The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the digital landscape. This offers both opportunities and challenges across multiple sectors, with cyber security emerging as a vulnerable domain. One growing concern is the rise of AI-enabled identity theft, which threatens the privacy and security of both individuals and institutions. India's laws on AI-enabled identity theft lack comprehensive coverage and enforcement. As a result, cybercriminals are often able to exploit these legal loopholes. This paper examines the current legal frameworks in India pertaining to identity theft. It also suggests practical steps to augment the legal frameworks to the effect of combating AI-enabled identity theft. By examining existing laws, regulations, and international best practices, this paper provides insights into the necessary legal reforms and technological interventions needed to strengthen India’s capacity to address the evolving risks associated with AI-enabled identity theft.
The handicraft industry plays a crucial and significant role in the country’s economy. It provides substantial employment opportunities for artisans in rural and semi-urban areas and contributes significantly to the nation’s foreign exchange earnings. Additionally, it plays a vital role in preserving our diverse cultural heritage. In India, Geographical Indication (GI) has emerged as an important aspect of intellectual property rights. GI acts as a powerful tool for preserving and recognizing the commercial value of unique products and their associated traditional knowledge. While GI certification has the potential to rejuvenate the handicraft sector, it is essential to recognize that viewing it solely as an intellectual property element could pose risks to the industry’s interests. This study provides an overview of the current status of registered GIs in India and highlights the total registration of GIs in the handicraft industry.
The problem of greenwashing, in which the sustainability credentials of financial products are overstated or misrepresented, has been highlighted by the growing popularity of eco-conscious investing. With an emphasis on intellectual property rights (IPR), this study investigates how well certification marks and eco-labels work to curb greenwashing. In order to guarantee authenticity and integrity in sustainability claims, several marks and labels are used. The study looks at cases of false labelling, false claims, and a lack of transparency, emphasising the negative effects of greenwashing, which include diminished confidence in the financial sector, capital misallocation, and a lag in the achievement of global sustainability objectives. The study highlights the need for regulatory oversight, the establishment of precise guidelines and standards for sustainable labelling, independent confirmation of sustainability claims, and open reporting on ESG practices as ways to combat greenwashing. Campaigns for investor education and awareness as well as cooperation amongst many stakeholders—including government organisations, financial institutions, and non-profits—are seen essential. To preserve the integrity of sustainable finance and make sure that investments actually benefit the environment and society while safeguarding investors' interests, it is crucial to combat greenwashing in eco-conscious investing. The report emphasises how crucial it is to promote accountability, ethics, and openness in sustainable financing.
