Islands of Fractionation for Automated Fractionation Mapping in Epicardial Brugada Syndrome Substrate Ablation

INTRODUCTION:Brugada syndrome epicardial RVOT ablation reduces VF, but procedural endpoints remain debated. Automated fractionation maps are often interpreted as scattered points, which may reflect artifacts. OBJECTIVES:We propose Islands of Fractionation (IOF), a framework comparing EnSite X fractionation count settings against voltage-defined lesion-effect reference region. METHODS:This case series included six Brugada syndrome patients undergoing epicardial substrate ablation. Mapping was performed in sinus rhythm using EnSite X with an Advisor HD Grid catheter. Automated fractionation maps were generated with the EnSite X CFE-count algorithm using refractory settings of 14 and 20 ms. Abnormal points were defined as fractionation count ≥3; lesion-effect reference region was defined by voltage change (pre >0.5 mV, post <0.3 mV). Island overlap was quantified using DBSCAN clustering and mesh-based area estimation. RESULTS:IOF revealed a consistent coverage-parsimony trade-off between refractory settings. The 14-ms setting produced broader islands with higher reference-region coverage (median overlap 84.6% [IQR 80.8-93.7]) but larger extraneous mapped area (up to 72.9 cm2). The 20-ms setting produced more compact islands with markedly reduced extraneous area (0.0-34.8 cm2) but lower coverage (59.9% [IQR 37.2-74.7]). In parallel, fractionation burden within the ablated region decreased substantially after ablation in both settings (median total burden reduction 86% vs 93%), supporting lesion-effect concordance of automated fractionation metrics. CONCLUSION:IOF provides an island-based framework for interpreting automated fractionation mapping and describing its spatial concordance with lesion-effect regions. In this retrospective series, 14 ms favored broader coverage, whereas 20 ms favored greater parsimony.