Comparing Causal Estimands from Sequential Nested Versus Single Point Target Trials: A Simulation Study

Sequential nested trial (SNT) emulation is a powerful approach for maximizing precision and avoiding time-related biases. However, there exists little discussion about the implied causal estimands in comparison to a real-world single point trial. We used Monte Carlo simulation to compare treatment effect estimates from an SNT emulation that re-indexed patients annually and a SNT emulation with a treatment decision design to the estimates from a single point trial. We generated 5,000 cohorts of 5,000 people with 3 years of follow-up. For the single point trial, patients were randomized to initiate or not initiate treatment at Visit 1. For the SNT emulations, simulated patients could contribute up to two index dates. When disease severity did not modify the treatment effect, both SNT approaches returned treatment effect estimates identical to the single point trial. In the presence of treatment effect modification by disease severity, both SNT approaches returned treatment effect estimates that diverged from the single point trial even after confounding-adjustment. These findings underscore the difficulties of interpreting causal estimands from a SNT emulation: the target population does not correspond to a single time point trial. Such implications are important for communicating study results for evidence-based decision-making.