• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Clinical Simulation in Nursing

    Clinical Simulation in Nursing

    JournalISSN 1876-1399eISSN 1876-1402中科院 医学 3区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(2312)

    排序
    1NewIt’s a Continuum: Simulation Facilitators’ Development of Emotional Intelligence in Debriefing
    Heather C. Epp,Bobbie Ann Adair White,Suzan Kardong-Edgren
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2NewShaping the Future of the Healthcare Workforce: Policy and Advocacy Recommendations on Simulation-Based Education
    Kristen M. Brown,S. Barry Issenberg,Yasuharu Okuda, K.T. Waxman,Robert K. Armstrong, Geoffrey T. Miller
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3NewBeyond Learning Outcomes: Simulation-based Nursing Education and Competency Development in Saudi Arabia
    Aseelah Alnazawi

    Background Simulation-based education is increasingly used in Saudi nursing education, but the outcomes reported in this literature often emphasize learner satisfaction, self-confidence, knowledge, and short-term skills rather than competency development. Aim This structured narrative review critically examines how learning outcomes are reported in Saudi simulation-based nursing education and the extent to which these outcomes support claims about competency development. Methods A structured narrative review was conducted of English-language, peer-reviewed empirical studies published between January 2016 and April 2026. Searches were undertaken in CINAHL, MEDLINE via Ovid, Web of Science Core Collection, and Scopus, with an exploratory search used to refine key terms. The review was informed by SANRA and narrative synthesis principles. Data were extracted on study design, participants, simulation modality, outcomes, measurement tools, timing of assessment, and relevance to competency development. Methodological quality was considered using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results The literature showed a growing but methodologically varied evidence base. Reported outcomes clustered into three broad categories: cognitive and technical outcomes; psychological and learner-experience outcomes; and broader competency-oriented outcomes. Most studies reported positive immediate outcomes, particularly in knowledge, skills, satisfaction, confidence, self-efficacy, and perceived competence. However, fewer studies examined observed performance, retention, skill transfer, clinical judgment in action, or assessment against explicit competency frameworks. Conclusion Saudi simulation-based nursing education demonstrates clear educational value and learner acceptability. However, the current evidence more strongly supports short-term learning and positive learner experience than robust competency development. Future studies should align outcomes with competency frameworks, include performance-based and longitudinal assessment, and report simulation design and debriefing processes more transparently.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4NewBuilding Interprofessional Conflict De-Escalation Competencies Through High Fidelity Standardized Patient Simulation
    Natalya Pasklinsky, Kristy Deyeso, Mary Hickey
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5NewChallenges for Implementing Computer-Based Simulation in Competency-Based Nursing Education in Resource-Constrained Settings
    Vitória Talya dos Santos Sousa, Manuel Pardo Rios, John Hebert da Silva Felix,Patrícia Freire de Vasconcelos

    Background Competency-based nursing education increasingly incorporates computer-based simulation, including immersive virtual reality (IVR), yet implementation remains challenging in resource-constrained settings. Methods This conceptual, evidence-informed discussion examines the implementation of computer-based simulation in competency-based nursing education within resource-constrained higher education institutions. Results Implementation is limited by inadequate infrastructure, insufficient faculty development, lack of contextualized curricula, and misalignment between assessment and competency frameworks. Sustainable adoption depends more on pedagogical, curricular, and institutional readiness than technological sophistication. Context-sensitive strategies include curriculum mapping, faculty development, institutional partnerships, and affordable simulation alternatives. Conclusions These approaches can promote equitable, sustainable competency development in nursing education.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 2312 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    Colleen Meakim121817
    Sharon Decker113121
    Susan Prion101247
    Lori Lioce86910
    Suzan Kardong-Edgren85335
    Ashley E. Franklin80821
    Katie Adamson76133
    Guillaume Alinier7496
    teri boese73813
    Bette Mariani71318

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Susan Prion101247
    B. Nicole Harder67744
    Suzie Kardong-Edgren63044
    Suzan Kardong-Edgren85335
    Katie Adamson76133
    Marian Luctkar-Flude46430
    Mindi Anderson39925
    Cynthia L. Foronda63223
    Margaret Anne Verkuyl55623
    Kim Leighton71122

    相关期刊

    Journal of continuing education in nursing
    Nursing education perspectives
    International journal of nursing education scholarship
    Nurse Education in Practice
    Nurse Education Today
    Journal of Professional Nursing
    Annual review of nursing research
    Nurse Educator
    Teaching and Learning in Nursing
    Journal of Nursing Education