Performance of Human and Computer-aided Evaluation of Digital Chest Radiography for Community-based Screening of Asymptomatic Tuberculosis.

Background:The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends digital chest radiography (dCXR) with computer-aided detection (CAD) for tuberculosis (TB) screening of individuals >15 years of age. Methodology:Adults (≥18 years) were enrolled (March 2021-December 2022) in South Africa into a community-based Screening Cohort (household contacts) and a facility-based Triage Cohort (symptomatic clinic attendees). Microbiologically-confirmed pulmonary TB required positive sputum culture and/or Xpert Ultra. Asymptomatic TB was diagnosed in participants without TB symptoms. dCXR were read by blinded human readers and qXR CAD (0.5 threshold; Qure.AI, India). Results:dCXR from 1,353 participants (886 Screening Cohort; 467 Triage Cohort) were analysed. Microbiologically-confirmed TB occurred in 48 (5.4%) Screening Cohort [9 symptomatic (19%) and 39 asymptomatic (81%)]; and 116 (24.8%) Triage Cohort (all symptomatic) participants. dCXR sensitivity (human readers) for asymptomatic TB in the Screening Cohort was 56.4%, vs. 72.4% for symptomatic TB in the Triage Cohort (difference -16%; 95%CI -2.9 to -29.1); with specificities 94.1% and 81.2%, respectively. Corresponding qXR CAD sensitivities were 69.2% vs. 83.6% (difference -14.4%; 95%CI -26 to -2.8), with specificities 89.3% and 73.5%, respectively. The difference in dCXR sensitivity and specificity for asymptomatic TB between qXR CAD and human readers was 12.8% (95%CI -0.48 to 26.1) and -4.8% (95%CI -12.4 to 28.2), respectively. Conclusion:Sensitivity of community-based dCXR screening for microbiologically-confirmed asymptomatic TB among household contacts was lower than for facility-based triage of symptomatic TB, but approached 70% with CAD. Neither human reader nor qXR CAD evaluation met WHO targets for a TB screening test (90% sensitivity; 80% specificity).