by dysregulated host immune responses and multi-organ dysfunction. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are extracellular fibers from activated neutrophils that contribute to the immune response. However, excessive NETs formation during sepsis may exacerbate inflammation, thrombosis, and tissue injury, potentially affecting sepsis prognosis. We examined whether NETs-modulating interventions are beneficial in experimental sepsis models. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, this review analyzed studies from PubMed and Scopus that reported NETs-targeting therapies and included outcome measures. A meta-analysis of random-effects models using a restricted maximum likelihood estimation was performed with a priori moderators including NETs quantification tier, intervention timing relative to insult, and intervention class. Results In 33 included studies, the therapies significantly reduced NETs levels, while three studies increased NETs following treatment. The a priori moderators, NETs tier and treatment timing, were not significant, whereas intervention class significantly modified treatment effects. The treated groups had a lower risk of death and reduced IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-ɑ levels when compared to the control group. The treatments reduced tissue injury with considerable heterogeneity (I 2 =68.4%) and should be cautiously interpreted due to small study numbers. NETs modulation was significantly associated with a decrease in cytokine concentration and tissue injury. The heterogeneity of protocols, diverse outcome measures, publication bias, and overall poor reporting quality of the studies warranted conservative effect estimates and cautious interpretation of findings. Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests NETs modulation is associated with reduced mortality risk, attenuated organ injury, and decreased inflammation, based primarily on LPS endotoxemia rodent models. Notably, experimental protocols and model limitations impede the translatability of these therapies for clinical care at this stage of research. Trial registration In accordance with the guidelines, our systematic review protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number CRD420251124339 and was published with INPLASY on 20 August 2025

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 32731 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    Jean Louis Vincent71882330
    Mitchell M Levy4122931
    Rui Paulo Moreno3378026
    Andrew Rhodes3241594
    Lambert G Thijs3231529
    H. Bruining318225
    A de Mendonça313973
    S. Willatts313944
    Suter Peter M305322
    Derek C. Angus2902751

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Jean Louis Vincent71882330
    Laurent Brochard17889271
    Elie Azoulay14620270
    Giuseppe Citerio11853182
    Mervyn Singer5104180
    Daniel De Backer13985174
    Luciano Gattinoni16007173
    Rinaldo Bellomo16703169
    Samir Jaber10114154
    Jean François Timsit8878149

    相关期刊

    Journal of Critical Care
    Critical care medicine
    European journal of intensive care medicine
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Thrombosis Research
    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
    Critical Care
    Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
    Annals of intensive care
    Journal of Intensive Care Medicine