The time has come for health care organizations, practitioners, and patients to unite behind a clear, compelling message of healing as the organizing principle of our health care system, and take concrete steps to make that message routine in everyday practice. To achieve this vision, we propose the following Action Steps to all organizations committed to making whole person care a powerful force in American health care: 1. Include Whole Health or Whole Person Health Care in the mission and vision statements of our organizations 2. Ground collaboration in the NASEM definitions of Whole Health and Whole-Health Care, embracing it as the shared vision and unifying concept that unites all of our organizations (as AAFP did in the fall 2025 convening) 3. Hold interdisciplinary and inter-organization conversations and convenings to develop a shared set of tools for communicating this vision to patients, payers, and policymakers. 4. Encourage professional organizations to develop resources tailored to their members; recent examples include the development at AAFP of a Whole Health Practice Playbook and Practice Improvement continuing medical education (CME) activities and the publication by the American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine of a special issue focused on meaning and purpose.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and other health care systems have been moving to patient-centered health care models with a focus on individual goal setting and patient engagement. In VHA, this model of care is called Whole Health, implementation of which began in 2011. To examine whether Whole Health utilization is associated with subsequent improvements in clinical quality measures of chronic disease management and preventive health care services. Controlled pre/post quality improvement evaluation accounting for secular trends. Veterans at 125 VHA medical centers who utilized care between 10/01/2022 and 03/31/2023. Veterans with Whole Health utilization that included Whole Health educational classes, coaching activities, and Whole Health clinical care conversations with providers were assessed alongside reference patients who used general VHA care during the same period. Change in clinical quality measures one month before using Whole Health care to 6 months after. The population included 548,968 Whole Health users and 5,428,413 general VHA users. Improvements were observed in all nine clinical quality measures following Whole Health utilization and continued to improve over 6 months. The proportions of Whole Health cohorts with quality improvements were greater than the reference cohorts over the same period. For example, among patients with diabetes, 80.1

Objective:Embedded research partnerships can advance the implementation of evidence-based policies and practices, including those aligned with person-centered care. Care delivery model transformations, such as the VA's person-centered Whole Health System (WHS), can benefit from an ongoing cycle of program implementation and their evaluation to inform future evolution. This paper describes how embedded researchers partnered with policy makers leading VA's WHS transformation to support its development, implementation, and scaling to illustrate lessons learned for embedded research. Data Sources and Study Setting:Fifty-eight embedded research projects were conducted from FY2013 to FY2024. Study Design:We recorded each project's scope, methodology, results, products, and impact. Through a group reflection process, we identified common cross-project lessons that fostered this successful embedded research partnership. Finally, we mapped projects to phases of Kilbourne's Knowledge to Action Framework (Pre-Implementation, Implementation, and Sustainment) to demonstrate how embedded researchers defined evaluation questions, evaluated WHS transformation, and assessed outcomes to inform the implementation and sustainment of VA's WHS transformation. Data Collection/Extraction Methods:Projects used multiple qualitative, survey, and large database methods. Principal Findings:Across 58 projects, 380 discrete products were used by our operational partner to refine the WHS model, improve implementation support, scale effective practices, inform new policy, and sustain transformation. Three practices cut across these projects to contribute to our successful embedded research partnership: agility, collaboration, and continuous learning and improvement. Additionally, the purpose, questions, and methods of embedded research projects varied as operational partner activities moved across pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainment phases, iteratively impacting WHS transformation. Conclusions:Embedded research can transform a healthcare system through the timely translation of data into practice, enabling evidence-based policy and practice decisions. Our embedded research-operations partnership, characterized by trust, respect, and strong communication, ensured that evaluations generated an evidence base to inform both implementation and impact.

