Phase I Study Prospective, open-label, first-in-human study, with a pharmacologically-guided adaptive design for dose escalation, de-escalation and study duration. The primary objectives are: To characterize the plasma concentration-time course and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of the drug substances of TLC-ART 101 (LPV, RTV, TFV) administered by subcutaneous injection. To characterize the safety and tolerability of a single subcutaneous injection of TLC-ART 101. There are 4 exploratory mechanistic objectives (with related endpoints)

Supplementary Fig. S6. Detection of short variant gene alterations using the FACT next generation sequencing assay on ctDNA samples from patients dosed at 1400 mg dose (n=23).

Supplementary Fig. S5. Kaplan-Meier estimate of progression-free survival for patients with and without ESR1 mutations in baseline ctDNA samples collected from the 1400 mg dose group.ESR1 data was available for 36 of 36 patients dosed at 1400 mg.

Supplementary Fig. S1. Study scheme.

Supplementary Fig. S2. The PGR z-score for six patients analyzed in Fig. 4.

Supplementary Fig. S4. ESR1 mutation analysis in ctDNA.

Supplementary Fig. S3. Clinical benefit does not correlate with ctDNA ESR1 mutant allele frequency (MAF) baseline levels or dynamics upon treatment, or with baseline ER and PR protein levels by IHC in tumor tissue.

Supplementary Tables S1, S2, and S3.

Long-term follow-up on the persistence of and risk factors for self-reported penicillin allergy (SRPA) following successful delabeling is lacking. We report on the initial 6-month follow-up on the PALACE Study, a parallel, two-arm, non-inferiority, open-label, multicenter, international randomized controlled trial, which demonstrated that direct oral penicillin challenge (DOC; intervention arm) was non-inferior to the standard of care of penicillin skin testing followed by an oral challenge (control arm) in low-risk adult penicillin-allergic adults. A telephone questionnaire was conducted to assess SRPA, adverse events (AEs) and factors associated with SRPA. 356/377 (94%) completed the 6-month follow-up. Twenty-five of the 356 (7%) patients had a SRPA at 6 months. This included 14 [56%] in the intervention (direct oral challenge [DOC]) vs. 11 [44%] in the control arm (skin testing and OC), p = 0.584). Of those with a SRPA, 12/25 (48%) previously reported an AE during the 5-day study period, 2 (8%) were associated with a new AE, and 11 (44%) identified as having a SRPA without an AE. SRPA at 6 months was most strongly associated with a known AE reported in the 2-day initial study period (OR 12.1 95 % CI [4.9, 30.1]). Our follow-up affirms that DOC is a safe and effective procedure for longer-term removal of a penicillin allergy label, with the majority remaining free of SRPA at 6 months with no serious AE reports. Understanding risk factors associated with retention of or relabeling SRPA will help understand personalized testing and follow-up needs.

