Chromogenic assay discrepancies were reported at General European Official Medicines Control Laboratories Network (GEON) meetings by laboratories testing FVIII-products. The objectives of the present investigation were to carry out a controlled collaborative study to examine these reports and to delineate the reasons for these discrepancies by assessing affected and unaffected FVIII products. The laboratories followed a strict study protocol, which included assessing their own individual observed factor X (FX) activation times, i.e. the time to reach 50% of maximal FX activation (T1/2), for each chromogenic kit. This measurement was used, in parallel with the kit manufacturers' prescribed FX activation times, to assess the performance of the chromogenic potency assays on FVIII test products. This study confirmed a significant discrepancy between Coatest® and Coamatic® kits and between Siemens and Coamatic® kits when the kit manufacturers' prescribed T1/2 incubation times were followed. Coamatic® kits tended to produce higher potencies than the Coatest® or Siemens kits. Furthermore, FX activation assays revealed marked differences between individual laboratories for all three chromogenic kits in the observed T1/2 incubation times, which also did not correspond to the prescribed T1/2 incubation times. The resulting differences in potency between kits, in some cases, were significantly reduced when using the actual observed T1/2 incubation times instead of the prescribed T1/2 incubation times. The study showed that FVIII potency discrepancies can occur between chromogenic kits. To compensate for this, laboratories should ideally perform FX activation curves for each new chromogenic kit in order to determine the correct observed T1/2 incubation times, which can then be used to determine FVIII potencies in therapeutic concentrates.

For acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines, the current European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph Pertussis vaccine (acellular, component, adsorbed) (1356) requires an immunogenicity assay in mice or guinea pigs to assess the potency of each lot of vaccine (Ph. Eur. general method 2.7.16. Assay of pertussis vaccine (acellular)). This biological assay, carried out on the final bulk of the vaccine lot, is based on the measurement of the specific antibody response to the 5 antigenic components (pertussis toxin (PT), Fimbrial haemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN) and Fimbriae 2 and 3 (FIM2/3)) that are present in the combined aP vaccines. In the mouse assay, serum antibody levels are measured by ELISA. The immunogenicity of a vaccine under test is estimated versus a homologous reference vaccine and a reference antiserum e.g. the first Ph. Eur. Biological Reference Preparation for Bordetella (B.) pertussis mouse anti-serum (BRP1), established in 1998, is used to normalise the titre of antibodies (expressed in ELISA Units (ELU)/mL). In anticipation of the depletion of BRP1 stocks, a project was launched in 2013 by the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) in order to establish a new standardised reference serum. The project, referred to herein as BSP129, was conducted in 2 phases: 1) the production and characterisation of a mouse serum pool (using a multicomponent aP vaccine marketed in Canada similar to the vaccine used in the BRP1 production as immunogen) and of candidate BRP batches (cBRPs) and 2) an international collaborative study aimed at calibrating the cBRPs in terms of antibody levels against PT, FHA, PRN and FIM2/3. This article presents the design and results of the first phase of the collaborative study to establish the optimal conditions for immunisation and bleeding of mice in order to produce a large pool of hyper-immune serum against the 5 antigens. After the characterisation of this pool, cBRP pilot lots were manufactured by freeze-drying diluted solutions of the hyper-immune serum pool. The pilot lots were then characterised in two Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) for their antibody contents against aP vaccine antigens using in-house ELISA (based on methods developed by 2 European vaccine manufacturers) and Multiplex Immunoassay (MIA) methods. The antibody titres recovered demonstrated that a dilution factor of 1/40 could be considered for the scaled-up manufacture of candidate reference preparations (cBRPs). Three batches (15 000 vials) of cBRP were manufactured and fully characterised. In light of the data obtained, and although titration results between the ELISA methods were sometimes discrepant, it was agreed that the establishment study (phase 2) could be launched. Real-time and accelerated stability studies were also included in the first study phase to document the stability of the cBRPs in freeze-dried form and after reconstitution and storage at -20°C±5°C. The results showed that the stability of the freeze-dried cBRPs at usual storage and shipment temperatures is acceptable and that reconstituted cBRP solutions are stable for 12 months at -20°C±5°C. It could therefore be recommended to freeze small aliquots of the 1 mL solution obtained by the reconstitution of one BRP vial in order to store them for use in separate assays. With the application of this strategy, the stocks of the BRP1 replacement batches should cover the needs of OMCLs and manufacturers for at least the next decade.

