Efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) for peripheral arthritis in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been established in randomized clinical trials that have used improvement in summated joint counts as an outcome. Whether joints at different anatomical locations might respond differentially to TNFi remains unknown. The aim of the study was to investigate potential variations in the responsiveness to a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) among joints at distinct locations in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated in routine clinical care. Bionaive PsA patients from nine European countries were included in this observational cohort study if ≥ 1 joint was swollen at the initiation of a first TNFi as monotherapy or added to methotrexate. Only the 28-joint count was available without imaging data confirming the presence of synovitis. The primary outcome was time to first resolution of joint swelling at each joint level. Hazard ratios (HR) for resolution comparing different joint locations were estimated using interval-censored mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models, including a random effect for country and patient, adjusted for age and sex. A total of 1729 patients with 8397 swollen joints at the start of TNFi were included. Considering the upper extremity, a higher rate of resolution of joint swelling (HR, 95

OBJECTIVES:To investigate sex differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among axSpA patients initiating their first TNFi and identify factors contributing to these disparities over the follow-up. METHODS:Data were included from 15 EuroSpA registries and consisted of axSpA patients initiating their first TNFi, with ≥2 measurements for each analysed PROM (BASDAI and BASFI, scale 0-100) taken at any time point. Linear mixed models were employed to analyse sex differences in PROMs over 24 months and to evaluate how baseline characteristics were related to the observed sex differences. RESULTS:We analysed 13 102 (38% women) in the BASDAI analyses and 10 623 (38% women) in the BASFI analyses. At follow-up, mean sex differences in BASDAI increased from 4.3 units at baseline (95% CI, 3.5-5.1) to 8.0 (7.2-8.8) at 6 months, and in BASFI from 2.2 (1.4-3.1) to 4.6 (3.6-5.5), with consistently worse scores in women. Baseline characteristics could not substantially account for the observed sex differences over time; however, the magnitude of the sex differences was reduced by HLA-B27 positivity, longer disease duration, and increased CRP levels, but increased by TNFi initiation in later years and peripheral arthritis. CONCLUSION:In axSpA patients initiating their first TNFi, baseline sex differences in BASDAI and BASFI increased two-fold after 6 months of treatment and persisted thereafter, with worse scores in women. Several baseline characteristics moderated the sex differences, though none could fully account for them. These findings improve our understanding of sex differences and underscore their importance in axSpA.

Objectives We aimed to compare various methods for imputing disease activity in longitudinally collected observational data of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).Methods We conducted a simulation study on data from 8583 axSpA patients from ten European registries. Disease activity was assessed by the Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and the corresponding low disease activity (LDA; ASDAS<2.1) state at baseline, 6 and 12 months. We focused on cross-sectional methods which impute missing values of an individual at a particular time point based on the available information from other individuals at that time point. We applied nine single and five multiple imputation methods, covering mean, regression and hot deck methods. The performance of each imputation method was evaluated via relative bias and coverage of 95% confidence intervals for the mean ASDAS and the derived proportion of patients in LDA.Results Hot deck imputation methods outperformed mean and regression methods, particularly when assessing LDA. Multiple imputation procedures provided better coverage than the corresponding single imputation ones. However, none of the evaluated methods produced unbiased estimates with adequate coverage across all time points, with performance for missing baseline data being worse than for missing follow-up data. Predictive mean and weighted predictive mean hot deck imputation procedures consistently provided results with low bias.Conclusions This study contributes to the available methods for imputing disease activity in observational research. Hot deck imputation using predictive mean matching exhibited the highest robustness and is thus our suggested approach.

