Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies rely on neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-mediated recycling and transcytosis for prolonged serum half-life and tissue distribution. However, high antigen loads during infection may alter FcRn-mediated trafficking, impacting therapeutic efficacy. This study investigates how cognate antigen binding influences FcRn-mediated transport of two SARS-CoV-2-specific (SCoV-2) monoclonal antibodies: Sotrovimab, an Fc-engineered antibody with enhanced FcRn affinity, and B38, a non-engineered comparator. We evaluated antibody binding using ELISA and bio-layer interferometry (BLI) and assessed FcRn-mediated transport through transcytosis and recycling assays in MDCK cells expressing human FcRn. Experiments were conducted with and without SCoV-2 wild-type (WT) spike protein (SP) at a 1:1 molar ratio. Sotrovimab demonstrated superior binding affinity to both SCoV-2 WT SP and FcRn, exhibiting greater baseline transcytosis and recycling efficiency. However, antigen presence significantly reduced transcytosis for both antibodies, with Sotrovimab showing a more pronounced decrease (46.7% vs. 23% for B38). Recycling responses also diverged: Sotrovimab showed a modest, non-significant decrease while recycling of B38 significantly increased. Kinetic analysis revealed antigen binding altered FcRn interactions differently. The higher binding affinity of Sotrovimab was due to reduced dissociation at neutral pH, potentially trapping complexes intracellularly. B38 showed faster association at pH 6.0 without compromised dissociation. These data suggest that cognate antigen binding and interaction of immune complexes (ICs) with FcRn, play a major role in influencing transcytosis and recycling of mAb. These findings emphasize the complex interplay between antigen binding and FcRn function, with implications for antibody dosing strategies during infection to optimize tissue distribution and efficacy.

Recombinant Factor VIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) is an enhanced half-life therapeutic protein product used for the management of hemophilia A. Recent studies have demonstrated that rFVIIIFc interacts with Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) resulting in the activation or inhibition of various FcγR-expressing immune cells. We previously demonstrated that rFVIIIFc, unlike recombinant Factor IX-Fc (rFIXFc), activates natural killer (NK) cells via Fc-mediated interactions with FcγRIIIA (CD16). Additionally, we showed that rFVIIIFc activated CD16+ NK cells to lyse a FVIII-specific B cell clone. Here, we used human NK cell lines and primary NK cells enriched from peripheral blood leukocytes to study the role of the FVIII moiety in rFVIIIFc-mediated NK cell activation. Following overnight incubation of NK cells with rFVIIIFc, cellular activation was assessed by measuring secretion of the inflammatory cytokine IFNγ by ELISA or by cellular degranulation. We show that anti-FVIII, anti-Fc, and anti-CD16 all inhibited indicating that these molecules were involved in rFVIIIFc-mediated NK cell activation. To define which domains of FVIII were involved, we used antibodies that are FVIII domain-specific and demonstrated that blocking FVIII C1 or C2 domain-mediated membrane binding potently inhibited rFVIIIFc-mediated CD16+ NK cell activation, while targeting the FVIII heavy chain domains did not. We also show that rFVIIIFc binds CD16 with about five-fold higher affinity than rFIXFc. Based on our results we propose that FVIII light chain-mediated membrane binding results in tethering of the fusion protein to the cell surface, and this, together with increased binding affinity for CD16, allows for Fc-CD16 interactions to proceed, resulting in NK cellular activation. Our working model may explain our previous results where we observed that rFVIIIFc activated NK cells via CD16, whereas rFIXFc did not despite having identical IgG1 Fc domains.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is usually associated with a rapid ventricular response (1). In this case, four periods of 14-day continuous monitoring (Zio patch, I-Rhythm, San Francisco, CA) revealed sinus bradycardia, paroxysmal AF (PAF) with a slow ventricular response, and occasional tachycardia. There was evidence of (i) first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block (prolonged P-R interval) and (ii) second-degree AV block (Mobitz type I or Wenckebach). The association between sinus bradycardia and AF is well known, the Tachy-Brady Syndrome (2).