BACKGROUND:Health care systems and insurers are expanding coverage for practitioner-delivered and self-care complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies for chronic pain. OBJECTIVES:To determine if combining practitioner-delivered and self-care CIH therapies (PD/SC-CIH) improves pain outcomes more than practitioner-delivered CIH (PD-CIH) therapies alone. RESEARCH DESIGN:Pragmatic nonrandomized trial. Structural nudges and the availability of CIH therapies were used as a surrogate to randomization. SUBJECTS:Of 3306 veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain at 18 medical centers in the Veterans Health Administration between March 2021 and March 2023. MEASURES:PD-CIH therapies included acupuncture, chiropractic care, or massage therapy. Participants in the PD/SC-CIH arm also received yoga, mindfulness/meditation, and/or Tai Chi/Qigong. The primary outcome was the change in pain-related functional interference at 6 months. RESULTS:Pain interference improved in both arms (-0.62 and -0.70), with 39.5% and 41.1%, respectively, achieving clinically meaningful improvement with no difference between arms in improvement in pain interference: -0.12 (-0.28 to 0.05). At 6 months, more participants in the PD/SC-CIH arm reported their use of CIH therapies specifically led to perceived improvements across 4 global patient-centered measures: pain (11%; 5%-18%); fatigue (28%; 17%-40%); mental health (24%; 14%-35%); and overall well-being (27%; 18%-35%). CONCLUSIONS:Both approaches to offering CIH therapies were equally associated with improvements in pain interference among this large cohort with real-world CIH therapy engagement. More patients in the PD/SC-CIH arm perceived that their use of CIH therapies improved multiple health dimensions. Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain should be encouraged to add self-care CIH therapies and health care systems should expand their availability. STUDY REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05097521.

Background: An increasing number of clinics are providing integrative medicine for chronic pain, creating a need for real-world, practice-based research. Our purpose was to conduct a multi-site prospective, practice-based, observational evaluation of patient reported outcomes in chronic pain patients. Methods: This study took place at seventeen BraveNet Practice Based Research Network integrative medicine clinics. Chronic pain patients receiving personalized, integrative medicine interventions at BraveNet clinics were eligible. Participants completed the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29, Perceived Stress Scale-4, and the Patient Activation Measure at the index/baseline visit and at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months. Diagnostic and billing codes were extracted data from patients’ health records. Linear mixed-model and multi-variate analyses evaluated changes from index visit through 12 months. Results: A total of 4883 patients enrolled, 3658 qualified and 967 of them endorsed chronic pain, completed at least two outcomes at 2 time points, had evaluable electronic health record data, and had at least one integrative medicine visit during the study period. Participants had a mean age of 51.6 years (SD 13.88) and were mostly white (81.8 %), female (78.3 %), educated (≥ college degree: 70.1 %). Significant improvements were observed on all 7 Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System subscales, Perceived Stress Scale, and Patient Activation Measure scores at 12 months. Conclusions: Chronic pain patients receiving care at integrative medicine clinics reported significant improvement over time in multiple domains of pain and quality of life. Future research with more sites and a common set of outcomes would further guide clinical practice. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01754038

Background:The integrative medicine (IM) clinic is an innovative care model that may increase access to guideline-concordant nonpharmacologic treatment use in healthcare delivery systems for prevalent conditions such as low back pain (LBP). Objective:To describe the use and effectiveness of IM services for LBP in IM clinics. Research Design:Prospective cohort study. Subjects:Adult patients with LBP enrolled at seventeen IM clinics. Measures:Patterns of IM service use were assessed over 12 months. Changes in clinical outcomes were assessed between index visit and 12-month follow-up using linear mixed-effects models. Primary (pain interference, physical function) and secondary (pain intensity, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, social participation) outcomes were obtained from the PROMIS-29 instrument. Results:We identified 660 participants with LBP (mean age = 51.6 years, 75% female). Over the 12-month study period, common IM services were IM consults (56%), acupuncture (44%), chiropractic care (24%), physical therapy (19%), and massage (17%). Over two-thirds (70%) of participants received at least one guideline-concordant nonpharmacologic treatment. Participants with follow-up outcome data (n = 443, 67%) reported a modest reduction in pain interference with life activities in the short- and long-term (2-month mean difference [MD] = -1.47, 95%CI = -2.98, -0.64; 12-month MD = -1.98, 95%CI = -3.12, -0.88). By contrast, improvements in physical function were not statistically or clinically significant (2-month MD = 0.37, 95%CI = -0.28, 1.01; 12-month MD = 0.69, 95%CI = -0.31, 1.69). At 12 months, small improvements were observed on all secondary outcomes (pain intensity, anxiety, depression, and social participation) except fatigue and sleep disturbance. Conclusions:Most patients with LBP receiving care at IM clinics received at least one guideline-recommended nonpharmacologic treatment. However, improvements on clinical outcomes were relatively small. Additional multi-site studies are needed to explore the optimal implementation approach.

