Analysis of Various Modalities for Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Relation to Keratoconus Severity in 246 Eyes of the Homburg Keratoconus Center

Purpose:Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement may be difficult in keratoconus (KC) due to corneal protrusion and irregular astigmatism. This study aimed to assess which IOP measurement modality is least affected by KC severity.Methods:Data from 246 corneas of 246 patients with KC were retrospectively analyzed. KC stages were determined using the Topographic KC (TKC) and ABCD KC classifications derived from Pentacam (Oculus, Germany). IOP was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert Instruments, USA), and Corvis ST (CST, Oculus, Germany). Cronbach alpha (CA), analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction, Dunnett T3, and Pearson correlation were performed.Results:Using CA, the reliability of measurements using various modalities increased to 0.764 to 0.943 when excluding IOP Goldmann overall and in each KC stage (TKC and ABCD). Analysis of variance revealed significant differences between TKC and ABCD stages for almost all IOP modalities. The Bonferroni post hoc test showed significant differences between the measured IOP in earlier and advanced KC stages, except for the biomechanically CST-corrected IOP (bIOP). Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between IOP and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) for all IOP modalities except bIOP.Conclusions:CST-based bIOP seems to be best suited for IOP measurement in KC because it did not correlate with TCT in contrast to IOP measurements by ORA or GAT. The measurement results from GAT in patients with KC should be interpreted with care and always in view of corneal thickness. As a thumb rule, we suggest to add at least 2 mm Hg to the measured GAT value.