Introduction:The treatment of psoriatic disease is frequently complex, and many patients do not respond to the available therapies. While novel therapies like biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been utilized individually to treat psoriatic disease, limited data are available regarding the effect and potential side effects of combining these agents in treatment. Case Presentations:We present a case series of 6 patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease treated with tofacitinib and a biologic (5 treated with IL-23 inhibitors and 1 with an IL-17 inhibitor). All patients had tried multiple treatments prior to initiating combination therapy with tofacitinib and a biologic. Out of the 6 patients, 2 remained on combination therapy, while 4 discontinued either one or both drugs due to lack of response or intolerance. We observed a varying effectiveness of the combination therapy, with an overall positive effect on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis but no effect on inflammatory bowel disease. No major treatment-emergent adverse events occurred during the combination therapy period. Conclusion:This case series adds to the sparse data on combining biologics and JAK inhibitors for the treatment of psoriatic disease. Advanced combination therapy with a JAK inhibitor and a targeted biologic agent may represent a relevant treatment option in selected cases of treatment-refractory psoriatic disease. However, larger studies are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of this combination.

Objectives To investigate lectin pathway proteins (LPPs) and complement activation marker C3dg as biomarkers for disease activity and treatment response in a multicentre, randomized controlled trial of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients initiating TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy. Methods Serum samples from 108 patients with active radiographic axSpA from the CONSUL study, collected before and after 12 weeks of TNFi therapy, were measured using immunoassays for LPPs (MBL, CL-L1, M-, L-, and H-ficolin, MASP-1, -2, and -3, MAp44) and the complement activation marker C3dg. Results After 12 weeks of TNFi therapy, serum levels of LPPs L-ficolin, M-ficolin, and MASP-2 decreased, while MASP-3 increased after adjustment for baseline CRP. Baseline L-ficolin levels correlated positively with baseline ASDAS-CRP and BASFI. C3dg correlated positively with ASDAS-CRP. Conversely, MASP-1 and MAp44 correlated negatively with ASDAS-CRP. Assessed by univariate logistic regression, C3dg and MASP-1 were associated with treatment response of clinically important improvement (Delta ASDAS-CRP >= 1.1) and inactive disease (ASDAS-CRP <1.3) at week 12, respectively. Only C3dg remained significant in a multivariate regression analysis. Conclusion In this study, complement LPPs L-ficolin, M-ficolin, and MASP-2 levels decrease following initiation of TNFi therapy, whereas alternative pathway critical component MASP-3 increases. Baseline L-ficolin and C3dg correlated positively with ASDAS-CRP, potentially by CRP influence. Nevertheless, baseline C3dg levels were associated with treatment response (ASDAS-CRP <1.3) at week 12. Our results provide important perspectives on the inflammatory processes in axSpA, shedding light on the involvement of the complement system related to disease activity, treatment response, and potentially to prognosis.

Background: Observational data on composite scores often comes with missing component information. When a complete-case (CC) analysis of composite scores is unbiased, preferable approaches of dealing with missing component information should also be unbiased and provide a more precise estimate. We assessed the performance of several methods compared to CC analysis in estimating the means of common composite scores used in axial spondyloarthritis research. Methods: Individual mean imputation (IMI), the modified formula method (MF), overall mean imputation (OMI), and multiple imputation of missing component values (MI) were assessed either analytically or by means of simulations from available data collected across Europe. Their performance in estimating the means of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) in cases where component information was set missing completely at random was compared to the CC approach based on bias, variance, and coverage. Results: Like the MF method, IMI uses a modified formula for observations with missing components resulting in modified composite scores. In the case of an unbiased CC approach, these two methods yielded representative samples of the distribution arising from a mixture of the original and modified composite scores, which, however, could not be considered the same as the distribution of the original score. The IMI and MF method are, thus, intrinsically biased. OMI provided an unbiased mean but displayed a complex dependence structure among observations that, if not accounted for, resulted in severe coverage issues. MI improved precision compared to CC and gave unbiased means and proper coverage as long as the extent of missingness was not too large. Conclusions: MI of missing component values was the only method found successful in retaining CC’s unbiasedness and in providing increased precision for estimating the means of BASDAI, BASFI, and ASDAS-CRP. However, since MI is susceptible to incorrect implementation and its performance may become questionable with increasing missingness, we consider the implementation of an error-free CC approach a valid and valuable option. Trial registration: Not applicable as study uses data from patient registries.

