As advances in VAD technology continue, the biggest challenge becomes the ability to stay abreast of all the emerging devices and the evolutions in management and care. Various resources are available which provide guidelines and standards to enable providers in the care of patients with VADs (see Table 6). It is incumbent upon caregivers to disseminate information as it is gained through observations and experience with VADs. The literature must remain current and accessible to all caregivers in order to ensure optimal management of patients with VADs.
Previous phase II studies of continuous infusion Fluorouracil (5-FU) (CI 5-FU) in refractory metastatic breast cancer have shown modest activity with low toxicity. Its activity in a first-line setting has not been formally tested. Patients were eligible if they fulfilled the following criteria: metastatic breast cancer; measurable or evaluable disease, no prior chemotherapy in the metastatic setting; ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2: adequate bone marrow and liver function. Patients were treated with 5-FU 250 mg/m2 per day by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 weeks in a 6-week cycle. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. In addition to the traditional endpoints of response, survival, and toxicity, quality of life was assessed with the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) and the Symptom Distress Scale (SDS). Twenty-one patients were enrolled. Among the 16 patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 44% (95% CI 20%, 68%) with CR rate 13% and PR rate 31%. The median duration of response was 37 weeks. Responses were not observed in patients with visceral (lung or liver) disease. Among all 21 patients in the study, the median time to disease progression was 12 weeks, and median overall survival was 64 weeks. Grade 1 or 2 mucosal and cutaneous toxicity were common. Only 4 patients (19%) had toxicity greater than grade 2; three patients had grade 3 mucositis, and 1 patient developed an indwelling catheter infection requiring its removal. Among responding patients, mean FLIC scores improved from 114.3 at baseline to 128.7 at week 8 (p = 0.11). Symptoms reported on the SDS generally improved in responding patients. Continuous infusion 5-FU as a first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer has moderate activity and low toxicity. Its use should be considered in the first-line setting when toxicity needs to be minimized.
A total of 55 patients with measurable colorectal metastatic carcinoma were studied to evaluate the impact on toxicity, response, and survival of protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-FU 200 mg/m2 per day with Cis-DDP 80 mg/m2 or carboplatin 300 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, 1-hour infusion. Patients received continuous uninterrupted therapy until there were signs or symptoms of toxicity. Both 5-FU and cisplatin were withheld when patients experienced grade II stomatitis and diarrhea, severe nausea or vomiting not controlled by standard antiemetic therapy, and clinically significant hand-foot syndrome. The toxicity was neurological (20% grade 2 and 3) hematological (13% grade 2) and dermatological (11% grade 2). The overall response (CR+PR) was 24% with a median survival of 13 months. The results of our study show that there is no improvement in response rate, response duration or survival compared with historical trials. However, this study does confirm the valuable palliative role of the protracted 5-FU infusion treatment. Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common neoplasms in Western societies, being second only to lung cancer as a cause of death from malignancy. The management of nonmetastatic primary disease in surgical, with adjuvant chemotherapy for those at high risk of relapse. However, for those with metastatic disease at diagnosis or recurrent disease after resection, cytotoxic chemotherapy is the treatment of choice and fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most active cytotoxic agent in this disease, with a response rate of approximately 20%. Efforts to improve the response rate have focused on the use of agents to modulate 5 FU. The Southwestern Oncology Group (SWOG) study reported by Leichman et al. (1) and a study from the United Kingdom by Hill et al. (2) compared conventional FU to modulated FU and found no improvement in response rate or survival. In the SWOG study, two different schedules of bolus FU and LV were compared with bolus FU alone and to continuous infusion FU administered alone or modulated by LV or PALA. In this study, the results obtained with bolus FU were superior to most of the studies in the literature: The response rate was 26%, and the median survival was 14 months. The high- and low-dose LV and FU groups showed response rates and survival similar to bolus FU alone. However, in 12 previously reported randomized studies comparing FU and LV or FU alone, nine reported that the combination of FU and LV produced significant increases in response rates and two reported significant increase in survival (3, 4). Many of these trials used the dose schedules reported in the SWOG trial. Protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-FU has been shown to have superior efficacy with less toxicity in colorectal cancer when compared to bolus 5-FU and synergy between cisplatin and 5-FU has been demonstrated in vitro. Consequently, we have investigated the efficacy of the combination of bolus cis or carboplatin and PVI 5 FU in 55 patients with advanced colorectal cancer using survival, response rate, symptomatic response, and toxicity as study endpoints.