Large numbers of mice are used in testing during the production of Clostridial vaccines. Previous work has indicated that cell line assays could replace mouse tests for certain aspects of this testing. Replacement assays have been developed for the testing of the toxins and toxoids of several clostridial species but none of these assays have been assessed in an international collaborative study. Under the common aegis of the European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) and of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), collaborative study BSP130 was initiated to evaluate Vero cell based alternative methods to the current mouse tests used to measure the toxicity of Clostridium septicum toxin (the minimum lethal dose (MLD) test), the freedom from toxicity of C. septicum toxoid (the MLD test) and the antigenicity of C. septicum toxoid (the total combining power (TCP) test). The principal aims of BSP130 were to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro assays and to demonstrate concordance of the proposed in vitro and current in vivo TCP and MLD tests. 11 laboratories from 7 countries participated in the collaborative study and each tested 6 toxins and 6 toxoids. The participants' Vero cell lines were up to 1 000 times more sensitive than the mouse strains. The MLD assay in mice and on Vero cells generally ranked the toxins in a similar order in most of the laboratories. The TCP assay in mice and on Vero cells also generally ranked the toxoids in a similar order in most of the laboratories. The results demonstrate that the repeatability and reproducibility of the in vitro Vero cell based assays are no worse than that of the in vivo assays and that they are easily transferable to other laboratories. The concordance correlations between the in vivo and in vitro methods were for the MLD assays ρc=0.961 (log-transformed values) and ρc=0.921 (non-log-transformed values) and for the TCP assays ρc=0.968 (log-transformed values) and ρc=0.980 (non log-transformed values). These correlations are excellent showing that the Vero cell assays can be used as alternatives to the mouse tests for the assessment of C. septicum toxin MLD and toxoid TCP values. This study can be used by vaccine manufacturing companies as a guide for applying the same approach to other clostridial toxins and toxoids.

: The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph 1316 \u0027Erythropoietin concentrated solution\u0027 prescribes that the dimer content of therapeutic erythropoietin (EPO) preparations must not exceed 2% as determined by Size-Exclusion Chromatography (SEC). This report describes the evaluation of a candidate Chemical Reference Substance (cCRS) to serve as system suitability reference material for the qualification of SEC systems used to assess dimer and oligomer content in EPO solutions. The study organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines \u0026 HealthCare (EDQM) was performed with the participation of six European laboratories which tested the candidate material and the EPO for physicochemical tests CRS batch 1. The candidate material was shown to be a suitable reference material for the determination of the resolving capability of the SEC system for separation of dimer and higher oligomers from monomeric EPO. The cCRS was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Erythropoietin for SEC system suitability CRS batch 1 following consideration of the report. The importance of the resolving capability of the SEC system, as defined by the peak ratios or the peak-to-valley resolution, together with the asymmetry of the peaks eluted, and the linear response of the UV detector were all seen as critical parameters. Therefore, the monograph Erythropoietin concentrated solution (1316) was revised concomitantly to take account of the CRS and to set acceptance criteria for these critical parameters..