Objectives: In 2023, the U.S. Veterans Health Administration convened a State of the Art meeting to evaluate the existing evidence and make recommendations for measuring the well-being of the whole person in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation. In this article, we describe findings and recommendations concerning each of these health care system functions, as well as key takeaways from the meeting as a whole. Background: There has been a growing call for health care organizations to expand their focus beyond disease-based concepts to consider both positive aspects of health and indicators of well-being that extend beyond the health domain. Yet, knowledge remains limited regarding how best to integrate these types of measurements in clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation efforts. Method: State of the Art activities were organized into 3 workstreams, each focused on a core health care system function (clinical care, health research, and population health evaluation). Drawing from existing literature on the measurement of the well-being of the whole person in the assigned health care function, workgroups evaluated the existing state of knowledge and made recommendations for future work on well-being measurement in the health care setting. Results: Cross-cutting themes included: (1) difficulty evaluating the current state of knowledge due to varied use of terminology in this literature; (2) appreciation for the value of well-being measurement in each health care function; (3) need for additional research on the use and benefits of well-being measures, including their role as predictors and moderators of health and health care outcomes; (4) importance of ensuring that measures are applicable for diverse patient groups and adequately reflect the “patient voice;” and (5) need for additional leadership investment and resource allocation to support use of these measures in the health care setting. Conclusions: Knowledge from this meeting can be applied to enhance the use and application of measurement of well-being to improve patients’ health and health care outcomes.

Background Assessing the use and effectiveness of complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies via survey can be complicated given CIH therapies are used in various locations and formats, the dosing required to have an effect is unclear, the potential health and well-being outcomes are many, and describing CIH therapies can be challenging. Few surveys assessing CIH therapy use and effectiveness exist, and none sufficiently reflect these complexities. Objective In a large-scale Veterans Health Administration (VA) quality improvement effort, we developed the “Complementary and Integrative Health Therapy Patient Experience Survey”, a longitudinal, electronic patient self-administered survey to comprehensively assess CIH therapy use and outcomes. Methods We obtained guidance from the literature, subject matter experts, and Veteran patients who used CIH therapies in designing the survey. As a validity check, we completed cognitive testing and interviews with those patients. We conducted the survey (March 2021-April 2023), inviting 15,608 Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain with a recent CIH appointment or referral identified in VA electronic medical records (EMR) to participate. As a second validity check, we compared VA EMR data and patient self-reports of CIH therapy utilization a month after survey initiation and again at survey conclusion. Results The 64-item, electronic survey assesses CIH dosing (amount and timing), delivery format and location, provider location, and payor. It also assesses 7 patient-reported outcomes (pain, global mental health, global physical health, depression, quality of life, stress, and meaning/purpose in life), and 3 potential mediators (perceived health competency, healthcare engagement, and self-efficacy for managing diseases). The survey took 17 minutes on average to complete and had a baseline response rate of 45.3%. We found high degrees of concordance between self-reported and EMR data for all therapies except meditation. Conclusions Validly assessing patient-reported CIH therapy use and outcomes is complex, but possible.

