THU005 Patient and Public Involvement in Virtual Simulation-based Education Informs and Enhances Clinicians’ Knowledge in Managing Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Adrenal Conditions

Abstract Disclosure: C.S. Pan: None. E. Melson: None. T. Ogiliev: None. D. Zhou: None. S.Y. Ng: None. F. Rezai: None. Z. Olateju: None. E. Radcliffe: None. P. Balendran: None. A. Radcliffe: None. G.M. Lau: None. J. Sheikh: None. H. Kaur: None. C. Cooper: None. F. Abdelhameed: None. F. Pang: None. S. Bhatt: None. D. Shabbir: None. M. Davitadze: None. A. Prete: None. C.L. Ronchi: None. I. Bancos: None. V. Chortis: None. J.D. Newell-Price: None. H.L. Simpson: None. H. Gleeson: None. K. Manolopoulos: None. J. Chu: None. M.W. O'Reilly: None. W. Arlt: None. C. Gillett: None. P. Kempegowda: None. O. SIMBA team: None. Introduction: Simulation via Instant Messaging - Birmingham Advance (SIMBA) is an effective educational platform in increasing clinicians’ confidence in managing various endocrine conditions (Melson, 2020). However, it has lacked input from the patients living with these conditions. We hypothesize that engaging patients and members of the public can inform clinicians to better tailor management to suit the concerns and expectations of patients. Methods: Two virtual simulation sessions covering topics related to Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PPI-PCOS) and Adrenal conditions (PPI-Adrenal) were organized for clinicians. Nine cases were simulated using anonymized real-life patient data. Members of the general public living with PCOS or Adrenal conditions were recruited from several support groups to undergo a workshop-style discussion to provide their opinions on how representative the cases were and how the management of the condition could be improved. At the end of the simulations, all clinicians and patients were invited to a panel discussion led by expert consultants over Zoom incorporating the summaries from the workshops. Pre- and post-simulation surveys were distributed to measure the change in clinicians’ confidence using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Thematic analysis was used to identify gaps in knowledge and expectations between clinicians and patients with PCOS or Adrenal conditions. Results: Self-reported confidence by clinicians in the management of PCOS (n=25) and Adrenal conditions (n=23) increased post-simulation (PPI-PCOS simulated:+41.0%, p<0.001; non-simulated:+40.0%, p<0.001. PPI-Adrenal simulated:+22.5% (p=0.0001); non-simulated:+24.0% (p=0.0005)). 90% and 100% of patients agreed PPI-PCOS benefits patients to understand their condition better, and helps clinicians and patients understand each other’s perspectives respectively, whereas this is true for 80% of patients from PPI-Adrenal regarding both aspects. Recurring themes identified through thematic analysis included approach to handling complexities resulting in delayed diagnosis or management, the need for personalized care, lack of information provided to patients with regards to the progression of symptoms, complications or treatment received. Conclusion: PPI-PCOS and PPI-Adrenal were effective in increasing the knowledge and understanding of PCOS and Adrenal conditions for both members of the general public and healthcare professionals. They also helped narrow the gap in knowledge and expectations by exchanging perspectives through a common dialogue. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023