Kids Write and Create

You have accessThe ASHA LeaderFeature1 Feb 2010Kids Write and CreateA Service Learning Project in North Philadelphia Rena Krakow, PhD Megan Dunn Davison andPhD, CCC-SLP Brian GoldsteinPhD, CCC-SLP Rena Krakow Google Scholar More articles by this author , PhD, Megan Dunn Davison Google Scholar More articles by this author , PhD, CCC-SLP and Brian Goldstein Google Scholar More articles by this author , PhD, CCC-SLP https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR3.15022010.18 SectionsAbout ToolsAdd to favorites ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Located a mile apart from each other in North Philadelphia, Temple University and the Frederick Douglass Elementary School seem worlds apart. Temple is a public research university with one of the most diverse student bodies in the country; Douglass, a local public school, is almost uniformly a school of children from minority backgrounds, 89% of whom qualify for reduced or free lunch. Moreover, literacy achievement at Douglass is woefully inadequate; fewer than 10% of its fifth-grade students achieved a score of “proficient” or better on the state reading assessment in the 2007–2008 school year (Pennsylvania Department of Education, 2009). Research on inner-city adolescents and adults reveals correlations between reading failure and dropping out of school, un- and underemployment, and poor health outcomes (Craig, Connor, & Washington, 2003; Rudd, Colton, & Schacht, 2000). Although it is imperative to focus on the later school years and beyond, it also is critical to recognize that children living in poverty typically start school at a significant disadvantage in terms of their emergent literacy development (Foster & Miller, 2007). One approach to overcoming these challenges is to provide one-on-one mentoring/tutoring. Consider- able evidence attests to the value of such programs on children’s literacy development, self-esteem, and motivation to stay in school (Moore-Hart & Karabenick, 2009; Weinberger, 2007). One-on-one mentoring/tutoring of inner-city children is most likely to be effective when the mentor/tutors are professionals in the area of literacy (e.g., teachers), but there are not enough teachers available to meet the overwhelming need. Hence, many programs recruit volunteers, providing them with varying amounts of training and supervision, resulting in varying degrees of effectiveness (Wasik & Slavin, 1993). Service Learning A unique way of addressing the need for skilled tutor/mentors, especially in communities that have both universities with speech-language pathology programs and public schools serving children who live in poverty, is to make service learning part of the curriculum for the speech-language pathology students. Indeed, literacy and serving a diverse client base are included in the scope of practice for SLPs (ASHA, 2007). The “Kids Write and Create Program,” developed in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at Temple University, provides young students at the Douglass School with literacy mentors. Every second-year master’s student participates for two consecutive semesters in this project, which is integrated into a two-course sequence: “Written Language Development and Disorders” (fall) and “Assessment and Treatment of Diverse Populations” (spring). Temple students are paired one-on-one with kindergarten or first-grade students who attend an after-school program at Douglass. Pairings remain the same throughout the year unless a child leaves the school or after-school program. Mentorship through service offers benefits for both the mentor and the mentored (Eyler & Giles, J., 1999). Temple mentors repeatedly express their feelings of enhanced learning about education and literacy development in an inner-city public school through participation in this program. The experience also fills a gap in the programs of some speech-language pathology students, whose school practicum may lack a literacy component. “Kids Write and Create” targets the youngest students because of evidence that children who do not read at grade level by the end of first grade are unlikely to ever catch up (e.g., Torgeson, 1998). The program is designed to be highly motivating to children of this age. Research shows that children who are engaged in pleasurable literacy activities are more likely to persevere when learning tasks become more challenging and thus are more likely to be successful at reading (Paris & Oka, 1986; Schunk, 1985). We build on notions at the core of “kid writing” programs: that young children recognize differences between spoken and written language (Sulzby, 1996) and have the desire and ability to communicate through writing, well before they have mastered the mapping of orthography to speech and the mechanics of handwriting (Feldgus & Cardonick, 1999). Such programs demonstrate that it is possible and desirable to use “writing as a gateway to literacy” (Kucer & Harste, 1991). Individual Attention Our program differs from most children’s writing programs, however, in the use of mentors who work one-on-one with children (as opposed to a teacher circulating around the room) and who have the knowledge and skills to scaffold the children’s developing writing and reading (as opposed to volunteers). “Kids Write and Create” also provides continuity with buddy pairs matched and working consistently for the entire school year. Mentors help their buddies plan, compose, revise, finish, and read their own books at levels best suited to each child. The children write personal narratives in the fall term and expository works in the spring. In spring 2009, the topic for the expository texts was famous African Americans; children chose, among others, Barack Obama, Frederick Douglass, Beyonce, Rosa Parks, Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, and Martin Luther King, Jr. Although in many writing programs children write as best they can, our program allows children to dictate their sentences. SLP mentors take dictation but also scaffold the children’s oral language to facilitate growth in written language skills. Mentors type the text and scan into digital files the accompanying illustrations that the children make. In addition, each book has a cover, title page, and an “about the author” page with a photograph. At the end of each semester, books are bound and presented to the authors, who are recognized at a special celebration held in their honor attended by parents/guardians, teachers, and the Temple mentors. Many children are amazed that their own ideas and words