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph 1316 'Erythropoietin concentrated solution' prescribes that the dimer content of therapeutic erythropoietin (EPO) preparations must not exceed 2% as determined by Size-Exclusion Chromatography (SEC). This report describes the evaluation of a candidate Chemical Reference Substance (cCRS) to serve as system suitability reference material for the qualification of SEC systems used to assess dimer and oligomer content in EPO solutions. The study organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) was performed with the participation of six European laboratories which tested the candidate material and the EPO for physicochemical tests CRS batch 1. The candidate material was shown to be a suitable reference material for the determination of the resolving capability of the SEC system for separation of dimer and higher oligomers from monomeric EPO. The cCRS was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission as Erythropoietin for SEC system suitability CRS batch 1 following consideration of the report. The importance of the resolving capability of the SEC system, as defined by the peak ratios or the peak-to-valley resolution, together with the asymmetry of the peaks eluted, and the linear response of the UV detector were all seen as critical parameters. Therefore, the monograph Erythropoietin concentrated solution (1316) was revised concomitantly to take account of the CRS and to set acceptance criteria for these critical parameters..

Before release onto the market, it must be demonstrated that the total and free polysaccharide (poly ribosyl-ribitol-phosphate, PRP) content of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine complies with requirements. However, manufacturers use different methods to assay PRP content: a national control laboratory must establish and validate the relevant manufacturer methodology before using it to determine PRP content. An international study was organised by the World Health Organization (WHO), in collaboration with the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the Council of Europe/European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) and of the European Union Commission, to verify the suitability of a single method for determining PRP content in liquid pentavalent vaccines (DTwP-HepB-Hib) containing a whole-cell pertussis component. It consists of HCl hydrolysis followed by chromatographic separation and quantification of ribitol on a CarboPac MA1 column using high-performance anion exchange chromatography coupled with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). The unconjugated, free, PRP is separated from the total PRP using C4 solid-phase extraction cartridges (SPE C4). Ten quality control laboratories performed two independent analyses applying the proposed analytical test protocol to five vaccine samples, including a vaccine lot with sub-potent PRP content and very high free PRP content. Both WHO PRP standard and ribitol reference standard were included as calibrating standards. A significant bias between WHO PRP standard and ribitol reference standard was observed. Study results showed that the proposed analytical method is, in principle, suitable for the intended use provided that a validation is performed as usually expected from quality control laboratories.

Detection of viral contamination in plasma donations is critical to prevent transmission of infectious diseases. The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph 1646 'Human plasma (pooled and treated for virus inactivation)', requires that plasma pools used for the manufacture of this product be tested, among others, for the presence of hepatitis A virus RNA by nucleic acid testing (NAT) using a positive control containing 100 International Units (IU) of hepatitis A virus (HAV) RNA per mL. To this end, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe) organised an international collaborative study under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme, for the establishment of the 1st Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for HAV RNA for NAT testing. A freeze-dried candidate material was thus prepared and calibrated against the WHO 2nd International Standard for HAV for NAT (00/562) in a study in which thirteen European and North American laboratories including Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs), manufacturers of plasma-derived products, producers of in vitro diagnostic kits and a blood transfusion centre participated. Based on the outcome of the study, an HAV RNA content of 40 000 IU/vial (corresponding approximately to 4.6 log10 IU/vial) was assigned to the BRP, which was adopted by the Ph. Eur. Commission in March 2016 as Ph. Eur. hepatitis A virus RNA for NAT testing BRP batch 1.

The European Pharmacopoeia Biological Reference Preparation (Ph. Eur. BRP) for Factor VIII Concentrate batch 5 was established through a collaborative study involving 14 laboratories organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM, Council of Europe) to be used as working standard for potency determination of human coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) preparations. The potency of the BRP batch 5 was assigned with reference to the WHO 8th International Standard (IS) for FVIII Concentrate and the BRP batch 4. Participants were instructed to perform 3 independent Factor VIII potency assays following their own routine validated methods by the chromogenic assay as it is the assay prescribed by the European Pharmacopoeia. This publication reports the results obtained during the study. The consensus potency, 9.9 IU/ampoule (n = 14) when assessed against both standards, with inter-laboratory geometric coefficients of variation (GCV) of 3.2 % and 1.9 % against the WHO 8th IS and the BRP batch 4 respectively, was consistent with the expected value. The Ph. Eur. BRP batch 5 is a freeze-dried, plasma-derived concentrate. Based on accelerated degradation studies, the stability of the material is suitable as a reference preparation. The Ph. Eur. BRP batch 5 was adopted at the 151st session of the European Pharmacopoeia Commission in March 2015 and is available from the EDQM.