OBJECTIVE:In patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) initiating secukinumab (SEC), we aimed to identify baseline (treatment start) predictors of achieving low disease activity (LDA) after 6 months, as measured by the Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), as well as treatment continuation after 12 months. METHODS:From 11 European registries, patients with axSpA who initiated SEC treatment in routine care, with available data on 6-month ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI assessments were included. Logistic regression analyses on multiply imputed baseline data were performed; potential baseline predictors included demographic, diagnosis, lifestyle, clinical, and patient-reported variables. RESULTS:In a pooled cohort of 1174 patients with axSpA, 5 of 19 potential assessed variables were mutually predictive for achieving LDA by ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI: higher physician global assessment score, noncurrent smoking, lack of prior exposure to biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, and lower Health Assessment Questionnaire scores and BASDAI scores. Moreover, radiographic axSpA and CRP ≤ 10 mg/L were associated with achieving ASDAS-CRP LDA, and HLA-B27 positivity and history of psoriasis with achieving BASDAI LDA, whereas earlier time of secukinumab initiation (2015-2017) was associated with treatment continuation. CONCLUSION:In this European real-world study of patients with axSpA initiating SEC, predictors of achieving LDA by ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI at 6 months and remaining on treatment at 12 months included both clinical, patient-reported, and lifestyle factors, underscoring the complex mechanisms of real-world drug effectiveness.

BACKGROUND:To investigate a patient-level single imputation approach for patient reported outcomes (PROs) that express similar contents or associated PROs, where a PRO whose value is missing at a particular timepoint is substituted by another PRO whose value is available at the same timepoint. METHODS:We performed a simulation study on registry-based spondyloarthritis data to explore the potential interchangeability between the patient pain (PPA) and fatigue (PFA) assessment scores and relevant Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) individual questions, and between PPA, PFA and patient global assessment (PGA). Performance was assessed per imputation method in terms of relative bias and coverage. Sample size, level of missingness and missing data pattern were included as parameters in the simulations. RESULTS:All applied scenarios to interchange PPA with BASDAI question 2 (axial pain), BASDAI question 3 (peripheral joint pain/swelling) or their average failed. Interchangeability between PFA and BASDAI question 1 (fatigue/tiredness) was acceptable for partially (up to 50%) missing data. When interchanging patient assessment scores (PPA, PFA and PGA), we observed inconsistent results in terms of performance. The performance of the applied methods depended on the sample size and the level of missingness, but not heavily on the underlying missing data pattern. CONCLUSIONS:Interchanging PFA and the BASDAI fatigue question was justified for partially missing data, while interchangeability between PPA, PFA and PGA, and between PPA and the BASDAI pain questions was not advised. Our findings suggest that registering patient assessment scores and BASDAI questions is recommended.

What does this mean for patients?People with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) often have many other health issues. These issues may affect their arthritis treatment, but we do not know how. To study this, we first need to know what data there are. Are these health issues being recorded in the clinics? This might be in local or national registries. We also need to know if different registries record data in similar ways. If they do, researchers can gather more information on the same health issues from many registries. We surveyed 17 registries in Europe to determine this. We asked if, and how, they record data on 58 health issues. We found that heart disease, gut disease, infections, psoriasis and uveitis are regularly recorded. Many registries used similar methods to record data. Our findings can help to pave the way for future research, leading to better treatment strategies for people with PsA and axSpA.