Ninety-five patients with metastatic pancreatic (n = 38) or gastric (n = 57) carcinomas were treated by 5-day continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus cisplatin in two parallel phase II trials. 5-fluorouracil was given at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days and cisplatin was given on day 2 at a dose of 100 mg/m2. The total number of cycles administered was 425, and each patient received a median number of four cycles. Severe toxicities were observed in around 20% of the patients and 2 toxic deaths occurred. Response rate assessed in 92 evaluable patients was 34%. The overall median survival was 8 months. There were no clinical or biological factors predictive of response, but a better survival was observed in patients with objective response and CA 19-9 blood levels lower than 100 UI/I. These two predictive factors are independent when tested in a multivariate model. The combination of infusion 5-FU plus cisplatin can be considered as a standard for the treatment of gastric metastatic carcinomas and as a promising schedule for pancreatic carcinomas.
The term "infusion" is generally equated with the parental administration of drugs in a continuous mode of delivery over some unspecified length of time. However, in terms of applicability to this paper, ICC will imply a minimum of a 24-hour delivery schedule and may include four to 7-day schedules up to protracted infusions covering many weeks. Infusional Cancer Chemotherapy programs may employ a single drug used with or without concomitant radiation therapy or admixtures of two and three drugs. Sequential alternating infusions of drug admixtures are a common mode of treatment which allow maximization of dose with minimal side effects and toxicities. The ICC model is based on the tenet that the quality of the program is directly related to the safety, efficiency, and continuity of the care provided. The supporting structures of an ICC program are rooted in four administrative and technical requisites. Strategies for program support include: 1) a team to carry out the treatment approach and to provide instructional and physical care support; 2) pre-established guidelines, protocols, policies, and procedures by which to administer the program; 3) achievement of a safe and reliable means of venous access which promotes the outpatient status; 4) a source for an accurate and reliable ambulatory infusion device and delivery system. A referral base may encompass a wide geographical area, and the patient population may be varied as to ethnicity, intellectual capacity, age, level of activity, family support and life style, thus it is important to develop a program to support the majority of patients as opposed to the carefully selected few.
UNLABELLED:Our Phase II study results demonstrating high efficacy and low toxicity for a weekly schedule of high-dose 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (HD5-FU/FA) in intensively pretreated metastatic breast cancer prompted addition of paclitaxel to this regimen in a phase I/II study in outpatients.TREATMENT:Patients were treated with HD5-FU (24-hour infusion)/FA (2h infusion prior to FU) weekly for 6 weeks (d1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36) and Paclitaxel (3-hour infusion) was administered additionally on day 1 and day 22, q day 50. During Phase I we chose the following dose levels (dl): Fixed doses of FA d11-4 500 mg/m2 followed by HDFU, 24-hour infusion d11: 1.5, d12: 1.8, d13 and d14: 2.0 g/m2. .3-hour infusion of Paclitaxel on day 1 and day 22 d11 to d13: 135. d14: 175 mg/m2. D14 was chosen to be further evaluated during phase II. Results of an interim analysis were presented.PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:46 patients entered this trial during phase II and had the following characteristics: age 46 years (26 to 70) WHO performance status 0/1, metastatic disease sites 2.5(1 to 4). All patients had bidimensionally measurable disease. PRETREATMENT: 9 patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy, 16 patients prior chemotherapy for metastasis, and 21 both adjuvantly and for metastasis. Of 29 anthracycline-pretreated patients, 25 had anthracycline-resistant disease.RESULTS:We observed the following results in 35 evaluable patients: CR 3% (1/35), PR 51% (18/35), SD 40% (14/35). PD 6% (2/35). RR (Response rate) was 54%, 95% confidence interval 36 to 76%. The response concerning 20 patients with anthracycline resistant disease was: RR 55% (11/20). Median number of treatment cycles per patient was 3 (1 to 5), time to maximum response 2 months (1 to 5), remission duration 8+ months (2 to 17). Median survival time is not yet reached.CONCLUSIONS:The combination of paclitaxel with weekly HDFU/FA is well tolerated in the second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer and indicates high efficacy also in anthracycline-resistant disease. In an ongoing phase II study, we examine the addition of cisplatin to the regimen in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Those trials confirm that infusional weekly HD-5-FU plus folinic acid is of considerable interest in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Randomized studies are warranted.
