• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    JAMA internal medicine

    JAMA internal medicine

    JournalISSN 2168-6106eISSN 2168-6114中科院 医学 1区

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(7822)

    排序
    1NewRethinking the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) Program: Moving Toward Rigorous Evaluation of the FDA's Drug Safety Programs.
    Er-Bao Sun,Reshma Ramachandran
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2NewMifepristone Patient Agreement Form and Medication Abortion Knowledge: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    M. Biggs, K. Ehrenreich, S. Kaller,Lauren J. Ralph,Daniel Grossman

    Importance While the US Food and Drug Administration requires medication abortion patients to review and sign a patient agreement form (PAF) under its Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, there is limited research examining whether the PAF improves patient knowledge. Objective To determine whether patients are more knowledgeable about medication abortion after reviewing and signing the PAF. Design, Setting, and Participants People receiving mifepristone and misoprostol medications (15 years or older and proficient in English or Spanish) were recruited from 5 facilities in California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, and Minnesota (January to October 2025). After receiving standard clinic counseling and the mifepristone medication guide, patients were randomized into 2 study groups and then completed a survey either before (n = 301 control) or after (n = 292 exposed) receiving and signing the PAF. Data were analyzed December 2025 to August 2026. Intervention The control group completed the survey before receiving the PAF and any PAF-related counseling. The exposed group received and signed the PAF and any PAF-related counseling and then completed a knowledge survey. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall medication abortion knowledge (correct response to 12 items regarding when to seek medical care, effectiveness, administration, potential serious risks, and side effects) and responses to each individual knowledge item. Results A total of 593 participants (mean [SD] age, 26.9 [5.8] years; 44 Asian/Pacific Islander [7%], 132 Black [22%], 181 Hispanic [31%], and 159 White [27%] individuals) completed knowledge items (301 control [51%]; 292 exposed [49%]). Across participant characteristics, study groups only differed significantly in reported abortion history. In adjusted analyses, participants answered a mean (95% CI) of 10.37 (10.26-10.48) of 12 knowledge items consistently with the PAF with no study group differences (control: difference, 10.26; exposed: difference, 10.44; adjusted difference, 0.18; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.39). Nearly everyone knew to contact a "provider" if they "were to have an infection (590 [99%]) or heavy bleeding that soaked through 2 full-size sanitary pads per hour for 2 hours (566 [96%])." The items with answers that were least often concordant with the PAF included how often the treatment does not work (320 [54%]) and taking misoprostol 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone (458 [77%]). Conclusions and Relevance The randomized clinical trial found that patient knowledge about medication abortion following standard counseling was high. Exposure to the required PAF did not result in a clinically meaningful increase in medication abortion knowledge. The findings raise questions about the PAF requirement from the US Food and Drug Administration, as it does not appear to be useful. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07604675.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3NewThe Case for Multidimensional Optimization in Food is Medicine Interventions—Finding the Right Recipe—Reply
    Connor Drake, Susan E. Spratt, Michael Pignone
    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4NewPalpitations and Muscle Cramps in an Older Man
    Mohan Prasad Akkineni, Krishna Prasad Akkineni, Sudipta Mondal

    This case report describes a man in his 60s who presented with recurrent palpitations associated with dyspnea and a ringing sensation in his ears for the preceding 24 hours.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5NewMifepristone Patient Agreement Form and Medication Abortion Knowledge
    M. Antonia Biggs,Katherine Ehrenreich, Shelly Kaller, Lauren Ralph,Daniel Grossman

    Importance While the US Food and Drug Administration requires medication abortion patients to review and sign a patient agreement form (PAF) under its Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program, there is limited research examining whether the PAF improves patient knowledge. Objective To determine whether patients are more knowledgeable about medication abortion after reviewing and signing the PAF. Design, Setting, and Participants People receiving mifepristone and misoprostol medications (15 years or older and proficient in English or Spanish) were recruited from 5 facilities in California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, and Minnesota (January to October 2025). After receiving standard clinic counseling and the mifepristone medication guide, patients were randomized into 2 study groups and then completed a survey either before (n = 301 control) or after (n = 292 exposed) receiving and signing the PAF. Data were analyzed December 2025 to August 2026. Intervention The control group completed the survey before receiving the PAF and any PAF-related counseling. The exposed group received and signed the PAF and any PAF-related counseling and then completed a knowledge survey. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall medication abortion knowledge (correct response to 12 items regarding when to seek medical care, effectiveness, administration, potential serious risks, and side effects) and responses to each individual knowledge item. Results A total of 593 participants (mean [SD] age, 26.9 [5.8] years; 44 Asian/Pacific Islander [7%], 132 Black [22%], 181 Hispanic [31%], and 159 White [27%] individuals) completed knowledge items (301 control [51%]; 292 exposed [49%]). Across participant characteristics, study groups only differed significantly in reported abortion history. In adjusted analyses, participants answered a mean (95% CI) of 10.37 (10.26-10.48) of 12 knowledge items consistently with the PAF with no study group differences (control: difference, 10.26; exposed: difference, 10.44; adjusted difference, 0.18; 95% CI, −0.04 to 0.39). Nearly everyone knew to contact a “provider” if they “were to have an infection (590 [99%]) or heavy bleeding that soaked through 2 full-size sanitary pads per hour for 2 hours (566 [96%]).” The items with answers that were least often concordant with the PAF included how often the treatment does not work (320 [54%]) and taking misoprostol 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone (458 [77%]). Conclusions and Relevance The randomized clinical trial found that patient knowledge about medication abortion following standard counseling was high. Exposure to the required PAF did not result in a clinically meaningful increase in medication abortion knowledge. The findings raise questions about the PAF requirement from the US Food and Drug Administration, as it does not appear to be useful. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07604675

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 7822 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    Chaomin Wu112143
    Yanping Cai112092
    Dechang Chen110533
    Yuanlin Song110363
    Xiaoyan Chen110281
    Zeyong Yang110281
    Chunling Du110281
    Chunxue Bai110281
    JinJun Jiang110281
    Li Zhang110281

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Redberg Rita F1321157
    Mitchell Katz581108
    Joseph Ross207183
    Deborah Grady39371
    Aaron Seth Kesselheim200361
    Kenneth Covinsky210051
    Cary Gross110451
    Michael A Incze22245
    Sharon K. Inouye73041
    Robert Steinbrook38340

    相关期刊

    American Journal of Medicine
    Annals of internal medicine
    Canadian Medical Association journal
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
    Journal of General Internal Medicine
    Mayo Clinic proceedings
    Medical Journal Of Australia
    Lancet Public Health
    EClinicalMedicine
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report