Adam Looney of David Eccles School of Business, University of Utah, and the Brookings Institution reviews “Bankers in the Ivory Tower: The Troubling Rise of Financiers in US Higher Education” by Charlie Eaton. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the relationship between rising student loan debt and the growth of concentrated endowment wealth, explaining how the resurgent power of financiers is tied to increasing inequality in higher education and America as a whole.”
David Autor of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and NBER reviews “The Means of Prediction: How AI Really Works (and Who Benefits)” by Maximilian Kasy. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Presents a framework for understanding how artificial intelligence (AI) will proceed in a society that is shaped by power and inequality, focusing on the limits of AI and how it can be made to work for all people.”
Edward L Glaeser of Harvard University reviews “Chicago before the Fire: An Economic History” by Louis P. Cain The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Examines the economic and business history of Chicago before the Great Fire of 1870, focusing on how the city's early growth and development determined its rise as the Midwest's dominant city.”
Raimundo Soto of Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile reviews “The Chile Project: The Story of the Chicago Boys and the Downfall of Neoliberalism” by Sebastian Edwards. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the rise and fall of the neoliberal model installed by US-influenced economists in Chile during the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet, highlighting the persistent inequality and struggle for income and wealth distribution underlying the Chilean model's success.”
In this paper, I examine what we know and don’t know about both private and public workforce development in the United States. I highlight three of the most important categories of programs and policy: (i) workforce development in accredited higher education institutions, particularly community colleges; (ii) other publicly funded or private training and services, including “sectoral training” that targets specific high-demand sectors of the economy; and (iii) on-the-job or work-based learning, including apprenticeships. I summarize the theoretical literature on workforce development and a broad landscape of the three key categories. I synthesize the empirical literature on workforce development, beginning with comparisons of different data sources, outcome measures, and empirical methods used before reviewing the literature on estimated impacts in each of the three categories. I then consider the international evidence on workforce development and how public efforts differ between the United States and other industrial countries before concluding. (JEL I23, I26, J24, J31, M53)
Michael D. Bordo of Rutgers University reviews “Shock Values: Prices and Inflation in American Democracy” by Carola Binder. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores how price fluctuations and attempts to manage them have shaped American democracy, analyzing examples of the disparate impacts of price fluctuations and their political consequences.”
Matthew Basilico of Harvard University reviews “Madness and Enterprise: Psychiatry, Economic Reason, and the Emergence of Pathological Value” by Nima Bassiri. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores how economic reasoning has been adopted by psychiatric clinicians and researchers in order to facilitate diagnostic assessments about potential psychiatric patients on the basis of their apparent economic behaviors, focusing on how economic value came to comprise part of the ontology of madness.”
Ofer Melamud of Northwestern University reviews “The Highest Exam: How the Gaokao Shapes China” by Ruixue Jia and Hongbin Li. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Describes the structure of China's education system as a centralized hierarchical tournament, focusing on how this system influences China's institutions and social life.”
Ethan Ilzetzki of London School of Economics reviews “King Dollar: The Past and Future of the World’s Dominant Currency” by Paul Blustein. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the US dollar's rise to global prominence, assessing the resilience of the dollar's dominance and its implications for US power and responsibility.”
This multi-book review argues that identity-driven polarization interacts with institutional design to erode democratic guardrails. Reading Heather Cox Richardson’s Democracy Awakening, Tom Schaller, and Paul Waldman’s White Rural Rage, and Ezra Klein’s Why We’re Polarized through an economist’s lens, I emphasize two claims. First, when institutions fail to deliver broadly shared security and dignity, anti-pluralist projects gain legitimacy and room to maneuver. Second, questions of belonging, citizenship, and the obligations of government to the people are informed by culture and institutional trust. The culture of the United States is not one that lends itself readily to ethno-nationalism, but these books make a case for an America that is, and perhaps has always, been divided by notions of who “we” are. I situate the books within the economics literature on populism, polarization, and institutions, and examine what we can learn about rebuilding both prosperity and democratic resilience in the United States. (JEL D02, D72, D91, J11, J15, Z13)
Vellore Arthi of University of California, Irvine, reviews “Controlling Contagion: Epidemics and Institutions from the Black Death to Covid” by Sheilagh Ogilvie. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the past seven centuries of history to investigate how human societies dealt with epidemic disease, highlighting the features that have made institutional frameworks better at coordinating responses to epidemics and better at devising innovations to improve societal learning.”