Abstract BACKGROUND Giredestrant (GIR) is a highly potent, oral, selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader (SERD) that exhibits robust estrogen receptor (ER) occupancy. The Phase II, randomized, open-label acelERA Breast Cancer (BC) study (NCT04576455) assessed GIR vs physician’s choice of endocrine therapy (PCET) in second- or third-line ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced BC (ER+, HER2– aBC). The study did not reach statistical significance for the primary endpoint of investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS); however, the benefit of GIR was of larger magnitude among patients (pts) with ESR1-mutated tumors (ESR1m; a common cause of acquired resistance to endocrine therapy [ET]). We present an exploratory biomarker analysis of circulating tumor (ct)DNA dynamics. METHODS Pts (n = 303) were randomized 1:1 to GIR or PCET (75% of pts had fulvestrant [FUL]; 25%, an aromatase inhibitor). Partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were categorized by RECIST v1.1. Plasma samples taken at Cycle 1, Day 1 (C1D1; n = 229), while on treatment (tx) at C2D1 (n = 220), and at the end of therapy (EOT; n = 155) were evaluated with the FoundationOne Liquid CDx next-generation sequencing assay. Gene mutations were defined as variants with known or likely impact on protein function. Composite tumor fraction (cTF) was defined as the total estimated tumor ctDNA content in each sample, and was only evaluable for a subset of samples (137 C1D1; 136 C2D1; 99 EOT). cTF or ESR1 mutant allele frequency (MAF) changes were calculated as a percent change from C1D1. ESR1m clonality was estimated as variant tumor fraction/estimated tumor fraction. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Mann–Whitney test. RESULTS The overall mutation landscape remained relatively unchanged with GIR tx at C2D1 or EOT, except for ESR1m prevalence, which declined from 43% at C1D1 to 26% on tx and 27% at EOT. With PCET, ESR1m prevalence decreased from 34% at C1D1 to 29% on tx, but increased to 43% by EOT. There were no concordant changes for other top mutated genes in this study, including PIK3CA, TP53, or DNMT3A. cTF decreased on tx in 38/65 (59%) and 32/59 (54%) of evaluable pts with GIR and PCET, respectively; the median change from C1D1 was –23% with GIR compared with –5% with PCET or –15% with FUL. The median change in cTF levels on tx with GIR was significantly greater in pts with a PR (–88%) vs PD (+6%, p = 0.002) or SD (–19%, p = 0.004). The degree of cTF decline on tx with GIR was significantly higher in pts with baseline ESR1m (median change –58%) vs no ESR1m detected (+5%, p = 0.012). Pts with a clonal ESR1m had higher levels of cTF decline on tx vs pts with subclonal ESR1m, suggesting cTF dynamics are a function of tumor heterogeneity. ESR1 MAF decreased on tx in 93% of pts with baseline ESR1m on GIR, vs 60% with PCET and 70% with FUL. ESR1 MAF decline on tx was significantly higher with GIR vs PCET at both C2D1 and EOT (p < 0.0001). The average ESR1 MAF decline on tx with GIR was greater in pts with a PR (–97%) vs PD (–54%, p = 0.025) or SD (–48%, p = 0.051), and all seven GIR-treated pts with a PR showed a near or total loss of ESR1 MAF by C2D1. The ESR1m variants D538G and Y537X had a significantly greater decline in MAF on tx with GIR vs PCET or FUL (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Data show that cTF and ESR1m ctDNA dynamics were associated with clinical response to GIR in ER+, HER2– aBC. ESR1 MAF decline was significantly greater with GIR vs PCET or FUL. ESR1 MAF declined to a greater degree with GIR compared with cTF, which is consistent with the larger magnitude of PFS benefit seen with GIR in pts with ESR1m tumors. The specific ESR1 variants D538G and Y537X showed greater sensitivity to GIR compared with PCET or FUL. Citation Format: Ann Collier, Aditya Bardia, Joo Hyuk Sohn, Elgene Lim, Marianna Chavez, Miguel Martín, Jorge Martinalbo, Pablo Perez-Moreno, Heather Moore. Circulating tumor DNA dynamics in acelERA Breast Cancer: a Phase II study of giredestrant for estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, previously treated advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-05-07.

As CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) approval changed treatment strategies for patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (BC), understanding how exposure to CDK4/6i affects the tumor genomic landscape is critical for precision oncology. Using real-world data (RWD) with tumor genomic profiling from 5910 patients with metastatic HR+/HER2- BC, we investigated the evolution of alteration prevalence in commonly mutated genes across patient journeys. We found that ESR1 is more often altered in tumors exposed to at least 1 year of adjuvant endocrine therapy, contrasting with TP53 alterations. We observed a similar trend after first-line treatments in the advanced setting, but strikingly exposure to aromatase inhibitors (AI) combined with CDK4/6i led to significantly higher ESR1 alteration prevalence compared to AI alone, independent of treatment duration. Further, CDK4/6i exposure was associated with higher occurrence of concomitant alterations in multiple oncogenic pathways. Differences based on CDK4/6i exposure were confirmed in samples collected after 2L and validated in samples from the acelERA BC clinical trial. In conclusion, our work uncovers opportunities for further treatment personalization and stresses the need for effective combination treatments to address the altered tumor genomic landscape following AI+CDK4/6i exposure. Further, we demonstrated the potential of RWD for refining patient treatment strategy and guiding clinical trial design.