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) general chapter 5.14. Gene transfer medicinal products for human use suggests the use of absorbance measurements at 260 nm to determine the DNA concentration of plasmid vectors used for the preparation of gene therapy products for human use. An international collaborative study was organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) to confirm the suitability of UV spectrophotometry for the quantification of plasmid vectors used in gene therapy (GT). Three Official Medicine Control Laboratories (OMCLs of the European OMCL Network) and members of the OMCL Working Group for GT products took part in the study, in which various types of spectrophotometers were assessed using common test samples. Results of the study demonstrated that UV spectrophotometry can be considered suitable for the quantification of plasmid DNA in GT products regardless of the instrument used.

To date, the potency of allergen products in Europe is expressed in manufacturer-specific units relative to a product-specific in-house reference. Consequently, cross-product comparability of allergen products from different manufacturers with respect to strength and efficacy is impossible. The Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) project BSP090 addresses this issue via the establishment of reference standards in conjunction with ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Since the initiation of BSP090, the recombinant major allergen Bet v 1 has been adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission as a Chemical Reference Substance (CRS). In parallel, two sandwich ELISA systems for quantification of Bet v 1 were found suitable in preliminary phases of BSP090 to be validated in a large collaborative study. In this study, the candidate ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy, precision and variability. Thirteen participating laboratories tested model samples containing the CRS as well as spiked and unspiked birch pollen extracts. Both in pre-testing and in the collaborative study, the 2 candidate ELISA systems confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. As no clear-cut decision for one of the ELISA systems could be made based on the results of the collaborative study, a post-study testing was performed. Bet v 1 content of 30 birch pollen allergen products was determined in parallel in both ELISA systems. Consequently, 1 candidate ELISA system was selected to be proposed as the future European Pharmacopoeia standard method for Bet v 1 quantification.

Background: The BSP090 project aims at establishing European Pharmacopoeia Reference Substances in combination with the corresponding ELISA methods for the quantification of major allergens in allergen products. Two sandwich ELISAs proved suitable for quantification of Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in preceding phases of BSP090.Methods: Two Bet v 1-specific ELISA systems were compared with respect to accuracy and precision in a ring trial including 13 laboratories. Model samples containing recombinant rBet v 1.0101 as well as native birch pollen extracts were measured independently at least three times in each facility. The assessment was completed with a comparative quantification of Bet v 1 in 30 marketed birch allergen products in one laboratory, simulating the future use as reference method.Results: In the collaborative study, both candidate ELISAs confirmed their suitability to quantify recombinant and native Bet v 1. ELISA-A showed higher precision and lower interlaboratory variability, yet ELISA-B exhibited slightly higher accuracy. Subsequent parallel measurement of Bet v 1 in a panel of 'real-life' birch allergen products indicated better repeatability of ELISA-B. Both systems detected substantial differences in Bet v 1 content between allergen products, but the effect was more pronounced using ELISA-B due to persistently higher values compared to ELISA-A.Conclusions: In the collaborative study, no deciding differences were observed between the two candidate ELISAs. Further comparison under conditions simulating the intended use combined with the criterion of long-term availability enabled the selection of one Bet v 1-specific ELISA for proposal as European Pharmacopoeia standard method.