To improve the therapeutic ratio of palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was administered as weekly high-dose 24-hour continuous infusion in combination with leucovorin (LV) and interferon-alpha-2b (IFN) as biomodulating agents: Chemotherapy consisted of a weekly schedule of 500 mg/m2 leucovorin as a 2-hour infusion, followed by a 24-hour continuous infusion of 2500 mg/m2 5-FU. IFN was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 3 mio I.E. three times a week. In patients with gastric carcinoma, etoposide (VP) 100 mg/m2 as 30-minute bolus infusion was added. Eighty-five patients (colorectal: 55 points, gastric: 30 points) are evaluable for response, toxicity, and survival analysis. Colorectal: CP+PR: 19/55 (34.5%), NC: 25/55 (45.5%), PD: 11/55 (20.0%). Median duration of remission in months (90% confidence interval): 5.2 (3.1 to 9.2), median survival since the start of salvage chemotherapy: 13.9 months (12.3 to 20.1), from initial diagnosis of metastasis: 30.2 months (26.3 to 44.5). Gastric: CR: 8/30 (26.7%), PR: 14/30 (46.6), NC: 5/30 (16.7), PD: 3/30 (10.0%). Median duration of remission in months (90% confidence interval): 6.75 (1.5 to 16.2), median survival since start of chemotherapy: 15.1 months (90% confidence interval 11.8 to 20.3 months). Hematologic toxicity: hemoglobin: I: 20.0%, II: 10.0%, leukocytes: I: 13.3%, II: 33.3%, III: 16.6%, platelets: I: 10.0% and III: 3.3%. Hematologic toxicity was moderate to negligible, peripheral toxicity consisted mainly of tolerable stomatitis and diarrhea. Dose and schedule intensified weekly 5-FU combination therapy in metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer is highly active in terms of response and median survival time. Chemotherapy pretreated patients with colorectal cancer seem to have a substantial survival benefit with this salvage protocol.
5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the best available drug for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. A review of published data strongly suggest that with continuous infusion an enhanced treatment outcome as opposed to treatment with standard bolus injections can be obtained. This could be due to the schedule, the high dose-intensity or both. It is likely that there exists a relationship between the dose intensity of 5-FU and the response in colorectal cancer. With weekly 24 to 48 hours continuous infusion of 5-FU a very high dose intensity can be achieved. High-dose infusional 5-FU is noncross-resistent with (modulated) bolus 5-FU and the European experience with this treatment modality will be reviewed. The comparison of the activity of modulated "standard" bolus 5-FU versus high-dose infusional 5-FU, given by weekly intermittent or by protracted continuous infusion (PCI), is the subject of ongoing trials. Additional studies will answer the question whether modulation of high-dose 5-FU will result in a superior treatment outcome compared with high-dose 5-FU alone.
Background In a previous phase I to II trial, we have shown that the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in 48-hour continuous infusion (CI) weekly was 3.5 gr/m2. In a subsequent confirmative phase II trial with 85 evaluable patients, a 38.5% response rate was obtained and the median survival reached was 12 months. These data were comparable to those achieved by biochemical modulation of 5-FU with Leucovorin. On this basis we tried to modulate high-dose 5-FU (3 gr/m2) with oral leucovorin (LV) but the regimen was too toxic and the dose had to be reduced. A new phase II trial with 2 g/m2/week plus oral leucovorin was planned. Patients received a median dose intensity of 5-FU of 1.6 g/m2/week (range 0.9-2). Three complete responses and 36 partial responses were observed. Overall response rate was 37.5% (95% CI, 28% to 46.8%). Median time to progression has been 7.4 months, and median survival 14.4 months. WHO grade 3 diarrhea was seen in 27 patients (24.5%). Grade 3 mucositis was also seen in 9 (8.1%) patients, and grade 4 was observed in one. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting was reported in 13 (11.7%) patients. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was detected in only 5 (4.5%) patients. Grade 4 leukopenia was observed in 1 case and grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia was observed in two cases, respectively. Oral leucovorin modulation of weekly 48-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU at 2 g/m2 is an active regimen, with diarrhea and mucositis as main limiting toxicities. Its antitumor activity does not seem superior to that obtained with a weekly 48 hour continuous infusion of 5-FU alone at a dose of 3.5 g/m2.
Optimal support of the patient receiving infusional cancer chemotherapy (ICC) in the home setting is partially dependent on the provision of an infusional device that offers minimal complexity and maximal reliability and safety. The selection of the appropriate device is vital to positive patient outcomes and to the comfort level of both patient and care providers. This article presents issues and considerations in the selection of infusion devices and the nursing role in the management of patients utilizing such devices. Aspects of nursing management are presented from the perspective of The Cancer Center of Boston (TCC) model.
The role of nursing in infusional cancer chemotherapy (ICC) may vary depending on the practice setting. Nurses in free-standing centers and office practices perform many duties that nurses in other facilities may not, because of the lack of many of the supports that benefit hospitals with their multidepartmental and hierarchical structures. Nurses function collaboratively with physicians in the planning and the implementation of patient treatment. Patient-related nursing responsibilities include patient/family education, drug preparation and administration, patient assessment for treatment toxicity, recognition and management of complications related to the catheter or infusion device, and telephone triage. Other duties more removed from patient care might include inventory management, research data collection and management, quality assurance and improvement, compliance with regulatory issues, and a myriad of other responsibilities. The transition of patient care to the outpatient setting has broadened the scope of nursing to include nonpatient care responsibilities due to financial constraints brought about by health care reform, changes in reimbursement patterns, and overhead required to maintain and deliver quality patient care. As a result of nursing responsibilities, it becomes paramount that the aforementioned constructs for program support are in place and that all nurses are consistently trained and have a template to follow for patient treatment and management. Nursing ability to perform patient-related tasks should be proven by formal written and practical competencies repeated annually and as procedural changes are implemented. The paragraphs to follow suggest nursing management of patients receiving ICC using a model developed at The Cancer Center of Boston (TCC).
The French contribution to the development of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion in advanced colorectal cancer includes five randomized trials and specific researches on the 48-hour bimonthly regimen, chronotherapy, and individual dose adaptation. The bimonthly 48-hour LV5-FU bolus and infusion is the standard treatment outside the research protocols and the control arm of the ongoing trials.
Surveillance of the patient on infusional cancer chemotherapy (ICC) is paramount to patient safety. Key to this issue is diligence in monitoring for complications of infusion catheters. Nursing knowledge and awareness are essential for the early detection of such complications. The following is a composite of the manifestations of commonly experienced catheter-related complications. The incidence, detection and management issues are presented from the perspective of 15 years experience with ICC at The Cancer Center of Boston (TCC).
The EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group has conducted a randomized trial of high-dose infusional 5-fluorouracil (FU) with or without Methotrexate (MTX). FU was given as a 48-horus infusion of 60 mg/kg every week x 4, biweekly x 4, and subsequently every 3 weeks. Half of the patients also received 40 mg/m2 MTX as a bolus injection just prior to the FU infusion. A total of 312 patients were randomized. High-dose infusional FU was very well tolerated with virtually no haematological, renal, hepatic or cutaneous toxicity. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 35% and diarrhea in 24% of patients but was almost never severe. Cardiac toxicity and ataxia were seen in less than 5% of patients. Methotrexate lead to a significantly higher incidence of stomatitis, which was severe in 10% of patients. Eleven percent of the high-dose infusional FU patients showed an objective response with stabilization in an additional 35%; median survival was 9.3 months. With the addition of methotrexate a 23% response rate was seen (p = 0.025) and survival was 12.5 months (n.s.). We demonstrated the favorable therapeutic index tolaribility of high-dose (60 mg/kg), short-term (48 hours), frequent (weekly-biweekly) infusional FU and the ability of low-dose MTX to positivity modulate this FU treatment.