BACKGROUND:The Joint Commission recently named reduction of health care disparities and improvement of health care equity as quality and safety priorities (Leadership [LD] Standard LD.04.03.08 and National Patient Safety Goal [NPSG] Standard NPSG.16.01.01). As the largest integrated health system, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) sought to leverage these new accreditation standards to further integrate and expand existing tools and initiatives to reduce health care disparities and address health-related social needs (HRSNs).INITIATIVES AND TOOLS:A combination of existing data tools (for example, Primary Care Equity Dashboard), resource tools (for example, Assessing Circumstances and Offering Resources for Needs tool), and a care delivery approach (for example, Whole Health) are discussed as quality improvement opportunities to further integrate and expand how VHA addresses health care disparities and HRSNs. The authors detail the development timeline, building, limitations, and future plans for these tools and initiatives.COORDINATION OF INITIATIVES:Responding to new health care equity Joint Commission standards led to new implementation strategies and deeper partnerships across VHA that facilitated expanded dissemination, technical assistance activities, and additional resources for VHA facilities to meet new standards and improve health care equity for veterans. Health care systems may learn from VHA's experiences, which include building actionable data platforms, employing user-centered design for initiative development and iteration, designing wide-reaching dissemination strategies for tools, and recognizing the importance of providing technical assistance for stakeholders.FUTURE DIRECTIONS:VHA continues to expand implementation of a diverse set of tools and resources to reduce health care disparities and identify and address unmet individual veteran HRSNs more widely and effectively.

As we have advanced the concept of Whole Health (WH) in the Veterans Administration over the past 10 years, we have had the unique advantage of working in a health care system in which a wide range of WH services—ranging from acupuncture to coaching to yoga and Tai Chi to nutrition classes to peer-facilitated empowerment and skill-building groups—are fully covered by the system as part of standard medical benefits. This has given us the opportunity to evaluate both the process and the outcomes of offering this type of Whole Person care on a system-wide scale. This article will review some of the lessons learned from that ongoing evaluation process in the areas of integration of complementary/integrative health approaches as well as health coaching and peer-led groups, WH education, employee well-being, cost impacts, and whole-system transformation. This is not a systematic review, as we will touch on numerous questions and lessons learned rather than dive deeply into the literature seeking the answer to one narrower question. Hopefully the narrative review approach taken here will stimulate further discussion in the field regarding what we are learning and what we can continue to learn from this large scale innovation.

IntroductionAccurate measurement of health status is essential to assess veterans' needs and the effects of interventions directed at improving veterans' well-being. We conducted a systematic review to identify instruments that measure subjective health status, considering four components (ie, physical, mental, social or spiritual well-being). MethodsFollowing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we searched CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, JSTOR, ERIC, Social Sciences Abstracts and ProQuest in June 2021 for studies reporting on the development or evaluation of instruments measuring subjective health among outpatient populations. We assessed risk of bias with the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments tool and engaged three veteran partners to independently assess the clarity and applicability of identified instruments. ResultsOf 5863 abstracts screened, we identified 45 eligible articles that reported health-related instruments in the following categories: general health (n=19), mental health (n=7), physical health (n=8), social health (n=3) and spiritual health (n=8). We found evidence for adequate internal consistency for 39 instruments (87%) and good test-retest reliability for 24 (53%) instruments. Of these, our veteran partners identified five instruments for the measurement of subjective health (Military to Civilian Questionnaire (M2C-Q), Veterans RAND 36-Item Health Survey (VR-36), Short Form 36, Abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) and Sleep Health Scale) as clear and very applicable to veterans. Of the two instruments developed and validated among veterans, the 16-item M2C-Q considered most components of health (mental, social and spiritual). Of the three instruments not validated among veterans, only the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF considered all four components of health. ConclusionWe identified 45 health measurement instruments of which, among those reporting adequate psychometric properties and endorsed by our veteran partners, 2 instruments showed the most promise for measurement of subjective health. The M2C-Q, which requires augmentation to capture physical health (eg, the physical component score of the VR-36), and the WHOQOL-BREF, which requires validation among veterans.