are worthy of being “published.” For some, it is the first book they have ever owned. Outcomes “Kids Write and Create” has operated at the Douglass School since fall 2007. In 2008–2009, we began to assess program effectiveness using the Test of Early Reading Ability (TERA-3; Reid, Hresko, & Hammill, 2001) along with questionnaires administered to the children and their mentors about their experiences with the program. Pre- and post-test data (reading quotients) from the TERA on the 30 children assessed in 2008–2009 showed a significant increase in literacy achievement over the academic year [t (1, 30)=-2.13, p=.04, d=.29]. Moreover, at pre-test, 53% of participants were performing significantly below the mean on the TERA (i.e., > 1 s.d. below the mean) compared to 30% at post-test. It is important to note that the population at Douglass is highly mobile and many children do not complete a full academic year at the same school or even in the same neighborhood, making it impossible to post-test some children for our analyses. Nonetheless, the decision was made to include even those Douglass children who live in the local homeless shelter; recognizing that they were most unlikely to attend the entire year, we placed the service part of service learning ahead of the desire to obtain the most robust statistical outcome. We will add to the number of students pre- and post-tested as we continue the program. According to the National Commission on Service Learning (see Fiske, 2001), service learning is a teaching and learning approach that integrates community service with academic study to enrich learning, teach civic responsibility, and strengthen communities (p.3). We believe that this definition aptly characterizes what “Kids Write and Create” is doing and we believe that SLPs in training have much to offer and much to gain through their participation. Mentors, Children Respond Positively to Temple Literacy Project When asked what they learned from participating in the “Kids Write and Create” program, the children responded with the following comments: “It felt good because I know how to write a book.” “To be a better writer.” “It is important to read.” “I learned that I can sound out the words if I want to read to someone.” “I learned about putting periods and question marks at the end of the sentences.” “I learned to read it by myself.” “I learned about how to put my sentences in order in my story.” “It is fun that you can write something that you want.” Temple mentors also valued the experience, providing some measure of ecological validity: “I think my students gained ownership over their knowledge and words. When I brought in the first draft of their book, and they started reading their own words, their eyes lit up.” “[Student] was very excited to see his book by the end of the program. I think he was almost in disbelief that it was his creation. This may be presumptuous, but I don’t think he previously experienced creating and owning something. An adult hadn’t previously said, ‘what we make is yours, I’m a helper, but you are the boss.’ Maybe that sounds lame. The kids all loved the one-on-one time with adults.” “[Student] seemed to gain confidence and pride in creating his story. He really put a lot of effort into it.” “I think that this experience showed the children that there are people from the community who care about them and are willing to help them in any way possible.” “Keep doing the project! The experience really meant a lot to [student] and I’m so glad that I could share it with him.” “I think [student] was extremely proud of what he accomplished.” “[Student] gained the experience of learning how to use his imagination to create a storybook. He learned the different components of a story. He also gained ownership of creating and receiving the finished book.” “I liked seeing [student] get so excited about my presence—he couldn’t wait to get started.” References American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2007). Scope of Practice in Speech-Language Pathology [Scope of Practice]. Available from www.asha.org/policy. Google Scholar Craig H., Connor C., & Washington J. (2003). Early positive predictors of later reading comprehension for African American students: a preliminary investigation.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 34, 31–43. Google Scholar Eyler J., & D.E. Giles J. (1999). Where’s the Learning in Service-Learning?San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar Feldgus E. & Cardonick I. (1999) Kid writing: A systematic approach to phonics, journals, and writing workshops (3rd ed.). Write Group/Mcgraw-Hill. Google Scholar Fiske E.B. (2001). Learning in Deed. The Power of Service-Learning for American Schools. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Google Scholar Foster W. & Miller M. (2007). Development of the literacy achievement gap: A longitudinal study of kindergarten through third grade.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 173–181. LinkGoogle Scholar Kucer S.B. & Harste J. (1991). The reading and writing connection: Counterpart strategy instruction.In Hayes B. (Ed.), Effective strategies for teaching reading. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar Moore-Hart M. & Karabenick S. (2009). Becoming successful readers: A volunteer tutoring program for culturally diverse students.Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 149–171. Google Scholar Nolen S. (2007). Young children’s motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts.Cognition and Instruction, 25, 219–270. Google Scholar Author Notes Rena Krakow, PhD, is an associate professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at Temple University.She has degrees in linguistics and special education. contact her a [email protected]. Megan Dunn Davison, PhD, CCC-SLP, is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at Temple University. Her research interests include language and literacy development in at-risk populations. Brian Goldstein, PhD, CCC-SLP, is associate professor and chair in the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders at Temple University. Advertising Disclaimer | Advertise With Us Advertising Disclaimer | Advertise With Us Additional Resources FiguresSourcesRelatedDetails Volume 15Issue 2February 2010 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in print: Feb 1, 2010 Metrics Downloaded 285 times Topicsasha-topicsleader_do_tagleader-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & Permissions© 2010 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...