Current regulations for acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines require that they are tested for the presence of residual or reversion-derived pertussis toxin (PTx) activity using the mouse histamine sensitisation test (HIST). Although a CHO cell clustering assay can be used by manufacturers to verify if sufficient inactivation of the substance has occurred in-process, this assay cannot be used at present for the final product due to the presence of aluminium adjuvants which interfere with mammalian cell cultures. Recently, 2 modified CHO cell clustering assays which accommodate for the adjuvant effects have been proposed as alternatives to the HIST. These modified assays eliminate the adjuvant-induced cytotoxicity either through dilution of the vaccine (called the Direct Method) or by introducing a porous barrier between the adjuvant and the cells (the Indirect Method). Transferability and suitability of these methods for testing of products present on the European market were investigated during a collaborative study organised by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). Thirteen laboratories participated in this study which included 4 aP-containing vaccines spiked by addition of PTx. This study also assessed the transferability of a standardised CHO cell clustering assay protocol for use with non-adjuvanted PTx preparations. Results showed that the majority of laboratories were able to detect the PTx spike in all 4 vaccines at concentrations of 4 IU/mL or lower using the Indirect Method. This sensitivity is in the range of the theoretical sensitivity of the HIST. The Direct Method however did not show the expected results and would need additional development work.

The current European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) texts for Interferon (IFN)-alfa-2 include a nonspecific photometric protein assay using albumin as calibrator and a highly variable cell-based assay for the potency determination of the protective effects. A request was expressed by the Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) for improved methods for the batch control of recombinant interferon alfa-2 bulk and market surveillance testing of finished products, including those formulated with Human Serum Albumin (HSA). A HPLC method was developed at the Medical Products Agency (MPA, Sweden) for the testing of IFN-alfa-2 products. An initial collaborative study run under the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP; study code BSP039) revealed the need for minor changes to improve linearity of the calibration curves, assay reproducibility and robustness. The goal of the collaborative study, coded BSP071, was to transfer and further validate this improved HPLC method. Ten laboratories participated in the study. Four marketed IFN-alfa-2 preparations (one containing HSA) together with the Ph. Eur. Chemical Reference Substance (CRS) for IFN-alfa-2a and IFN-alfa-2b, and in-house reference standards from two manufacturers were used for the quantitative assay. The modified method was successfully transferred to all laboratories despite local variation in equipment. The resolution between the main and the oxidised forms of IFN-alfa-2 was improved compared to the results from the BSP039 study. The improved method even allowed partial resolution of an extra peak after the principal peak. Symmetry of the main IFN peak was acceptable for all samples in all laboratories. Calibration curves established with the Ph. Eur. IFN-alfa-2a and IFN-alfa-2b CRSs showed excellent linearity with intercepts close to the origin and coefficients of determination greater than 0.9995. Assay repeatability, intermediate precision and reproducibility varied with the tested sample within acceptable ranges. Test accuracy estimated by comparing the values obtained by the participants to the declared contents determined by the manufacturers was good despite the absence of a common reference preparation. In conclusion, the present study showed that the new method is suitable, reproducible and transferable. Proposals for the revision of Ph. Eur. texts are presented.

Inactivated poliomyelitis vaccines are an important part of the World Health Organization (WHO) control strategy to eradicate poliomyelitis. Requirements for the quality control of poliomyelitis vaccines (inactivated) include the use of an in vitro D antigen quantification assay for potency determination on the final lot as outlined in the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph 0214. Performance of this assay requires a reference preparation calibrated in International Units (IU). A Ph. Eur. biological reference preparation (BRP) for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated) calibrated in IU has been established for this purpose. Due to the dwindling stocks of batch 2 of the BRP a collaborative study was run as part of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) Biological Standardisation Programme to establish BRP batch 3 (BRP3). Twelve laboratories including Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) and manufacturers participated. The candidate BRP3 (cBRP3) was from the same source and had the same characteristics as BRP batch 2 (BRP2). During the study the candidate was calibrated against the 3rd International Standard for inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine using in-house D antigen ELISA assays in line with the Ph. Eur. monograph 0214. The candidate was also compared to BRP2 to evaluate the continuity. Based on the results of the study, values of 320 DU/mL, 78 DU/mL and 288 DU/mL (D antigen units/mL) (IU) for poliovirus type 1, 2 and 3 respectively were assigned to the candidate. In June 2016, the Ph. Eur. Commission adopted the material as Ph. Eur. BRP for poliomyelitis vaccine (inactivated) batch 3.