Ryan Bubb of University of Southern California reviews “Good Company: Economic Policy after Shareholder Primacy” by Lenore Palladino. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores how ending shareholder primacy and reorienting corporate decision-making toward productivity would work in practice, focusing on how board members, employees, managers, shareholders, customers, and the broader public would understand their rights and responsibilities if they were operating together in pursuit of economic innovation.”
Alex M. Thomas of School of Arts and Sciences, Azim Premji University reviews “Relocating Development Economics: The First Generation of Modern Indian Economists” by Maria Bach. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the work of the Early Nationalists, the first generation of modern economists in India in the mid- to late-nineteenth century, focusing on how they produced forward-thinking knowledge on economic development.”
Gabriel Scheffler of University of Miami School of Law reviews “The Licensing Racket: How We Decide Who Is Allowed to Work, and Why It Goes Wrong” by Rebecca Haw Allensworth. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the function of the professional licensing system, its effects on equality, public health, and the economy, and its role in the American Dream, emphasizing the need for a coherent, defensible theory for when licensing is required.”
Yueran Ma of University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, and NBER reviews “The Making of Modern Corporate Finance: A History of the Ideas and How They Help Build the Wealth of Nations” by Donald H. Chew Jr. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the significant potential of the corporate finance function to increase the efficiency and value of organizations, from publicly traded companies to nonprofit institutions and state-owned enterprises, promoting the argument that US private-sector productivity is the fundamental source of US economic and social wealth.”
Josh Lerner of Harvard University and NBER reviews “Patenting Life: Tales from the Front Lines of Intellectual Property and the New Biology” by Jorge Goldstein. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the legal, commercial, and social debates surrounding the patenting of biological materials, whether living single cells, whole plants or animals, or the inert molecules that they produce or from which they are made.”
William Roberds of Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta reviews “The Silver Empire: How Germany Created Its First Common Currency” by Oliver Volckart. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Examines the creation of Germany's first common currency, focusing on insights from recently discovered primary sources that help explain the purpose of the currency and the importance of the uneven availability of precious metals.”
Marshall Steinbaum of University of Utah reviews “Monopsony in Labor Markets: Theory, Evidence, and Public Policy” by Brianna L. Alderman and Roger D. Blair. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Explores the law and economics of wage-fixing agreements, no-poaching agreements, noncompete terms in labor contracts, unions and collective bargaining, mergers that affect labor markets, and wage discrimination.”
A large literature at the intersection of economics and finance offers prescriptions for regulating banks to increase financial stability. This literature abstracts from the discretion that accounting standards give banks over financial reporting, creating a gap between the information assumed to be available to regulators in models of optimal regulation and the information available to regulators in reality. We bridge insights from the economics, finance, and accounting literatures to synthesize knowledge about the design and implementation of bank regulation and identify areas where more work is needed. We present a simple framework for organizing the relevant ideas, namely the externalities that motivate bank regulation, the rationales for allowing accounting discretion, and the use of discretion to circumvent regulation. Our takeaway from reviewing work in these areas is that academic studies of bank regulation and accounting discretion require a more unified approach to design optimal policy for the real world.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a pervasive global issue, with approximately one in three women experiencing IPV during her lifetime. IPV prevalence is higher in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), and costs of IPV are also considerably larger as a percentage of GDP in LMICs. We present the economic theory behind IPV and highlight some important determinants, such as poverty and societal norms. We then synthesize the causal evidence on the impact of a range of policies and interventions, highlighting approaches that have been effective in reducing IPV. We identify key insights from the existing literature and outline areas where further theoretical and empirical research is needed. (JEL 132, J12, J16, K42, 015, 017, Z13)