BACKGROUND Patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (ER+ mBC) almost always progress on first-line endocrine therapy (ET), which is usually combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Finding effective ET combinations after progression following CDK4/6is remains a challenge. Giredestrant (GIR) is a highly potent, nonsteroidal, oral, selective ER antagonist and degrader. Inavolisib (INAVO) is a highly potent PI3Kα-selective inhibitor that promotes degradation of mutated p110α. After first-line treatment (tx) with a CDK4/6i, PIK3CA mutations (mut), which are common, persist and remain a sensitive oncogenic target in these patients. We present a 16-week interim analysis of GIR vs GIR + INAVO in MORPHEUS BC (NCT04802759). METHODS Patients whose tumors harbored a PIK3CAmut and who had disease progression on up to two lines of endocrine-based therapy (including at least one prior line of CDK4/6i) for locally advanced (LA)/mBC were randomized 1:6 to receive GIR (30 mg orally daily [PO QD]) or GIR + INAVO (9 mg PO QD) tx until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Given the small numbers, the GIR arm is presented for overall safety. Primary endpoints are safety and objective response rate (ORR). Other endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and pharmacokinetics. Genetic alterations were identified centrally in baseline circulating tumor DNA using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx assay. In cases where PIK3CAmut could not be determined centrally, local blood or tissue results are used. RESULTS As of April 18, 2023, seven and 15 patients were enrolled in the GIR and GIR + INAVO arms, respectively; 71% (n = 5) and 67% (n = 10) received one prior line of therapy in the LA/mBC setting; 14% (n = 1) and 33% (n = 5) received two prior lines; and one GIR-arm patient received four prior lines. Prior fulvestrant (FUL) was received by 53% of patients in the GIR + INAVO arm (n = 8). For GIR + INAVO, the ORR was 47% (n = 7); the complete response rate was 7% (n = 1); and the partial response (PR) rate was 40% (n = 6). The DCR at 12 weeks was 80% (12/15 patients). The median PFS was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval = 6.5, not evaluable) with 47% of patients (n = 7) having events. In the GIR + INAVO arm, 5/6 patients with an ESR1mut had a PR (83%) and one (17%) had stable disease. No clinically relevant drug–drug interaction was observed. Safety data are presented in the table. Two patients experienced grade 3 hyperglycemia, one of whom had baseline elevated HbA1c and has been on insulin therapy since the event. The other patient received a single day of insulin treatment. In the GIR + INAVO arm, the incidence of rash and stomatitis (all grade 1) was 13% each. CONCLUSIONS An encouraging efficacy signal was observed with GIR + INAVO when compared cross-trial with BYLieve arm A (PMID: 33794206). ORRs were 47% in MORPHEUS BC vs 21% in BYLieve for patients with measurable disease (although no prior FUL was allowed in BYLieve). Safety of GIR + INAVO was aligned to the individual safety profiles of each of the drugs, with no new safety signals identified and a favorable tolerability profile for a PI3Kα inhibitor-based combination. Table. Safety summary Data are % of patients. AE, adverse event; GIR, giredestrant; INAVO, inavolisib; TRAE, treatment-related adverse event; tx, treatment. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Maria Gion, Cristina Hernando, Kyung Hae Jung, Mafalda Oliveira, Melinda Telli, Gregory Vidal, Sina Vatandoust, Jing Zhu, Richard Schwab, Huy Ngo, Erika Ferreira, Ann Collier, Vanessa Breton, Einav Gal-Yam. Interim analysis of giredestrant + inavolisib in MORPHEUS Breast Cancer: a Phase Ib/II study of giredestrant treatment combinations in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-07.