OBJECTIVE:To explore the registration of enthesitis among biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment across 12 European registries, compare the disease burden and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients with and without enthesitis, and assess the enthesitis treatment response. METHOD:Demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs at first TNFi (TNFi-1) initiation (baseline) were assessed in patients with PsA, diagnosed by a rheumatologist, with versus without assessment of entheses and between those with versus without enthesitis. Enthesitis scores and resolution frequency were identified at follow-up. RESULTS:Of 10 547 patients in the European Spondyloarthritis (EuroSpA) Research Collaboration Network initiating TNFi, 1357 underwent evaluation for enthesitis. Eight registries included a validated scoring system for enthesitis. At baseline, 874 patients underwent entheses assessment [Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) 485 patients, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) 389 patients]. Enthesitis was detected by MASES in 170/485 (35%, mean score ± sd 3.1 ± 2.4) and by SPARCC in 236/389 (61%, 4 ± 3.4). Achilles enthesitis was most frequent, by both MASES (unilateral/bilateral 28%/9%) and SPARCC (48%/18%). MASES/SPARCC baseline and follow-up scores for TNFi-1 were available for 100/105 patients. Of these, 63 patients (63%) (MASES) and 46 (43.8%) (SPARCC) achieved resolution of enthesitis. The site-specific enthesitis resolution was overall lower at SPARCC sites (peripheral; 63-80%) than at MASES sites (mainly axial; 82-100%) following TNFi-1. Disease activity and PROs were worse in patients with versus without enthesitis. CONCLUSION:Entheseal assessments are only registered in a minority of patients with PsA in routine care. When assessed, enthesitis was common, and a substantial proportion demonstrated resolution following treatment with TNFi-1.

Objective To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after initiation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment in European real-world patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Further, to investigate PRO remission rates across treatment courses, registries, disease duration, sex, and age at disease onset. Methods Visual analog scale or numerical rating scale scores for pain, fatigue, patient global assessment (PtGA), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI) from 12,262 patients with PsA initiating a TNFi in 13 registries were pooled. PRO remission rates (pain ≤ 1, fatigue ≤ 2, PtGA ≤ 2, and HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5) were calculated for patients still on the treatment. Results For the first TNFi, median pain score was reduced by approximately 50%, from 6 to 3, 3, and 2; as were fatigue scores, from 6 to 4, 4, and 3; PtGA scores, from 6 to 3, 3, and 2; and HAQ-DI scores, from 0.9 to 0.5, 0.5, and 0.4 at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Six-month Lund Efficacy Index (LUNDEX)–adjusted remission rates for pain, fatigue, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were 24%, 31%, 36%, and 43% (first TNFi); 14%, 19%, 23%, and 29% (second TNFi); and 9%, 14%, 17%, and 20% (third TNFi), respectively. For biologic-naïve patients with disease duration < 5 years, 6-month LUNDEX-adjusted remission rates for pain, fatigue, PtGA, and HAQ-DI scores were 22%, 28%, 33%, and 42%, respectively. Corresponding rates for patients with disease duration > 10 years were 27%, 32%, 41%, and 43%, respectively. Remission rates were 33%, 40%, 45%, and 56% for men and 17%, 23%, 24%, and 32% for women, respectively. For patients aged < 45 years at diagnosis, 6-month LUNDEX-adjusted remission rate for pain was 29% vs 18% for patients ≥ 45 years. Conclusion In 12,262 biologic-naïve patients with PsA, 6 months of treatment with a TNFi reduced pain by approximately 50%. Marked differences in PRO remission rates across treatment courses, registries, disease duration, sex, and age at onset of disease were observed, emphasizing the potential influence of factors other than disease activity on PROs.

OBJECTIVE:Because 66/68 joint counts are not always performed in routine care, we aimed to determine which of the modified 28-joint disease activity index for psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA28) or 28-joint disease activity score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) should be preferred for monitoring disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) when the original DAPSA (66/68 joints) is not available. METHODS:Prospectively collected real-world data of European bionaive patients with PsA initiating a first tumor necrosis factor inhibitor were pooled. Remission and response status were evaluated at 6 months by remission (DAPSA ≤ 4, DAPSA28 ≤ 4, and DAS28-CRP < 2.6), response (75% improvement for DAPSA and DAPSA28), and combined EULAR good/moderate responses for DAS28-CRP. Logistic regression analyses on multiple imputed data were used to identify baseline predictors. RESULTS:Remission and response cohorts included 3,159 and 1,866 patients, respectively. The 6-month proportions achieving remission/response were DAPSA (27%/44%), DAPSA28 (28%/44%), and DAS28-CRP (59%/80%). Of 14 possible baseline predictors, 11 predicted both DAPSA and DAPSA28 remission (8 of which also predicted their response, indicated by "*"): longer disease duration*, male sex*, and higher CRP* were positive, whereas older age*, higher body mass index*, patient fatigue*, and global, physician global, health assessment questionnaire score*, and tender and swollen* joint counts were negative predictors. Eight and five of these predicted DAS28-CRP remission and response, respectively. CONCLUSION:In patients with PsA, DAPSA28 should be preferred over DAS28-CRP as a substitute for DAPSA when 66/68 joint counts are not available because of the large overlap in remission and response status and in predictors between DAPSA and DAPSA28.