Recombinant Factor VIII-Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) is an enhanced half-life therapeutic protein product used for the management of hemophilia A. Recent studies have demonstrated that rFVIIIFc interacts with multiple Fc gamma receptors (FcγR) resulting in the activation or inhibition of a wide variety of FcγR expressing immune cells. We demonstrated that rFVIIIFc activates natural killer (NK) cells via Fc mediated interactions with FcγRIIIA or CD16. Here, we used human NK cell lines and primary NK cells enriched from peripheral blood leukocytes to study rFVIIIFc-mediated NK cell activation. Following overnight incubation of NK cells with rFVIIIFc, we assessed cellular activation by measuring inflammatory cytokine secretion (IFNγ by ELISA) or cellular degranulation (flow cytometry-based surface LAMP1/CD107a). In some cases, we introduced specific blocking molecules (anti-FVIII, anti-Fc, or anti-CD16) into our assays to act as inhibitors of NK cell activation. We identified the FVIII light chain as playing a key role in the activation of CD16 +NK cells by rFVIIIFc. Using FVIII domain-specific inhibitors, we demonstrate that blocking C1 or C2 domain-mediated membrane binding potently inhibits rFVIIIFc-mediated CD16 +NK cell activation, while targeting FVIII heavy chain domains does not. Our results suggest FVIII light chain-mediated membrane binding results in tethering of the fusion protein to the cell surface and allows for Fc-CD16 interactions to proceed, resulting in NK cellular activation. This working model may help explain our previous results where we observed recombinant Factor IX-Fc fusion protein and rFVIIIFc exhibited different CD16-signaling properties despite having identical IgG1 Fc domains.

The current dosing strategy of immune globulin products for the treatment of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs) in the USA is based on total body weight (BW). The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between dose and trough level, and to determine whether an alternative dosing strategy should be considered for patients who are overweight or obese. We analyzed data in a total of 533 patients from 11 studies. We modeled the relationship between trough level and dose per week using a linear mixed model. We used an over-dispersed Poisson model to model the relationship between infection and trough level. In these analyses, we then combined the study-specific treatment effects using a random-effect or fixed-effect model. The mean administered dose per week was 9.77, 14.00, or 18.17 g in patients who were normal weight, overweight, or obese, respectively. Compared with a patient of normal weight, a 1 g increase in dose per week in a patient who was overweight was associated with a smaller increase in the trough level, 0.08 g/L less (95%CI -0.14 to -0.03 g/L), and a 1 g increase in dose per week in a patient who was obese was associated with a much smaller increase in trough level, 0.01 g/L less (95% CI -0.07 to 0.06 g/L). Last, for a 1 unit (g/L) increase in trough level, the expected number of infections remained the same, with a multiplicative factor of 1.01 (95%CI 0.98-1.04). Overall, we found no compelling evidence to justify a reconsideration of the current dosing strategy based on total BW for patients with PIDDs who are overweight or obese.

Immunogenicity affects the safety and efficacy of therapeutic proteins. This review is focused on approaches for inducing immunological tolerance to circumvent the immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins in the clinic. The few immune tolerance strategies that are used in the clinic tend to be inefficient and expensive and typically involve global immunosuppression, putting patients at risk of infections. The hallmark of a desirable immune tolerance regimen is the specific alleviation of immune responses to the therapeutic protein. In the past decade, proof-of-principle studies have demonstrated that emerging technologies, including nanoparticle-based delivery of immunomodulators, cellular targeting and depletion, cellular engineering, gene therapy, and gene editing, can be leveraged to promote tolerance to therapeutic proteins. We discuss the potential of these novel approaches and the barriers that need to be overcome for translation into the clinic.

The emergence of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus is the most important public-health issue of our time. Understanding the diverse clinical presentations of the ensuing disease, COVID-19, remains a critical unmet need. Here we present a comprehensive listing of the diverse clinical indications associated with COVID-19. We explore the theory that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could cross-react with endogenous human proteins driving some of the pathologies associated with COVID-19. We describe a novel computational approach to estimate structural homology between SARS-CoV-2 proteins and human proteins. Antibodies are more likely to interrogate 3D-structural epitopes than continuous linear epitopes. This computational workflow identified 346 human proteins containing a domain with high structural homology to a SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain protein. Of these, 102 proteins exhibit functions that could contribute to COVID-19 clinical pathologies. We present a testable hypothesis to delineate unexplained clinical observations vis-à-vis COVID-19 and a tool to evaluate the safety-risk profile of potential COVID-19 therapies.

ABSTRACTHyperimmune immunoglobulin (hCoV-2IG) preparations generated from SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma (CP) are under evaluation in several clinical trials of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Here we explored the antibody epitope repertoire, antibody binding and virus neutralizing capacity of six hCoV-2IG batches as well as nine convalescent plasma (CP) lots against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants of concern (VOC). The Gene-Fragment Phage display library spanning the SARS-CoV-2 spike demonstrated broad recognition of multiple antigenic sites spanning the entire spike including NTD, RBD, S1/S2 cleavage site, S2-fusion peptide and S2-heptad repeat regions. Antibody binding to the immunodominant epitopes was higher for hCoV-2IG than CP, with predominant binding to the fusion peptide. In the pseudovirus neutralization assay (PsVNA) and in the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 PRNT assay, hCoV-2IG lots showed higher titers against the WA-1 strain compared with CP. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs from around the globe were reduced to different levels by hCoV-2IG lots. The most significant loss of neutralizing activity was seen against the B.1.351 (9-fold) followed by P.1 (3.5-fold), with minimal loss of activity against the B.1.17 and B.1.429 (≤2-fold). Again, the CP showed more pronounced loss of cross-neutralization against the VOCs compared with hCoV-2IG. Significant reduction of hCoV-2IG binding was observed to the RBD-E484K followed by RBD-N501Y and minimal loss of binding to RBD-K417N compared with unmutated RBD. This study suggests that post-exposure treatment with hCoV-2IG is preferable to CP. In countries with co-circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, identifying the infecting virus strain could inform optimal treatments, but would likely require administration of higher volumes or repeated infusions of hCOV-2IG or CP, in patients infected with the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Hyperimmune immunoglobulin (hCoV-2IG) preparations generated from SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma (CP) are under evaluation in several clinical trials of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Here we explored the antibody epitope repertoire, antibody binding and virus neutralizing capacity of six hCoV-2IG batches as well as nine convalescent plasma (CP) lots against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants of concern (VOC). The Gene-Fragment Phage display library spanning the SARS-CoV-2 spike-based epitope-mapping demonstrated broad recognition of multiple antigenic sites spanning the entire spike including NTD, RBD, S1/S2 cleavage site, S2-fusion peptide and S2-heptad repeat regions. Antibody binding to the immunodominant epitopes was higher for hCoV-2IG than CP, with predominant binding to the fusion peptide. In the pseudovirus neutralization assay (PsVNA) and in the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 PRNT assay, hCoV-2IG lots showed higher titers against the WA-1 strain compared with CP. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs from around the globe were reduced to a different extent by hCoV-2IG lots. The most significant loss of neutralizing activity was seen against the B.1.351 (9-fold) followed by P.1 (3.5-fold), with minimal loss of activity against the B.1.17 and B.1.429 ( < 2-fold). Again, the CP showed more pronounced loss of cross-neutralization against the VOCs compared with hCoV-2IG. Significant reduction of hCoV-2IG binding was observed to the RBD-E484K followed by RBD-N501Y and minimal loss of binding to RBD-K417N compared with unmutated RBD. This study suggests that post-exposure treatment with hCoV-2IG is preferable to CP. In countries with co-circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, identifying the infecting virus strain could inform optimal treatments, but would likely require administration of higher doses achieved by larger volumes or repeated infusions of hCOV-2IG or CP, in patients infected with the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.Funding: The research work described in this manuscript was supported by FDA Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMi) grant # OCET 2021-1565 and NIH-NIAID IAA #AAI20040. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Declaration of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.Ethical Approval: This study was approved by Food and Drug Administration's Research Involving Human Subjects Committee (RIHSC #2020-04-02). This study complied with all relevant ethical regulations for work with human participants, and informed consent was obtained. Samples were collected from patients who provided informed consent to participate in the study.

*All p values were calculated from a Fisher’s exact test unless otherwise indicated. †Ttest was used. ‡Roche Elecsys AntiSARSCoV-2, specificity 99.8% sensitivity 99.5%, or a Siemens Healthineers SARSCoV-2 total (COV2T) Assay Atellica IM, specificity 99.82% sensitivity 100% or ADVIA Centaur XP/XPT, specificity 99.81% sensitivity 100%. §Among the four people who were negative, the specific number of days from last infusion to first vaccination were 188, 229, 230, 415. ¶Medications are not mutually exclusive. 35 (39%) patients are taking two or more medications. **Includes both conventional and targeted synthetics. ††Wilcoxon rank sum test was used. DMARDS, disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. Table 1 Continued

New modified coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) products have been designed to improve the treatment of individuals with hemophilia A and B by increasing the interval between dosing. Although these FVIII and FIX molecules have been structurally modified to improve the circulation time, the changes have also influenced their behavior in functional assays in comparison with traditional plasma‐derived or recombinant coagulation factors. The assignment of potencies for these products can be problematic because discordance in factor activity values between the commonly used one‐stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assays is often observed. Discrepancies in potency assay values also exist when different assay kits and reagents are used in the same assay type. Ideally, all FVIII and FIX products should be calibrated against the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standards (IS) because the assignment of potencies in international units (IU) helps maintain treatment tradition and meaningful references for manufacturers, patients, and clinicians. The discrepant measurements, attributed to the modified structural and functional properties of these products, are manifested in their lack of commutability with the WHO IS for FVIII or FIX. Herein, we discuss the considerations upon which an assay is chosen for potency assignment and postadministration monitoring of a new factor product, which include the validity of the assay calibrated with the IS, the meaning of the potency values in IU, standards of care for patients, clinical relevance between the assigned potency value and recovery value from clinical laboratories, and patient safety.

Background After the failure of antibody therapies in treating hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we investigated the impact of viral replication on the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a hyperimmune severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunoglobulin (CoVIG) product in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection using an adult Syrian hamster model. Methods The CoVIG was manufactured from plasma donors who had recovered from COVID-19. The dose used (400 mg/kg) was based on the dose given in clinical trials to hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Hamsters were given a single dose of CoVIG 2 days after challenge with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (isolate NY/PV08410/2020), followed by sampling of blood, nasal, tracheal, and lung tissues at different time points. The blood samples were assayed for anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike binding and used to calculate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Nasal wash, tracheal, and lung tissue samples were assayed for viral replication by polymerase chain reaction (subgenomic messenger RNA). Results CoVIG-treated hamsters showed a reduction in viral replication in the lower respiratory tract, but minimal reduction in the upper respiratory tract, after challenge with SARS-CoV-2. Challenge resulted in altered PK parameters proportionate to viral replication, resulting in decreased area under the curve, accelerated clearance, and shorter half-life of CoVIG. Conclusions These data indicate that in the presence of actively replicating SARS-CoV-2 virus, PK parameters are altered and should trigger an adjustment in CoVIG dosing. In a hamster model of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), hyperimmunoglobulin pharmacokinetics was altered depending on viral load, possibly explaining why antibodies were ineffective in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, suggesting that dosing should be adjusted according to viral load.

The most challenging complication associated with Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is the development of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies, or inhibitors, which occur in 23-35% of severe (FVIII level <1%) hemophilia A (HA) patients and are a serious hindrance to effective management of HA. Consequently, strategies that can either prevent anti-FVIII inhibitors from developing or "tolerize" individuals who develop such antibodies represent a clinically important unmet need. One intervention for patients with high-titer inhibitors is immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy. Although ITI therapy is the only clinically proven strategy to eradicate anti-FVIII inhibitors, mechanisms of inhibitor reduction remain unknown. Factor VIII Fc-fusion (rFVIIIFc) is an enhanced half-life antihemophilic factor used in replacement therapy for HA. Fc-fusion is a successful protein bio-engineering platform technology. In addition to enhancement of plasma half-life via neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) binding, other Fc-mediated interactions, including engagement with Fc gamma receptors (FcγR), may have immunological consequences. Several case reports and retrospective analyses suggest that rFVIIIFc offers superior outcomes with respect to ITI compared to other FVIII products. Previously we and others demonstrated rFVIIIFc interactions with activating FcγRIIIA/CD16. Here, we investigated if rFVIIIFc activates natural killer (NK) cells via CD16. We demonstrated rFVIIIFc signaling via CD16 independent of Von Willebrand Factor (VWF):FVIII complex formation. We established that rFVIIIFc potently activated NK cells in a CD16-dependent fashion resulting in IFNγ secretion and cytolytic perforin and granzyme B release. We also demonstrated an association between rFVIIIFc-mediated NK cell IFNγ secretion levels and the high-affinity (158V) CD16 genotype. Furthermore, we show that rFVIIIFc-activated CD16+ NK cells were able to lyse a B-cell clone (BO2C11) bearing an anti-FVIII B-cell receptor in an antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay. These in vitro findings provide an underlying molecular mechanism that may help explain clinical case reports and retrospective studies suggesting rFVIIIFc may be more effective in tolerizing HA patients with anti-FVIII inhibitors compared to FVIII not linked to Fc. Our in vitro findings suggest a potential use of Fc-fusion proteins acting via NK cells to target antigen-specific B-cells, in the management of unwanted immune responses directed against immunogenic self-antigens or therapeutic protein products.

Hyperimmune immunoglobulin (hCoV-2IG) generated from SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma (CP) are under evaluation in clinical trials. Here we explored the antibody epitope repertoire, and virus neutralizing capacity of six hCoV-2IG batches as well as nine CP against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants of concern (VOCs). Epitope-mapping by gene-fragment phage display library spanning the SARS-CoV-2 spike demonstrated broad recognition of multiple antigenic sites spanning the entire spike that was higher for hCoV-2IG than CP, with predominant binding to the fusion peptide. In the pseudovirus neutralization assay and in the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 PRNT assay, hCoV-2IG lots showed higher titers against the WA-1 strain compared with CP. Neutralization of VOCs were reduced to different extent by hCoV-2IG lots but were higher than CP. Significant reduction of hCoV-2IG binding was observed to RBD-E484K followed by RBD-N501Y (but not RBD-K417N). This study suggests that post-exposure treatment with hCoV-2IG could be preferable to CP.

At present, no cure is available for COVID-19 but vaccines, antiviral drugs, immunoglobulins, or the combination of immunoglobulins with antiviral drugs have been suggested and are in clinical trials. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the role of a pharmacokinetic and viral load analysis as a basis for adjusting immunoglobulin dosing to treat COVID-19. We reviewed the pre-clinical and clinical literature that describes the impact of a high antigen load on pharmacokinetic data following antibody treatment. Representative examples are provided to illustrate the effect of high viral and tumor loads on antibody clearance. We then highlight the implications of these factors for facilitating the development and dosing of hyperimmune anti-SARS CoV2 immunoglobulin. Both nonclinical and clinical examples indicate that high antigen loads, whether they be viral, bacterial, or tumoral in origin, result in increased clearance and decreased area under the curve and half-life of antibodies. A dosing strategy that matches the antigen load can be achieved by giving initially high doses and adjusting the frequency of dosing intervals based on pharmacokinetic parameters. We suggest that study design and dose selection for immunoglobulin products for the treatment of COVID-19 require special considerations such as viral load, antibody-virus interaction, and dosing adjustment based on the pharmacokinetics of the antibody.

