• 学术搜索
  • 科研智能体
    • Research Labs
    • AI 阅读
    • AI 文库
    • 深度研究
    • 学者亮点
  • 学术资源
    • AI2000
    • 期刊/会议
    • 学者库
    • 学术API
      MCP&Skill
    • 溯源树
    • 数据集
  • 知识沉淀
    • 学术空间
订阅小程序
旧版功能
aminer vip
开通会员低至0.73元/天
一次搞定AI科研
立即登录
  • English
  • 联系方式
    Radiation oncology (London, England)

    Radiation oncology (London, England)

    Journal

    年发文量

    研究主题

    论文(3863)

    排序
    1Metal Artifact Reduction for 3 T MRI-only Prostate Radiotherapy in Patients with Hip Prostheses: Impact on Target Definition, Synthetic CT Generation, Dose Calculation, and Fiducial Marker Identification
    Mizgin Coskun, J. Stefan Petersson, Sacha af Wetterstedt,Patrik Brynolfsson,Christian Jamtheim Gustafsson,Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson,Lars E. Olsson,Carl Siversson

    Abstract Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft-tissue contrast and MRI-only radiotherapy (RT) eliminates uncertainties associated with computed tomography (CT)-to-MRI image registration. An MRI-only RT workflow in patients with hip prostheses remains challenging since delineation, synthetic CT (sCT) generation, and marker identification ideally rely on MR images, which are sensitive to distortions. Metal-artifact reduction sequences (MARS) mitigate metal distortions but often obscure gold markers. The aim of this study is to present a proof-of-concept 3 T MRI-only RT workflow for prostate cancer patients with hip prostheses, using only MARS MAVRIC-SL (GE HealthCare) for delineation, sCT generation and fiducial marker identification. Methods Five prostate cancer patients with one or two hip prostheses and intraprostatic fiducial markers underwent CT, standard 3 T MRI and additional MAVRIC-SL MRI. All images were used retrospectively and did not affect patient treatment. Delineation and sCT generation were performed using MAVRIC-SL. Intraprostatic markers were not visible in MAVRIC-SL due to artifact suppression; instead, raw data were reconstructed into spectral-bin images to manually identify the markers. To prevent incoming radiation from passing through the implants and reduce the associated uncertainties in dose calculation and treatment delivery, beam avoidance sectors (AS) were applied. Conventional CT-based avoidance sectors were registered to the sCT and defined as AS1. Prosthesis-induced signal voids in MAVRIC-SL were used to define AS2. Two treatment plans (42.7 Gy, 7 fractions) were created per patient using AS1 and AS2. Plans were compared using dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. AS2-plans were recalculated on registered CTs for DVH-comparison and gamma analyses (2%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm with 10% dose threshold) were performed. Results Delineation, marker identification and sCT generation were successful using MAVRIC-SL. Median dose differences between AS1 and AS2 remained within ± 0.1% for PTV, while OAR metrics ranged from − 0.4% to + 0.7%. AS2-plans recalculated on CT showed dose differences ≤ 0.9% for PTV and ≤ 1% for OARs. Median gamma pass rates were 99.1% (2%/2 mm) and 96.4% (1%/1 mm). Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of an MRI-only radiotherapy workflow at 3 T for prostate cancer patients with hip prostheses, enabling delineation, sCT generation, dose calculation and marker identification from a single MAVRIC-SL acquisition. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    2Cisplatin Enhances Radiation-Induced Apoptosis in Peripheral Lymphocytes of Cancer Patients: in Vivo and in Vitro Findings
    Ali Sak,Emil Mladenov, Yasemin Alberti,Martin Stuschke