Despite effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), persons living with HIV harbor reservoirs of persistently infected CD4+ cells, which constitute a barrier to cure. Initiation of ART during acute infection reduces the size of the HIV reservoir, and we hypothesized that in addition, it would favor integration of proviruses in HIV-specific CD4+ T cells, while initiation of ART during chronic HIV infection would favor relatively more proviruses in herpesvirus-specific cells. We further hypothesized that proviruses in acute ART initiators would be integrated into antiviral genes, whereas integration sites (ISs) in chronic ART initiators would favor genes associated with cell proliferation and exhaustion. We found that the HIV DNA distribution across HIV-specific versus herpesvirus-specific CD4+ T cells was as hypothesized. HIV ISs in acute ART initiators were significantly enriched in gene sets controlling lipid metabolism and HIF-1α-mediated hypoxia, both metabolic pathways active in early HIV infection. Persistence of these infected cells during prolonged ART suggests a survival advantage. ISs in chronic ART initiators were enriched in a gene set controlling EZH2 histone methylation, and methylation has been associated with diminished long terminal repeat transcription. These differences that we found in antigen specificities and IS distributions within HIV-infected cells might be leveraged in designing cure strategies tailored to the timing of ART initiation.

Objective: To assess how antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation during acute or early HIV infection (AEHI) affects the viral reservoir and host immune responses. Design: Single-arm trial of ART initiation during AEHI at 30 sites in the Americas, Africa, and Asia. Methods: HIV DNA was measured at week 48 of ART in 5 million CD4(+) T cells by sensitive qPCR assays targeting HIV gag and pol. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with potential HIV T cell epitope peptide pools consisting of env, gag, nef, and pol peptides and stained for expression of CD3, CD4, CD8, and intracellular cytokines/chemokines. Results: From 2017 to 2019, 188 participants initiated ART during Fiebig stages I (n = 6), II (n = 43), III (n = 56), IV (n = 23), and V (n = 60). Median age was 27 years (interquartile range 23-38), 27 (14%) participants were female, and 180 (97%) cisgender. Among 154 virally suppressed participants at week 48, 100% had detectable HIV gag or pol DNA. Participants treated during Fiebig I had the lowest HIV DNA levels (P < 0.001). Week 48 HIV DNA mostly did not correlate with concurrent CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cell HIV-specific immune responses (rho range -0.11 to +0.19, all P > 0.025). At week 48, the magnitude, but not polyfunctionality, of HIV-specific T cell responses was moderately reduced among participants who initiated ART earliest. Conclusion: Earlier ART initiation during AEHI reduced but did not eliminate the persistence of HIV-infected cells in blood. These findings explain the rapid viral rebound observed after ART cessation in early-treated individuals with undetectable HIV DNA by less sensitive methods.

