• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology

    Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology

    JournalISSN 1748-3107eISSN 1748-3115中科院 医学 4区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(2414)

    排序
    1Comparison of the Effects of Artificial Intelligence, Virtual Reality, and Traditional Balance Training Programs on Balance and Gait in Older Adults
    Saeed Yousefi Babadi,Ali Asghar Norasteh,Ali Shamsi Majelan
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2EquIPP-AT: a Framework Proposition for Examining Equity and Inclusion in Assistive Technology Assessment
    Angharad E. Beckett,Pedro Encarnação,Emma M. Smith

    PURPOSE Assistive technology (AT) assessment shapes access to products, services and supports. Although discussed as a clinical, technical and user-centred process, it has been less systematically examined as an equity and inclusion process. This article proposes EquIPP-AT, a provisional AT-specific adaptation of the Equity and Inclusion in Policy Processes framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS This first-stage development adapts EquIPP to AT assessment through evidence synthesis and expert judgement, informed by AT service delivery and outcome literature, Critical Disability Studies, epistemic injustice, the capabilities approach, and comparison with EquiFrame and ARISE. Cases from Norway and Brazil and donation-mediated wheelchair provision in Kenya and the Philippines are used illustratively across provision contexts. RESULTS EquIPP-AT is organised across three analytical levels: assessment governance and rules, assessment practices, and lived experience of assessment. It applies nine equity dimensions: participation and involvement; individual needs and circumstances; accessibility and reasonable adjustments; leadership, governance and accountability; data, evidence and monitoring; organisational commitment and culture; experiential expertise and co-production; communication and influence; and partnership and collaboration. Four contextual axes are identified: structural variation, marginality and precarity, cultural-epistemic difference, and temporality. It applies across professional-led, peer-supported, collaborative, commercial and self-directed assessment routes. CONCLUSION EquIPP-AT is a provisional analytical framework, not a validated instrument. It supports systematic inquiry into how AT assessment processes include, exclude, recognise, constrain or enable AT users. Its levels, dimensions and axes remain propositions requiring testing and refinement through consultation and participatory development with AT users and Disabled People's Organisations, followed by empirical piloting across contrasting contexts.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3Design and Analysis of an Affordable Manual Sit-to-stand Wheelchair for Disabled Individuals
    Tushar Tiwari, Harshit,Pranab K. Dan
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Interval-based Cycling for Wheelchair Users with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Feasibility, Tolerability, and Exercise Effects
    Sophia Vera Frølich, Noémie Receveur,John Vissing,Nanna Scharff Poulsen
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5Mobility Devices, Social Inclusion and Participation in Youth with Disabilities: a Scoping Review
    Pegah Firouzeh, Alexis Szilagy,Briano Di Rezze
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 2414 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    François Routhier91146
    Tom Chau89015
    Rory Cooper84245
    Elaine Biddiss6725
    Malcolm Maclachlan66415
    Emma Maria Smith65217
    Johan Borg64412
    William C. Miller63028
    Natasha Layton56021
    Scherer Marcia J51017

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    François Routhier91146
    Rory Cooper84245
    R. Lee Kirby49929
    William C. Miller63028
    W. Ben Mortenson19125
    Krista L Best26322
    Paula W Rushton45821
    Natasha Layton56021
    Lisa K Kenyon11019
    Mark Schmeler23818

    相关期刊

    Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy
    International journal of telerehabilitation
    Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    American Journal of Occupational Therapy
    Assistive Technology
    Technology and Disability
    Journal of Enabling Technologies
    British Journal of Occupational Therapy
    Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology
    JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies