Research on Chicago school improvement indicates that improving elementary schools requires coherent, orchestrated action across five essential supports.
iven the many challenges facing educa tion, it is natural to look to our na tion's research and development ca pacity to point the way. Even at its best, however, extant education re search today only weakly informs the complex processes involved in improv ing teaching and learning. We simply lack the necessary infrastructure to guide the transfor mations we need. This isn't due to an absence of activity. An indus try of education researchers is -identifying problems and developing new concepts. Individual educators regularly experiment with new practices in their class rooms, and school districts are constantly introducing new programs. Individual consultants and commer cial firms market new services, as state and federal policies incentivize new activity, and foundations pro mote bold new solutions seeking to reinvent the in stitutional enterprise. In short, an impressive array of individual projects focuses on many different issues. Taken as a whole, however, this enterprise isn't leading to solutions for major educational problems. We must reengineer both how we carry out education R&D and the institutional environments in which this work occurs if we want to achieve more produc tive ends. Something new and quite different must emerge if we are to confront educational challenges successfully.
No AccessVorgeschichte und bisherige Ergebnisse der Schulrefom in ChicagoPenny Bender Sebring, Anthony BrykPenny Bender Sebring, Anthony BrykPublished Online:Jan 2019https://doi.org/10.7788/bue-1997-jg14SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail About Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Download book cover ISSN: eISSN: HistoryPublished online:January 2019 PDF download
AbstractAlthough for many thoughtful observers recent experiences with evaluating the impact of programs have proved disappointing, there is considerable disagreement on both what constitutes the problem and what represents a solution.
Barbara Schneider合作论文数Department of Sociology, College of Social Science, Michigan State University;College of Education, Michigan State University;The University of Chicago3
todd rosenkranz合作论文数1george p shultz合作论文数1henry s rowen合作论文数1Robert B. Chess合作论文数1guy scott bristol合作论文数1charles a holloway合作论文数1mark leslie合作论文数1
Jared Randall Curtis合作论文数Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington1
Daniel P. Kessler合作论文数School of Business, Stanford University1
David Bruce Montgomery合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Deborah H. Gruenfeld合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Charles A. O’Reilly合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
George Foster合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Paul R. Milgrom合作论文数Department of Economics, Stanford University;Stanford Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Alan M. Garber合作论文数Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School;Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School1
Jim Coleman合作论文数Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Greensboro1
Haim Mendelson合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Dale T. Miller合作论文数School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University;Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
David P. Baron合作论文数Stanford Graduate School of Business/Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University1
Hau L. Lee合作论文数Department of Management Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University;Stanford Institute for Innovations in Developing Economies, Stanford University1
Stephen Raudenbush合作论文数Department of Sociology, The University of Chicago;Harris School of Public Policy, The University of Chicago1
Paul Yock合作论文数Byers Center for Biodesign, Stanford University;Second Harvest of Silicon Valley;VentureWell1
John Roberts合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Tim Bresnahan合作论文数Department of Economics, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University1
Peter C. Wendell合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Roderick M. Kramer合作论文数Department of Organizational Behavior, Stanford Graduate School of Business1
James R. Miller合作论文数Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey1
H. Irving Grousbeck合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1Carl S. Spetzler合作论文数1
Michael T. Hannan合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
David L. Bradford合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Jonathan Bendor合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Steven R. Grenadier合作论文数Department of Financial Economics, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
John A. Ferejohn合作论文数School of Law, New York University1
Kenneth J. Singleton合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Christophe Crombez合作论文数Department of Applied Economics;University of Leuven;Department of Applied Economics, University of Leuven1Dennis M. Rohan合作论文数1Robert B. Wilson合作论文数Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center1Karen A. Wilson合作论文数1
Anat R. Admati合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Laurence Franklin合作论文数Business School,Department of Finance, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology1
William P. Barnett合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
James Gardner March合作论文数Stanford University1Gayton E. Germane合作论文数1
Mark Wolfson合作论文数Jasper Ridge Partners;National Bureau of Economic Research1
Douglas Abbey合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
James M. Patell合作论文数Graduate School of Business, Stanford University1
Warren Hausman合作论文数Management Science & Engineering Department, Stanford University1