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (ER+ mBC) almost always progress on first-line endocrine therapy (ET), which is usually combined with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Finding effective ET combinations after progression following CDK4/6is remains a challenge. Giredestrant (GIR) is a highly potent, nonsteroidal, oral, selective ER antagonist and degrader. Inavolisib (INAVO) is a highly potent PI3Kα-selective inhibitor that promotes degradation of mutated p110α. After first-line treatment (tx) with a CDK4/6i, PIK3CA mutations (mut), which are common, persist and remain a sensitive oncogenic target in these patients. We present a 16-week interim analysis of GIR vs GIR + INAVO in MORPHEUS BC (NCT04802759). METHODS Patients whose tumors harbored a PIK3CAmut and who had disease progression on up to two lines of endocrine-based therapy (including at least one prior line of CDK4/6i) for locally advanced (LA)/mBC were randomized 1:6 to receive GIR (30 mg orally daily [PO QD]) or GIR + INAVO (9 mg PO QD) tx until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Given the small numbers, the GIR arm is presented for overall safety. Primary endpoints are safety and objective response rate (ORR). Other endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and pharmacokinetics. Genetic alterations were identified centrally in baseline circulating tumor DNA using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx assay. In cases where PIK3CAmut could not be determined centrally, local blood or tissue results are used. RESULTS As of April 18, 2023, seven and 15 patients were enrolled in the GIR and GIR + INAVO arms, respectively; 71% (n = 5) and 67% (n = 10) received one prior line of therapy in the LA/mBC setting; 14% (n = 1) and 33% (n = 5) received two prior lines; and one GIR-arm patient received four prior lines. Prior fulvestrant (FUL) was received by 53% of patients in the GIR + INAVO arm (n = 8). For GIR + INAVO, the ORR was 47% (n = 7); the complete response rate was 7% (n = 1); and the partial response (PR) rate was 40% (n = 6). The DCR at 12 weeks was 80% (12/15 patients). The median PFS was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval = 6.5, not evaluable) with 47% of patients (n = 7) having events. In the GIR + INAVO arm, 5/6 patients with an ESR1mut had a PR (83%) and one (17%) had stable disease. No clinically relevant drug–drug interaction was observed. Safety data are presented in the table. Two patients experienced grade 3 hyperglycemia, one of whom had baseline elevated HbA1c and has been on insulin therapy since the event. The other patient received a single day of insulin treatment. In the GIR + INAVO arm, the incidence of rash and stomatitis (all grade 1) was 13% each. CONCLUSIONS An encouraging efficacy signal was observed with GIR + INAVO when compared cross-trial with BYLieve arm A (PMID: 33794206). ORRs were 47% in MORPHEUS BC vs 21% in BYLieve for patients with measurable disease (although no prior FUL was allowed in BYLieve). Safety of GIR + INAVO was aligned to the individual safety profiles of each of the drugs, with no new safety signals identified and a favorable tolerability profile for a PI3Kα inhibitor-based combination. Table. Safety summary Data are % of patients. AE, adverse event; GIR, giredestrant; INAVO, inavolisib; TRAE, treatment-related adverse event; tx, treatment. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Maria Gion, Cristina Hernando, Kyung Hae Jung, Mafalda Oliveira, Melinda Telli, Gregory Vidal, Sina Vatandoust, Jing Zhu, Richard Schwab, Huy Ngo, Erika Ferreira, Ann Collier, Vanessa Breton, Einav Gal-Yam. Interim analysis of giredestrant + inavolisib in MORPHEUS Breast Cancer: a Phase Ib/II study of giredestrant treatment combinations in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS17-07.

1061 Background: Limitations of current approved endocrine therapies (ETs), a mainstay tx for ER+ BC, include incomplete ER signaling inhibition. Novel ETs, such as selective estrogen receptor antagonists and degraders (SERDs), may help overcome this. G, a potent, nonsteroidal, oral (PO) SERD, is well tolerated and has shown robust ER occupancy and encouraging antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) palbociclib (P). MORPHEUS BC (NCT04802759) is evaluating the safety and efficacy of G tx combinations in ER+, HER2– LA/mBC. We present results from the 16-week IA of G and G + CDK4/6i (A or R). Methods: Eligible pts had disease progression on 1–2 lines of ET (including a CDK4/6i) for LA/mBC. Pts were randomized 1:6 (planned n = 15 per arm) to receive G (30 mg PO QD; control arm), G + A (150 mg PO BID), or sequentially, G + R (600 mg PO QD) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The study was not designed to make explicit power and type I error considerations for a hypothesis test. Primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate; other endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, and pharmacokinetics. Genetic alterations were defined using baseline circulating tumor DNA. Results: As of Feb 4, 2022, 15 pts were enrolled in the G + A arm; 73% received one prior line of tx in the LA/mBC setting; 27% received prior fulvestrant; 73% had liver metastases at baseline (BL). As of Sept 22, 2022, 11 and 16 (of whom 14 were evaluable) pts were enrolled in the G and G + R arms, respectively; 64%/86% received one prior line of tx in the LA/mBC setting; 73%/36% received prior fulvestrant; 73%/57% had liver metastases at BL. Three pts had a partial response (PR; G + A, n = 1; G + R, n = 2); 19 had stable disease (G, n = 5; G + A, n = 7; G + R, n = 7). DCRs were 36% (G), 40% (G + A), and 50% (G + R). Safety is shown. Conclusions: G combined with a CDK4/6i (A or R) was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals. Three PRs were seen in this heavily pretreated population of pts with disease progression post-CDK4/6i tx. This study provides the first data supporting the combinability of G with the CDK4/6is A and R, in addition to P as seen in prior studies. G can therefore be combined with all three approved CDK4/6is. Clinical trial information: NCT04802759 . [Table: see text]