Immunoglobulins (IGs) are widely used for the treatment of immunodeficiency syndromes and several autoimmune diseases. In neonates, IGs have been used for the treatment of alloimmune thrombocytopenia, in neonatal infections and in the rare cases of neonatal Kawasaki disease. This review aims to examine the various dosing regimens of IGs following intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) administration, pharmacokinetics (PK) of IGs, and the importance of trough values for the prevention of infections in patients with primary immune deficiency (PID). The review also focuses on the mechanism of catabolism of IGs and the impact on the half-life of IGs. Data and reviews were obtained from the literature and the FDA package inserts. The authors suggest that for dosing, the PK of IGs should be evaluated on the baseline-corrected concentrations since this approach provides an accurate estimate of half-life and clearance of IGs. We also suggest employing clearance as a primary PK parameter for dosing determination of IGs. We suggest that IV dosing would be more effective if given more frequently to adjust for the increased clearance at high doses and because the baseline-corrected half-life is much shorter than the baseline-uncorrected half-life. Regarding SC administration, the dose should be adjusted based on the absolute bioavailability (determined against IV dosing) of the product. Finally, we highlight clinical and PK data gaps for optimum and individualized dosing of IGs.

BACKGROUND:Immunoglobulins are widely used across multiple therapeutic areas such as immunodeficiency syndromes, infection and autoimmune diseases. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of immunoglobulins are well characterized in adults, but very little is known about the PK of immunoglobulins in neonates and infants. OBJECTIVE:The objective of the present study was to characterize the PK of Gammagard, an immunoglobulin, in very low birth weight preterm neonates. METHOD:Gammagard concentration-time data from very low birth weight neonates (bodyweight range 0.78-1.38 kg, n = 20) following intravenous administration of 500 mg/kg and 750 mg/kg were obtained from the literature. The data were analyzed with and without baseline correction using extensive blood samples (8 blood samples). Model-independent (non-compartmental) analysis was used to characterize the PK of Gammagard. RESULTS:Based on uncorrected baseline concentration-time data, the clearance and half-life of Gammagard were 3.1 ± 0.7 mL/day and 22 ± 6 days, respectively. Based on corrected baseline concentration-time data, the clearance and half-life of Gammagard were 20.2 ± 7.4 mL/day and 5.3 ± 2.2 days, respectively. CONCLUSION:The dose of immunoglobulins should be adjusted based on the PK of baseline corrected rather than baseline uncorrected profiles because baseline corrected PK parameters especially half-life reconciles with PK principles.

Fusing the human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) constant region (Fc-domain) to therapeutic proteins or peptides increases their circulating plasma half-life via neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) binding and recycling. However, Fc-mediated interactions with other molecules including complement C1q and Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs) can have immunological consequences and the potential to modulate the immunogenicity of Fc-fusion therapeutics. In a comparative study, we carried out a comprehensive assessment of Fc-mediated interactions for five FDA-approved Fc-fusion therapeutics. C1q binding and complement activation were measured by ELISA, while FcγR binding and signaling were evaluated using BW5147:FcγR-ζ reporter cell lines. We demonstrate that FIX-Fc and FVIII-Fc bound C1q as well as activating and inhibitory FcγRs (I, IIA, IIB, IIIA). These coagulation factor Fc-fusions also signaled via FcγRIIIA, and to a lesser extent via FcγRI and FcγRIIB. TNFR-Fc and CTLA4-Fc bound FcγRI, while TNFR-Fc also bound FcγRIIIA, but these interactions did not result in FcγR signaling. Our comprehensive assessment demonstrates that (i) different Fc-fusion drugs have distinct C1q/FcγR binding and signaling properties, (ii) FcγR binding does not predict signaling, and (iii) the fusion partner (effector molecule) can influence Fc-mediated interactions.

Therapeutic proteins provide interventions for some of the most complex and intractable diseases and are an essential part of modern medicine. Immunogenicity is the development of immune responses, usually measured by antibodies, to therapeutic proteins. These responses can adversely affect the safety and efficacy of the therapeutic agent and may have the following consequences: neutralization of a life-saving biotherapeutic, crossreactivity to non-redundant endogenous proteins, and hypersensitivity responses. These concerns have been underscored by the discontinuation of development of several drugs in recent years owing to immunogenicity issues. We review here recent progress in technological approaches that are useful for the clinical and non-clinical risk assessment of immunogenicity as well as mitigation strategies including deimmunizing protein molecules and inducing immune tolerance to the therapeutic protein.