Drivers frequently encounter Type II dilemma zones at signalized intersections, where the decision to stop or proceed during the onset of a yellow indication can be ambiguous. Decision-making relies on drivers' expectations of the yellow change interval duration and behavioral factors. While boundaries of these zones are well studied, less is known about how familiar drivers are with their local yellow indication laws, which vary from state to state, and whether their typical reactions to yellow indications align with the laws. Existing interventions like signal timing adjustments, improved vehicle detection, and advance warning signs reduce the number of drivers caught in dilemma zones but may not reach distracted drivers. In-vehicle alerts tailored to dilemma zone scenarios are a potential solution not yet implemented widely in North America. This study addresses how drivers may interpret these alerts. A web-based survey of 640 licensed drivers in Michigan and Washington (ages 18-85) assessed respondents' knowledge of their state's law, typical responses to yellow indications, interpretations of proposed in-vehicle alerts, and preferences for alert modality, frequency, and placement. These states were selected for their differing yellow indication laws-restrictive in Michigan, permissive in Washington. Nine alert visuals were tested, including pairs of implicit and explicit messages, and were inspired by or designed to address gaps in prior research. Respondents evaluated these alerts in response to hypothetical intersection scenarios that varied by the presence of other vehicles. Results revealed a prevalent misunderstanding of local yellow indication laws across both states. Statistical analyses showed significant differences in rankings among the nine alert visuals, and explicit messages showed higher rates of correct interpretation. Findings show overall driver support for dilemma zone alerts, but higher receptivity in drivers who more frequently use other ADAS features and lower receptivity in drivers within older, but not the oldest, age groups. Future research could explore whether these alerts promote safe behaviors aimed at crash avoidance.
原文链接
分享
引用