Objective: To develop an injectable dosage form of the daily oral HIV drugs, tenofovir (T), lamivudine (L), and dolutegravir (D), creating a single, complete, all-in-one TLD 3-drug-combination that demonstrates long-acting pharmacokinetics.Design: Using drug-combination-nanoparticle (DcNP) technology to stabilize multiple HIV drugs, the 3-HIV drugs TLD, with disparate physical-chemical properties, are stabilized and assembled with lipid-excipients to form TLD-in-DcNP. TLD-in-DcNP is verified to be stable and suitable for subcutaneous administration. To characterize the plasma time-courses and PBMC concentrations for all 3 drugs, single subcutaneous injections of TLD-in-DcNP were given to nonhuman primates (NHP, M. nemestrina).Results: Following single-dose TLD-in-DcNP, all drugs exhibited long-acting profiles in NHP plasma with levels that persisted for 4 weeks above predicted viral-effective concentrations for TLD in combination. Times-to-peak were within 24 hr in all NHP for all drugs. Compared to a free-soluble TLD, TLD-in-DcNP provided exposure enhancement and extended duration 7.0-, 2.1-, and 20-fold as AUC boost and 10-, 8.3-, and 5.9-fold as half-life extension. Additionally, DcNP may provide more drug exposure in cells than plasma with PBMC-to-plasma drug ratios exceeding one, suggesting cell-targeted drug-combination delivery.Conclusions: This study confirms that TLD with disparate properties can be made stable by DcNP to enable TLD concentrations of 4 weeks in NHP. Study results highlighted the potential of TLD-in-DcNP as a convenient all-in-one, complete HIV long-acting product for clinical development.

AbstractPurpose: GDC-0927 is a novel, potent, nonsteroidal, orally bioavailable, selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader that induces tumor regression in ER+ breast cancer xenograft models. Patients and Methods: This phase I dose-escalation multicenter study enrolled postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase II dose of GDC-0927. Pharmacodynamics was assessed with [18F]-fluoroestradiol (FES) PET scans. Results: Forty-two patients received GDC-0927 once daily. The MTD was not reached. The most common adverse events (AE) regardless of causality were nausea, constipation, diarrhea, arthralgia, fatigue, hot flush, back pain, and vomiting. There were no deaths, grade 4/5 AEs, or treatment-related serious AEs. Two patients experienced grade 2 AEs of special interest of deep vein thrombosis and jugular vein thrombosis, both considered unrelated to GDC-0927. Following dosing, approximately 1.6-fold accumulation was observed, consistent with the observed half-life and dosing frequency. There were no complete or partial responses. Pharmacodynamics was supported by >90% reduction in FES uptake and an approximately 40% reduction in ER expression, suggesting ER degradation is not the mechanistic driver of ER antagonism. Twelve patients (29%) achieved clinical benefit; 17 patients (41%) showed a confirmed best overall response of stable disease. Baseline levels of ER and progesterone receptor protein and mutant ESR1 circulating tumor DNA did not correlate with clinical benefit. Conclusions: GDC-0927 appeared to be well tolerated with pharmacokinetics supporting once-daily dosing. There was evidence of target engagement and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic ER+/HER2− breast cancer with and without ESR1 mutations.