Based on preclinical data and the promising results being achieved with infusional 5-FU in colorectal and breast cancer, we investigated a weekly schedule of a 24-hour infusion of 5-FU plus folinic acid (HD-FU/FA) in patients failing to first-line chemotherapy and HD-FU/FA plus cisplatin (C) or plus cisplatin/epidoxorubicin (C/E) in chemo-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer. In all three trials the results achieved with the tested chemotherapy regimens indicated high activity and good tolerability. All three protocols were administered as outpatient treatment. With HD-FU/FA and overall response rate of 24% and a median survival time of 5 months was observed in 17 patients refractory to or relapsing after first-line chemotherapy. HD-FU/FA/C induced an overall response rate of 66% and a median survival time of 13 months. Of note was the high activity of this regimen in patients with malignant ascites. HD-FU/FA/C/E also proved to be an interesting regimen similar active as HD-FU/FA/C but it was subjectively less well tolerated. In patients with locally advanced disease the response rate was 90% (10/11), and in patients with distant metastases 50% (8/16).
CPT-11 is a camptothecin derivative with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity, both in vitro and in vivo. Like camptothecin, CPT-11 is a selective DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor. Phase I trials were conducted in Europe to determine the dose and schedule for phase II trials. These phase I trials assessed the toxicity of CPT-11 in 235 patients and tested three administration schedules: a single infusion once every 3 weeks; a weekly infusion for 3 out of 4 weeks; and a daily infusion for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 115 mg/m2 in the daily schedule and 145 mg/m2 in the weekly schedule. When the drug was administered once every 3 weeks, diarrhea became the dose-limiting toxicity at doses above 350 mg/m2. This schedule offered the highest dose intensity and the best tolerability profile, and was the most convenient for outpatient treatment. Finally, using this schedule, concomitant administration of high-dose loperamide allowed the dose of CPT-11 to be increased to 750 mg/m2. An ongoing phase I trial is investigating the combination of CPT-11 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in various solid tumors. Although the MTD has not yet been reached, preliminary results show no pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs, contrary to a previous Japanese study. Based on the results of the three phase I trials, CPT-11 350 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once every 3 weeks was recommended for phase II trials, which started in Europe in 1992. To date, CPT-11 has shown remarkable efficacy in colorectal cancer, even in patients resistant to 5-FU. Interesting results have also been obtained in pancreatic, cervical and lung cancers. Future trials will explore the place of CPT-11 in combination with other cytotoxic agents or radiotherapy.
Infusional chemotherapy has been increasingly used based upon the fact that most drugs have a relatively short half-life following bolus exposure, and increasing the available drug concentration over time may maximize the antitumor effect. As a practical matter, the application of infusional chemotherapy especially in an ambulatory setting, absolutely requires that the individual antineoplastic agents be stable in solution at room temperature (or at body temperature for implanted pump systems) and that the drugs in the infusion (including antiemetics) be compatible. The capacity to mix antineoplastic agents and antiemetics (also colony-stimulating factors) in a single solution facilitates infusional combination chemotherapy. Technologic advances are on the horizon which will provide the capability of administration of multiple drugs through a single access site to allow one to utilize a single delivery source obviating the need for admixtures of drugs. However, in the interim, admixtures represent the optimal method for the delivery of multi-agent chemotherapy in the setting in which continuous infusional drug delivery for 24 hours or more is employed. The goal of continuous infusion cancer chemotherapy is to ensure delivery of an unaltered cytotoxic drug, avoiding situations that could affect the stability of the infusion admixture. With cancer chemotherapy infusion therapy being administered through oncology clinics without the benefits of a pharmacist, the nurse plays a pivotal role in the preparation of the infusion, supervision of the patient, and when applicable in providing counseling on the proper storage, handling of the cytotoxic drugs, and disposal of contaminated infusion materials. Thus, by optimizing the integrity of the chemotherapeutic infusion, the patient achieves maximum benefits of cancer chemotherapy and the level of success anticipated with oncology care. The nurse may also be involved with clinical studies involving the preparation of other combinations of infusional chemotherapy including antiemetics and colony-stimulating factors, requiring integrity of the infusion to incompatibility and instability. In order to avoid failure of the infusion through improper preparation or reconstitution of the infusion or improper storage conditions and the resulting unnecessary waste and disposal expenses, the nurse needs to be fully aware of the factors affecting the stability and compatibility of the infusion and to interact with other health professionals and the literature for the critical information related to maintaining the integrity of the cancer chemotherapy infusion. "Good intentions without good communication equals potential disaster."
