Vinorelbine and Gemcitabine Vs Vinorelbine and Carboplatin As First-Line Treatment of Advanced Nsclc. A Phase Iii Randomised Controlled Trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group | AMiner
Vinorelbine and Gemcitabine Vs Vinorelbine and Carboplatin As First-Line Treatment of Advanced Nsclc. A Phase Iii Randomised Controlled Trial by the Norwegian Lung Cancer Study Group
Background: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but earlier studies have suggested that non-platinum combinations are equally effective and better tolerated. We conducted a national, randomised study to compare a non-platinum with a platinum combination. Methods: Eligible patients had stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and performance status (PS) 0–2. Patients received up to three cycles of vinorelbine 60 mg m −2 p.o.+gemcitabine 1000 mg m −2 i.v. day 1 and 8 (VG) or vinorelbine 60 mg m −2 p.o. day 1 and 8+carboplatin area under the curve=5 (Calvert's formula) i.v. day 1 (VC). Patients ⩾75 years received 75% of the dose. Endpoints were overall survival, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), toxicity, and the use of radiotherapy. Results: We randomised 444 patients from September 2007 to April 2009. The median age was 65 years, 58% were men and 25% had PS 2. Median survival was VG: 6.3 months; VC: 7.0 months, P =0.802. Vinorelbine plus carboplatin patients had more grade III/IV nausea/vomiting (VG: 4%, VC: 12%, P =0.008) and grade IV neutropenia (VG: 7%, VC: 19%, P <0.001). Infections, HRQoL and the use of radiotherapy did not differ significantly between the treatment groups. Conclusion: The two regimens yielded similar overall survival. The VG combination had only a slightly better toxicity profile.