The European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) prescribes the control of the activity of low molecular mass heparins by assays for anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities (monograph 0828), using a reference standard calibrated in International Units (IU). An international collaborative study coded BSP133 was launched in the framework of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) run under the aegis of the Council of Europe and the European Commission to calibrate replacement batches for the dwindling stocks of the Heparin low-molecular-mass for assay Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch 8. Thirteen official medicines control and manufacturers laboratories from European and non-European countries took part in this study to calibrate two freeze-dried candidate batches against the 3rd International Standard (IS) for heparin, low molecular weight (11/176; 3rd IS). The Heparin low-molecular-mass for assay BRP (batch 8) was also included in the test panel to check the continuity between subsequent BRP batches. Taking into account the stability data, the results of this collaborative study and on the basis of the central statistical analysis performed at the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), the 2 candidate batches were officially adopted by the Commission of the European Pharmacopoeia as Heparin low-molecular-mass for assay BRP batches 9 and 10 with assigned anti-Xa activities of 102 and 100 IU/vial and anti-IIa activities of 34 and 33 IU/vial respectively.

Organization (WHO) International Standard (IS) for bleomycin complex A2/B2. Eight laboratories from different countries participated. Potencies of the candidate material were estimated by microbiological assays with sensitive micro-organisms. To ensure continuity between consecutive batches, the 1(st) IS for bleomycin complex A2/B2 was used as a reference. Based on the results of the study, the 2(nd) IS for bleomycin complex A2/B2 was adopted at the meeting of the WHO Expert Committee for Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2014 with an assigned potency of 12 500 International Units (IU) per vial. The 2(nd) IS for bleomycin complex A2/B2 is available from the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM).

An international collaborative study was organised jointly by the World Health Organization (WHO)/National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC), the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) and the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM/Council of Europe) for the establishment of harmonised replacement endotoxin standards for these 3 organisations. Thirty-five laboratories worldwide, including Official Medicines Control Laboratories (OMCLs) and manufacturers enrolled in the study. Three candidate preparations (10/178, 10/190 and 10/196) were produced with the same material and same formulation as the current reference standards with the objective of generating a new (3(rd)) International Standard (IS) with the same potency (10 000 IU/vial) as the current (2(nd)) IS, as well as new European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.). and USP standards. The suitability of the candidate preparations to act as the reference standard in assays for endotoxin performed according to compendial methods was evaluated. Their potency was calibrated against the WHO 2(nd) IS for Endotoxin (94/580). Gelation and photometric methods produced similar results for each of the candidate preparations. The overall potency estimates for the 3 batches were comparable. Given the intrinsic assay precision, the observed differences between the batches may be considered unimportant for the intended use of these materials. Overall, these results were in line with those generated for the establishment of the current preparations of reference standards. Accelerated degradation testing of vials stored at elevated temperatures supported the long-term stability of the 3 candidate preparations. It was agreed between the 3 organisations that batch 10/178 be shared between WHO and EDQM and that batches 10/190 and 10/196 be allocated to USP, with a common assigned value of 10 000 IU/vial. This value maintains the continuity of the global harmonisation of reference materials and unitage for the testing of endotoxins in parenteral pharmaceutical products. Based on the results of the collaborative study, batch 10/178 was established by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission as the Ph. Eur. Endotoxin Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) batch 5. The same batch was also established by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation (ECBS) of WHO as the WHO 3(rd) IS for Endotoxin. Batch 10/190 was adopted as the USP Endotoxin Reference Standard, lot H0K354 and vials from this same batch (10/190) will serve as the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) Endotoxin Standard, EC-7.

