MOOSEnger is a tool-enabled AI agent tailored to the Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE). MOOSE cases are specified in HIT ".i" input files; the large object catalog and strict syntax make initial setup and debugging slow. MOOSEnger offers a conversational workflow that turns natural-language intent into runnable inputs by combining retrieval-augmented generation over curated docs/examples with deterministic, MOOSE-aware parsing, validation, and execution tools. A core-plus-domain architecture separates reusable agent infrastructure (configuration, registries, tool dispatch, retrieval services, persistence, and evaluation) from a MOOSE plugin that adds HIT-based parsing, syntax-preserving ingestion of input files, and domain-specific utilities for input repair and checking. An input precheck pipeline removes hidden formatting artifacts, fixes malformed HIT structure with a bounded grammar-constrained loop, and resolves invalid object types via similarity search over an application syntax registry. Inputs are then validated and optionally smoke-tested with the MOOSE runtime in the loop via an MCP-backed execution backend (with local fallback), translating solver diagnostics into iterative verify-and-correct updates. Built-in evaluation reports RAG metrics (faithfulness, relevancy, context precision/recall) and end-to-end success by actual execution. On a 125-prompt benchmark spanning diffusion, transient heat conduction, solid mechanics, porous flow, and incompressible Navier–Stokes, MOOSEnger achieves a 0.93 execution pass rate versus 0.08 for an LLM-only baseline.

The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) is an open-source finite-element framework for building multiphysics simulation applications. Using a multiphysics environment effectively demands specialized expertise, creating a barrier for many domain scientists and engineers. MOOSEnger, developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), is a domain-specific, tool-enabled AI agent built for the MOOSE Framework. This work extends MOOSEnger with a harness focused on locally-hosted models. The harness gives the agent a full pipeline: it retrieves contextual knowledge from the MOOSE repository, validates and diagnoses the resulting input through interaction with the simulation executable environment, and extracts and stores lessons in a persistent memory. The resulting framework is demonstrated on an engineering problem from the National Reactor Innovation Center Virtual Test Bed (VTB), illustrating its potential to support realistic multiphysics simulation workflows. Additionally, the agent performance is evaluated on different categories including diffusion, Navier–Stokes, phase field, plasticity, porous media flow, solid mechanics, transient heat transfer, and reactor mesh generation. Each category consists of 25 prompts/cases. We compare MOOSEnger-Gemma4 against MOOSEnger-GPT-5.2, alongside baseline Gemma4 and GPT-5.2 without agentic capabilities. MOOSEnger-GPT-5.2 shows a slight edge, achieving a 90% success rate versus 76.5% for MOOSEnger-Gemma4. The baseline models perform far worse, at just 5% (GPT-5.2) and 0% (Gemma4), underscoring the impact of the agentic harness.

The System Analysis Module (SAM), developed at Argonne National Laboratory and by collaborators at other organizations, is for advanced non-light water reactor safety analysis. SAM aims to provide fast-running, modest-fidelity, whole-plant transient analysis capabilities that are essential for fast-turnaround design scoping and engineering analyses of advanced reactor concepts. To facilitate code development, SAM utilizes the MOOSE object-oriented application framework, its underlying finite element library, and linear and nonlinear solvers to leverage modern advanced software environments and numerical methods. SAM aims to solve tightly coupled physical phenomena, including fission reaction, heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and thermal-mechanical responses in advanced reactor structures, systems, and components with high accuracy and efficiency.This paper gives an overview of the SAM code development, including goals and functional requirements, physical models, current capabilities, verification and validation, software quality assurance, and examples of simulations for advanced nuclear reactor applications.

The development of MOOSE has kept accelerating since the last release, with over 2,100 pull requests merged over the last 30 months that involved nearly fifty contributors across close to a dozen institutions internationally. The growth in MOOSE's capabilities and downstream applications is reflected in the growth of the community. User support provided on the GitHub discussions forum has steadily increased to nearly 50 daily interactions. New simulation projects, notably to model advanced nuclear reactor and fusion devices, are driving a significant expansion of the capabilities. This paper reports on these developments, with several major released features, new physics modules, and key improvements to the user experience and simulation workflow.