    Abstract Background Concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy frequently cause severe acute hematologic toxicity. This study investigated whether lymphocyte apoptosis, quantified via the γ-H2AX pan-nuclear immunostaining assay, can serve as a reliable biomarker for the acute hematologic side effects of combined chemoradiation. Methods Blood samples were collected from cancer patients and healthy controls. Lymphocyte apoptosis was evaluated using the γ-H2AX pan-nuclear assay following in vitro and in vivo exposure to cisplatin and ionizing radiation (IR). In PBMCs, γ-H2AX results strongly correlated with conventional caspase-3 (r = 0.9736) and annexin V (r = 0.9780) apoptosis assays. Additionally, in vitro experiments assessed how phytohemagglutinin-L (PHA-L)-induced lymphocyte proliferation influences the combined effects of cisplatin and IR on apoptosis, alongside the regulatory role of the ATM protein. Results In vitro, cisplatin increased lymphocyte apoptosis asymptotically, plateauing at 10 µg/ml (11.6 ± 5.0%). Combined cisplatin and IR treatment increased apoptosis in a strictly additive manner (radiation effect: p < 0.0001), with no significant synergistic interaction effect between the two modalities (p = 0.22). The apoptotic effect level of in vivo cisplatin administration did not differ significantly from the maximum effect observed following a 1-hour in vitro exposure to high cisplatin concentrations. In vivo, the additive effect of cisplatin on IR-induced apoptosis peaked up to 3 days post-administration before returning to baseline by day 6. Consistent with these findings, cisplatin and radiation induced a significant, additive increase in apoptosis within PHA-L-stimulated lymphocytes. Inhibition of ATM has no effect on apoptosis following treatment with cisplatin and IR. Conclusions The γ-H2AX pan-nuclear assay provides a valid, reliable method for quantifying radiation- and chemotherapy-induced lymphocyte damage. The time-dependent, additive toxicity observed indicates a critical clinical window (up to 3 days post-cisplatin) for maximum hematologic damage, allowing for optimization of treatment schedules. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    3How Reliable is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold at CT Simulation? Clinical Impact of Surface-Guided Breathing Training in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
    Lou Dietrich, Niklas Lackner,Andre Karius, Johann Brand, Rafael Lobao, Aliheydar Huseynli,Oliver J. Ott,Stefanie Corradini, Rainer Fietkau,Christoph Bert, Maya Shariff

    Abstract Purpose Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce cardiac dose in left-sided breast radiotherapy. However, the reliability of DIBH at CT simulation, has not been systematically evaluated despite the importance of CT simulation as the basis for treatment planning. We investigated the clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training on DIBH reliability and cardiac dose sparing. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 115 breast cancer patients undergoing DIBH CT simulation were analyzed before and after implementation of surface-guided breathing training using an SGRT system. DIBH performance was quantified by partial lung volume increase (PLVI) and breath-hold variability. Correlations between external surface motion and internal DIBH depth were assessed. Cardiac dose metrics were compared, with a subgroup analysis for patients receiving lymphatic drainage area (LDA) irradiation. Results Prior to training, insufficient DIBH CTs—including negative PLVI cases—were observed. After training implementation, all CT scans were acquired in intended breath-hold states, eliminating insufficient DIBH acquisitions. Mean PLVI increased by ~ 9%, and breath-hold variability decreased by ~ 26%. Sternum motion correlated most strongly with PLVI, with multiregion surface monitoring yielding the highest internal correlation. These improvements were reflected in significant reductions in cardiac dose, particularly in the LDA subgroup, with selected heart dose metrics reduced up to 96%, while maintaining target coverage. Conclusions DIBH at CT simulation with surface-guided breathing training proves to be reliable. The training prevents planning CTs in wrong breathing states and thus enables clinically meaningful cardiac dose reduction in breast radiotherapy.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    4Clinical Evaluation Using First-Day Assessment of Patient Suitability for Successful Performance of Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
    Bahar Cepni, Vania Batista, Line Hoeltgen, Hanna Waldsperger,Lars Wessel,Jakob Liermann, Semi Harrabi,Fabian Weykamp,Nathalie Arians, Juliane Hörner-Rieber, Jürgen Debus,Eva Meixner

