Aperiodic Dynamics of Cell Assemblies Recruited for L1 and L2 Processing of French Wh-Dependencies Highlight a Temporo-Parietal Engagement in Syntax. | AMiner
Aperiodic Dynamics of Cell Assemblies Recruited for L1 and L2 Processing of French Wh-Dependencies Highlight a Temporo-Parietal Engagement in Syntax.
Background/Objectives: A current debate addresses where syntactic Merge primarily resides: the left-hemisphere posterior inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) or the temporo-parietal cortex. For proponents of the former, the temporo-parietal cortex supports more effortful processing; for the latter, the IFG supports integration and conflict resolution. We examine aperiodic activity in processing wh-filler-gap dependencies in French for evidence from network dynamics addressing engagement in syntax across L1 and L2. Methods: We extracted aperiodic activity 1/f components (considering offsets as a reflection of neuronal spiking and exponents as a reflection of excitatory-inhibitory balance) out of power spectrum density at 0.5-40 Hz across occipital and bilateral frontal and temporo-parietal regions of interest (ROIs) in reading. Results: Greater exponents arose in temporo-parietal than frontal ROIs in L1 and L2, with strong spiking and regulation suggested by greater offsets and exponents in the occipital ROI in L2-unlike L1-and with potential modulation by L1-L2 representation overlaps. These patterns suggest distributed cell assemblies for L1 and L2 processing. Increased regulation in temporo-parietal ROIs across L1 and L2 cell assemblies might suggest a structural function across temporo-parietal cortices in syntactic processing. Conclusions: Aperiodic activity reflecting connectivity in L1 and L2 processing supports distinct L1 and L2 cell assemblies, with L2 patterns suggesting potential overlap between L1 and L2 circuit modules. Greater exponents in bilateral temporo-parietal ROIs across L1 and L2 indicate increased regulation, supporting the engagement of lateralized temporo-parietal cortices in computations. These effects are discussed by considering advances in syntactic theory and the biology of language readiness.