The current batch of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Reagents (BRRs) used for the in vitro potency assay of hepatitis A vaccines (HAV) by ELISA (enzymelinked immunosorbent assay) was established in 2012 for use in conjunction with Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.7.14 Assay of hepatitis A vaccine. It is composed of a coating reagent and a set of detection antibodies. As stocks of the latter are running low, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) organised a collaborative study to qualify replacement batches. The candidate BRR antibodies (primary monoclonal antibody and labelled secondary antibody) were prepared under appropriate conditions from starting materials similar to those used for the current batches. The new batches of antibodies were tested alongside previous batches of BRRs to ensure continuity, and the results confirmed that they were suitable for use in the potency assay of hepatitis A vaccines by ELISA using the standard method referenced in Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.7.14 at the same final concentrations as the previous batches, i.e. 1:500 for the primary monoclonal antibody and 1:400 for the secondary conjugated antibody. The outcome of the study allowed their establishment by the Ph. Eur. Commission in March 2015 as anti-hepatitis A virus primary detection antibody BRR batch 3 and conjugated secondary detection antibody BRR batch 3 respectively. They are available from the EDQM as hepatitis A vaccine ELISA detection antibodies set BRR batch 3.

The current hepatitis A vaccine (HAV), inactivated, non-adsorbed, European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) is used for the in vitro potency assay of HAV as prescribed by the Ph. Eur. general chapter 2.7.14 Assay of hepatitis A vaccine. This reference preparation was calibrated in 2008 through an international collaborative study and was assigned a potency of 12 IU/mL. During use of this BRP it appeared to be inapplicable in certain cases due to a low nominal antigen content. Consequently, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines and HealthCare (EDQM) established replacement batches for this BRP, calibrated against the 1(st) WHO International Standard (IS) for HAV (inactivated), using the standard in vitro ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) method validated previously. The results of the study showed that the candidate BRPs were suitable for the intended purpose, and following completion of the study, they were adopted in November 2014 by the Ph. Eur. Commission as HAV (inactivated, non-adsorbed) BRP batches 2 and 3, with an assigned potency of 1350 IU/mL, for in vitro antigen content determination by ELISA. As the amount of material in each vial largely exceeds the amount required for the performance of a single assay, the BRPs are to be aliquoted by users as single-use aliquots and refrozen below -50 °C prior to their use as reference preparations.

Rabies is a deadly zoonotic disease. Control of rabies in animals by vaccination is an important strategy to protect humans from infection and control the spread of the disease. Requirements for the quality control of rabies vaccines (inactivated) for veterinary use include an in vivo quantitative potency determination as outlined in the Ph. Eur. monograph 0451. Performance of this assay requires a reference preparation calibrated in International Units (IU). A European Pharmacopeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) for rabies vaccines (inactivated) for veterinary use, calibrated in IU, has been established for this purpose. Due to the dwindling stocks of the current batch (batch 4) of Ph. Eur. BRP for rabies vaccines (inactivated) for veterinary use, a collaborative study was run as part of the EDQM Biological Standardisation Programme to establish BRP batch 5. Ten laboratories, including Official Medicines Control Laboratories and manufacturers, participated. The candidate BRP5 was assayed against the 6(th) International Standard for rabies vaccine using the in vivo vaccination-challenge assay (monograph 0451) to assign a potency value. The candidate was also compared to BRP batch 4 to establish continuity. Taking into account the results from the comparisons a potency of 10 IU/vial was assigned and in March 2015 the Ph. Eur. Commission adopted the material as Ph. Eur. BRP for rabies vaccines (inactivated) for veterinary use batch 5. In addition to the in vivo assay 3 laboratories tested the candidate material using their in-house in vitro assays for information.