    Abstract Background Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a radiotherapy standard technique for cardiac-sparing in breast cancer, particularly for left-sided tumors. However, not all patients can successfully complete DIBH RT in clinical routine, necessitating conversion to free breathing (FB) techniques and replanning. This study aimed to identify clinical factors predictive of DIBH feasibility to optimize patient selection and resource utilization. Methods This retrospective study analyzed all patients ( n = 1920) who underwent curative postoperative breast cancer radiotherapy at our institution between May 2020 and December 2024. All patients underwent initial DIBH feasibility assessment and were evaluated for completion of radiotherapy with DIBH or conversion to FB technique. A detailed subanalysis was performed for all patients treated in 2023 ( n = 470). Patient-related factors including age, body mass index (BMI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), pulmonary comorbidities, smoking status, and geometric surface distance between DIBH and FB planning scans were collected for the subanalysis. Results Across the entire cohort (years 2020–2024) of 1,920 patients, 78 replannings (4%) occurred due to conversion from DIBH to free breathing. Increasing age (cut-off of 63 years) was significantly associated with higher replanning rates ( p = 0.001). In the 2023 subanalysis ( n = 470), pulmonary comorbidities ( p = 0.008), higher CCI ( p = 0.044), and a geometric surface distance of below 1 cm between DIBH and FB CT scans ( p = 0.0001) were significant predictors of replanning. The Karnofsky Performance Score, BMI, and smoking status showed no significant association with replanning. Conclusions Age, pulmonary comorbidities, overall comorbidity burden, and insufficient geometric displacement are significant predictors of DIBH failure in breast cancer radiotherapy. These readily available clinical parameters can optimize patient selection algorithms and inform decisions regarding dual CT simulation workflows. A risk-stratified approach incorporating these factors may reduce unnecessary imaging, decrease planning burden, and improve resource allocation while maintaining optimal cardiac protection for appropriate candidates. Clinical trial number The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS; registration number: DRKS00038550) on 22 December 2025 ( https://www.drks.de/ ).

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    5FLASH Radiotherapy: Physico-Chemical Considerations on Ionisation Tracks, Radical Reactions, and the Role of Oxygen.
    Carsten Herskind, Peter O’Neill, Michael R. Horsman

    The sparing effect of FLASH irradiation with ultrahigh dose rates (UHDR), by applying high dose fractions in less than one second, on adverse reaction in many normal tissues but not on tumour control has the potential to widen the therapeutic window and advance cancer radiotherapy. However, the mechanism is poorly understood, preventing its optimal application in the clinic. Here we review the current knowledge of radiation-induced radicals and their reactions, including time factors which are rarely considered. Furthermore, experimental in vitro and in vivo data in the framework of prevailing hypotheses, and the role of low oxygen concentrations and reoxygenation, are discussed. Finally, potential protective mechanisms are considered based on such reactions and the role of oxygen. We argue that more than one mechanism may contribute to dose-rate dependent protection, and that differences exist between protective mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we propose a new protective reaction linking radiation chemistry to the role of oxygen in FLASH irradiation and incorporating the differential responses of normal tissue and tumours.

    2026
    引用
    AI阅读
    加入学术空间
    立即登录,查看全部 3863 篇论文

    高被引作者

    作者引用发文
    Claus Belka5560119
    Jürgen Debus5176136
    Luca Cozzi292945
    Antonella Fogliata276242
    Stephanie E. Combs264569
    Matthias Guckenberger241351
    Stefanie Corradini197853
    Maximilian Niyazi195855
    Giuseppe Minniti169517
    Alessandro Clivio164920

    高产作者

    作者引用发文
    Jürgen Debus5176136
    Claus Belka5560119
    Stephanie E. Combs264569
    Maximilian Niyazi195855
    Stefanie Corradini197853
    Matthias Guckenberger241351
    Luca Cozzi292945
    Antonella Fogliata276242
    Ute Ganswindt143434
    Frederik Wenz141832

    相关期刊

    Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists
    Cancer/Radiothérapie
    Practical radiation oncology
    Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT
    International journal of particle therapy
    Clinical and translational radiation oncology
    Precision radiation oncology
    Radiation Oncology Journal
    Cancer Radiotherapie
    Precision Radiation Oncology