Objective: To investigate real-world retention and remission rates in PsA patients initiating a 2nd or 3rd TNFi and the association with reason for discontinuation from the previous TNFi-treatment.Methods: Prospectively collected routine care data from 12 European registries were pooled. Retention rates (Kaplan-Meier estimation) and crude/LUNDEX-adjusted rates of Disease Activity Score 28 and Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAS28 and DAPSA28) remission were calculated and compared with adjusted cox regression analyses and Chi-squared test, respectively).Results: We included 5233 (2nd TNFi) and 1906 (3rd TNFi) patients. Twelve-month retention rates for the 2nd and 3rd TNFi were 68% (95%CI: 67-70%) and 66% (64-68%), respectively. Patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE/LOE had 12-month retention rates of 66%/65% (2nd TNFi), and 65%/63% (3rd TNFi), respectively. Patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to LOE after less vs more than 24 weeks had 12-month retention rates of 54%/69% (2nd TNFi), and 58%/65% (3rd TNFi).Six-month crude/LUNDEX-adjusted DAS28 remission rates were 48%/35% and 38%/27%, and DAPSA28 remission rates were 19%/14% and 14%/10%, for the 2nd and 3rd TNFi.Conclusion: Two-thirds of patients remained on TNFi at 12 months for both the 2nd and 3rd TNFi, while one-third and one-quarter of patients were in DAS28 remission after 6 months on the 2nd and 3rd TNFi. While drug effectiveness was similar in patients who stopped the previous TNFi due to AE compared to overall LOE, drug effectiveness was better in patients who had stopped the previous TNF due to secondary LOE compared to primary LOE.

Objectives: In patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating secukinumab, we aimed to assess and compare the proportion of patients achieving 6-, 12- and 24 -month patient -reported outcomes (PRO) remission and the 24 -month retention rates. Patients and methods: Patients with axSpA or PsA from 16 European registries, who initiated secukinumab in routine care were included. PRO remission rates were defined as pain, fatigue, Patient Global Assessment (PGA) <= 2 (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0-10) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) <= 0.5, for both axSpA and PsA, and were calculated as crude values and adjusted for drug adherence (LUNDEX). Comparisons of axSpA and PsA remission rates were performed using logistic regression analyses (unadjusted and adjusted for multiple confounders). Kaplan -Meier plots with log -rank test and Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess and compare secukinumab retention rates. Results: We included 3087 axSpA and 3246 PsA patients initiating secukinumab. Crude pain, fatigue, PGA and HAQ remission rates were higher in axSpA than in PsA patients, whereas LUNDEX-adjusted remission rates were similar. No differences were found between the patient groups after adjustment for confounders. The 24 -month retention rates were similar in axSpA vs. PsA in fully adjusted analyses (HR [95 %CI] = 0.92 [0.84-1.02]). Conclusion: In this large European real -world study of axSpA and PsA patients treated with secukinumab, we demonstrate for the first time a comparable effectiveness in PRO remission and treatment retention rates between these two conditions when adjusted for confounders.

To evaluate tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) drug-levels and presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb) in patients with inflammatory arthritis who taper TNFi compared to TNFi continuation. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis on stable TNFi dose and in low disease activity ≥ 12 months were randomised (2:1) to disease activity-guided tapering or control. Blood samples at baseline, 12- and 18-months were evaluated for TNFi drug-levels and ADAb. In total, 129 patients were randomised to tapering (n = 88) or control (n = 41). Between baseline and month 18, a significant shift in TNFi drug-levels were observed in the tapering group resulting in fewer patients with high drug-levels (change: − 14