Importance White individuals are the greatest users of complementary and integrative health (CIH) therapies in the general population, but this might partially be due to differences in age, health condition, and location. Identifying the nuances in racial and ethnic differences in care is one important step to addressing them. Objective To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in Veterans Affairs (VA)–covered CIH therapy use in a more nuanced manner by examining the association of 5 demographic characteristics, health conditions, and medical facility locations with those differences. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cross-sectional observational study of VA health care system users, using electronic health record and administrative data at all VA medical facilities and community-based clinics. Participants included veterans with nonmissing race and ethnicity data using VA-funded health care between October 2018 and September 2019. Data were analyzed from June 2022 to April 2023. Main Outcome and Measure Any use of VA-covered acupuncture, chiropractic care, massage therapy, yoga, or meditation/mindfulness. Results The sample consisted of 5 260 807 veterans with a mean (SD) age of 62.3 (16.4) years and was 91% male (4 788 267 veterans), 67% non-Hispanic White (3 547 140 veterans), 6% Hispanic (328 396 veterans), and 17% Black (903 699 veterans). Chiropractic care was the most used CIH therapy among non-Hispanic White veterans, Hispanic veterans, and veterans of other races and ethnicities, while acupuncture was the most commonly used therapy among Black veterans. When not accounting for the location of the VA medical facilities in which veterans used health care, Black veterans appeared more likely to use yoga and meditation than non-Hispanic White veterans and far less likely to use chiropractic care, while those of Hispanic or other race and ethnicity appeared more likely to use massage than non-Hispanic White veterans. However, those differences mostly disappeared once controlling for medical facility location, with few exceptions—after adjustment Black veterans were less likely than non-Hispanic White veterans to use yoga and more likely to use chiropractic care. Conclusions and Relevance This large-scale, cross-sectional study found racial and ethnic differences in use of 4 of 5 CIH therapies among VA health care system users when not considering their medical facility location. Given those differences mostly disappeared once medical facilities were accounted for, the results demonstrated the importance of considering facilities and residential locations when examining racial differences in CIH therapy use. Medical facilities could be a proxy for the racial and ethnic composition of their patients, CIH therapy availability, regional patient or clinician attitudes, or therapy availability.

the psychological state of parents, who are considered the primary caregivers of a sick child, can affect the child's behavior and emotions. This study analyzed the effectiveness of self-compassion training on hopelessness and resilience in the parents of children with cancer.this was an experimental study with a pre-test and post-test design and a control group. The statistical population included all parents of children with cancer hospitalized in Amir Kabir Hospital of Arak in 2020. The research sample consisted of 30 parents of children with cancer selected through convenience sampling. The participants were equally divided into experimental (n = 15) and control (n = 15) groups at random. The research instruments were the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD–RISC) and the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). The experimental group underwent eight 90 min sessions of self-compassion training on a weekly basis. Finally, the multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was employed for data analysis.the mean (±SD) of the post-test scores of hopelessness and resilience were reported 10.20 (±4.95) and 43.33 (±4.27), respectively, in the experimental group, whereas they were reported 13.78 (±4.94) and 38.73 (±4.07), respectively, in the control group. According to the results, self-compassion training had significant effects on the resilience and hopelessness of the parents of children with cancer (p < 0.01). Self-compassion training had a positive, significant effect on their resilience. It was also efficient in decreasing their hopelessness.self-compassion training improved resilience and mitigated hopelessness in the parents of children with cancer.

The Veterans Health Administration is undergoing a system-wide transformation to a Whole Person/Whole Health approach to care. The Whole Health model of care is described including early outcome data on utilization and effectiveness. The paper describes the first 10 years of this transformation and provides lessons learned during that process regarding large-scale system change.

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has made a system-wide commitment to Whole Health, an approach to healthcare that empowers and equips Veterans to take charge of their health and well-being to live their lives to the fullest.1 This commitment is in response to a recognition that our country has built a healthcare system that is effective at treating many diseases – but does not focus enough on creating and supporting health and wellbeing, and does not do very well at addressing chronic pain, depression, loneliness, and the rising rate of suicide.