P8. CAN A TRIANGULAR SKIN FLAP DECREASE T- JUNCTION DEHISCENCE IN BREAST REDUCTION?

PURPOSE: In 2001, Elkwood and Matarasso conducted an American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) member survey detailing browlift practice patterns. Despite significant changes in approach in the past twenty years, no survey has been performed since. METHODS: A 34-question descriptive survey was electronically distributed to a random group of 2,360 ASPS members. Results were then compared to the 2001 survey. RESULTS: A total of 257 responses were collected (11% response rate; ±6% margin of error at 95% CI). The most frequent technique for the correction of brow ptosis in both surveys was the endoscopic approach. The use of hardware fixation has increased in endoscopic browlifting while the use of cortical tunnels has decreased. While coronal browlifting has decreased in frequency, hairline and isolated temporal lift have increased. Neuromodulators have replaced resurfacing techniques as the most common non-surgical adjunct. Frequent use of neuromodulators has risen from 11.2% to 88.5%. Nearly 30% of current surgeons feel that neuromodulators have replaced formal browlifting procedures to a significant degree. CONCLUSION: In comparing the 2001 and current ASPS member survey there has been a clear transition to less invasive procedures over time. While the endoscopic approach was the most popular means of forehead correction in both surveys, coronal brow lifting has decreased in frequency while the hairline and temporal approaches have increased. Neurotoxins have replaced laser resurfacing and chemical peeling methods as an adjunct, and in some cases replaced the invasive procedure entirely. Possible explanations for the above will be discussed.