Based on the results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) assessing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), DOACs have been proposed as alternative to low molecular weight heparin by several international guidelines. However, the proportion of CAT patients who would have not been eligible for such trials is currently unknown. Our primary aim was to assess the proportion of patients seen in clinical practice for acute CAT who would not have been eligible for CARAVAGGIO or HOKUSAI-VTE RCT. Secondary aim was to describe patients outcomes according to eligibility. In a multicenter, observational study, all patients consecutively admitted from January 2017 to December 2019 for an acute CAT event were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of non-inclusion criteria for CARAVAGGIO or HOKUSAI-VTE RCT. Event free survival during a 6-month follow-up were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Among the 302 patients (women: 53 %, mean age: 67.9 ± 13.2) analyzed, 138 (46 %) for HOKUSAI-VTE cancer and 161 (53 %) for CARAVAGGIO met one or more non-inclusion criteria. Main criteria were upper limb and unsual site thrombosis (n = 63, 18.5 %), anemia/thrombopenia (n = 43, 14.2 %), brain tumors (n = 33, 10.9 %), ECOG PS >2 (n = 28, 9.3 %), severe renal failure (n = 16, 5.3 %). At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was not statistically different between the two groups. Almost half of CAT patients would have not been able to participate to a modern DOAC RCT. Evaluation of DOACs safety and efficacy in this subset of patients deserves further research.
Background: Endothelial dysfunction is a key-feature in acute COVID-19. However, follow-up data regarding endothelial dysfunction and injury after COVID-19 infection are lacking. We aimed to investigate the changes in endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation at baseline and four months after hospital discharge in COVID-19 patients. Methods: Twenty COVID-19 patients were compared to 24 healthy controls. Clinical and morphological data were collected after hospital admission for SARS-CoV-2 infection and reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) measurement was performed with a delay between 24 and 48 h after hospital admission and four months after hospital discharge in the outpatient clinics. Blood tests including inflammatory markers and measurement of post-occlusive vasorelaxation by digital peripheral arterial tonometry were performed at both visits. Results: At baseline, COVID-19 patients exhibited reduced RHI compared to controls (p < 0.001), in line with an endothelial dysfunction. At four months follow-up, there was a 51% increase in the RHI (1.69 +/- 0.32 to 2.51 +/- 0.91; p < 0.01) in favor of endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation recovery. RHI changes were positively correlated with baseline C-reactive protein (r = 0.68; p = 0.02). Compared to COVID-19 patients with a decrease in RHI, COVID-19 patients with an increase in RHI beyond the day-to-day variability (i.e. >11%) had less severe systemic inflammation at baseline. Conclusion: Convalescent COVID-19 patients showed a recovery of systemic artery endothelial dysfunction, in particular patients with lower inflammation at baseline. Further studies are needed to decipher the interplay between inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 patients.
We herein report a case of putative everolimus-associated chylothorax in a cardiac transplant recipient. A 17-year-old Japanese boy with dilated cardiomyopathy and severe cardiac failure requiring left ventricular assist support was determined to be a cardiac transplant candidate in 1992. He underwent overseas heart transplantation in Houston, Texas in October 1992. He was subsequently treated with immunosuppression therapy: Cyclosporine (CSA), azathioprine, and prednisolone (PRD). After several acute rejection episodes requiring steroid therapy, intravascular ultrasonography revealed a moderate degree of transplant coronary arterial vasculopathy (TCAV) with 50% stenosis in 2003. He underwent coronary stenting twice; the immunosuppressive regimen was converted to CSA, mycophenolate mofetil, everolimus (EVL), and PRD in 2006. TCAV has not progressed since then. In October 2008, chest x-ray showed bilateral pleural effusion. As we thought that the pleural effusion was caused by cardiac dysfunction due to moderate mitral regurgitation and TCAV as well as renal impairment, he was treated with diuretics and digoxin. However, the pleural effusion progressed gradually associated with exertional dyspnea and moderate edema of his lower legs. Chest computed tomography showed massive bilateral pleural effusions without evidence of malignancy in 2011. A pleural tap in 2011 revealed chylothorax. Although mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors were major drugs for lymphoangioleimyomatosis, we believed that the chylothorax was associated with EVL. EVL was discontinued in March 2011: the chylothorax spontaneously resolved in November 2011.
Background: GAP (gender-age-physiology) and TORVAN are multi-parametric prognostication scores for idio- pathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We compared their prognostic value in patients treated with nintedanib or pirfenidone and explored their effect on patient survival in relation to disease staging. Study design and patients: Retrospective evaluation of 235 naive IPF patients (M=179; mean age 69.8 yrs +/- 7.1; 102 treated with nintedanib and 133 with pirfenidone), referred to two Italian academic centers between February 2012 and December 2019. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, the incidence rate of death was 14.5 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 12 to 17.4), with no differences between nintedanib and pirfenidone (log-rank p=0.771). According to time-ROC analysis, GAP and TORVAN showed a similar discrimination performance at 1, 2, and 5 years. Survival of GAP-2/GAP-3 IPF patients treated with nintedanib was worse than that of patients in GAP-1 (HR 4.8, 95% CI: 2.2 to 10.5 and HR 9.4, 95% CI: 3.8 to 23.2). TORVAN I patients treated with nintedanib exhibited better survival than those in stages III (HR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.4 to 6.6) and IV (HR 10.5, 95% CI: 3.5 to 31.6). A significant treatment x stage interaction was observed for both disease staging indexes (p=0.042 for treatment by GAP interaction and p=0.046 for treatment by TORVAN interaction). A better survival was associated with nintedanib in patients with mild disease (GAP-1 or TORVAN I stage) and with pirfenidone in GAP-3 or TOR-VAN IV cases, although these findings did not always reach statistical significance. Conclusions: GAP and TORVAN similarly perform in IPF patients on anti-fibrotic therapy. However, the survival of patients treated with nintedanib and pirfenidone appears to be differently affected by disease staging. (c) 2023 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
