Existing frameworks explain intelligence failure as a breakdown of collection, cognitive bias or organizational dysfunction. However, they do not explain why valid intelligence is dismissed as 'irrational' or 'implausible' when facing culturally asymmetric adversaries. Recovering Robert B. Bathurst's neglected work, this article maps the structural dissonance between 'low-context' Western and 'high-context' strategic logic, analysing Pearl Harbor, Yom Kippur, 9/11, and October 7th, to demonstrate how adversaries have exploited predictable blind spots rooted in divergent assumptions about rationality, risk, and violence. The article introduces the Asymmetric Logic Framework as a diagnostic tool to reduce predictable incomprehension before the next surprise.