The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) electromagnetics module has been developed to increase MOOSE physics module capabilities, enabling standalone and coupled computational electromagnetics within the MOOSE multiphysics ecosystem. The module is actively being utilized in the areas of plasma physics and advanced manufacturing, and it currently provides initial demonstrated capability in multi-dimensional, complex-valued electromagnetic wave propagation, electrostatic contact, reflection and transmission, and electromagnetic eigenvalue problems. Two-dimensional wave propagation and one-dimensional wave reflection and transmission are showcased as examples in this work. The modularity, parallelism, and plug-in infrastructure for custom future development is inherited from MOOSE itself, and the module can be used with both MOOSE-based and external codes, giving great flexibility.

Failure of many brittle materials and structures can be modeled using interface‐oriented finite elements combined with intrinsic cohesive zone models. The discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite element method provides an innovative framework for modeling brittle crack propagation with zero‐thickness interface elements, which can accommodate extrinsic cohesive laws to avoid the artificial compliance required in intrinsic cohesive models. However, robust formulations and implementations of DG methods are critical in alleviating the well‐known convergence issues for both crack nucleation and propagation with reduced instability. This paper presents a robust interface element formulation by modifying the incomplete interior penalty Galerkin (IIPG) method, which successfully avoids the initial element interface penetration across elements that occurs prior to crack nucleation, and thereby greatly reduces the instability issue as cracks open. We further verified and validated our implementation by using a bar tension test and a beam fracturing benchmark. The robustness of our proposed interface element method was demonstrated by a micromechanics fiber/matrix debonding problem with 64 fibers embedded in a bulk matrix.

The MOOSE Navier–Stokes module solves mass, momentum, energy, and passive scalar conservation equations in the context of fluid flow. The module supports solution of these equations in both free flow and porous medium contexts and for a range of fluid compressibility. The conservation equations can be discretized in space using continuous Galerkin finite elements or with cell centered finite volumes.

To support the reliable and resilient operation of modular reactors and microreactors, anticipatory control strategies have been proposed for achieving faster-than-real-time predictions and decision-making capabilities in anticipation of potential anomalies, including setpoint changes and cyber incidents. This work presents how anticipatory control strategies can be implemented via model predictive control (MPC) for a single heat pipe's temperature. Considering the uncertainty in developing and applying MPC, this work evaluates MPC performance given three different model forms: a linear response surface model, an artificial neural network (ANN), and an autoregressive model with exogenous input (ARX). This work also evaluates the impacts of different input biases and variance on MPC performance in order to account for potential sensor reading variations due to cyber incidents. We observe that the ANN and ARX result in more fluctuated control actions compared to the MPC with linear response surface model. However, when the cyber incidents are of large magnitudes, the linear response surface model produces smaller feasible regions than the ANN and ARX models under identical constraints.

With the next generation of nuclear reactors under development, modeling and simulation tools are being developed by the U.S. Department of Energy to support their design, licensing, and future operation. Mirroring the physical test beds currently under construction (i.e., Demonstration and Operation of Microreactor Experiments, known as DOME, and Laboratory for Operating and Testing in the United States, known as LOTUS), the Virtual Test Bed was launched by the National Reactor Innovation Center in collaboration with the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program to support the advanced reactor community. This collaborative effort, which involves multiple teams at both Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory, aims to use state-of-the-art simulation tools to model a wide range of reactor designs. These models are automatically tested to ensure their continued functionality as the tools are further developed. Examples are extensively documented, each acting as a tutorial for applying the relevant NEAMS tools to that reactor design. Currently, five advanced reactor types (with a total of 12 specific design subvariants) are simulated by a variety of models. These models range from steady-state, core multiphysics simulations to integrated plant analysis during loss-of-flow transients. To our knowledge, this is the first publicly available library of multiphysics advanced reactor models distributed with extensive documentation and maintained through continuous integration.

The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) framework is a foundational capability used by the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program to create over 15 different simulation tools for advanced nuclear reactors. Due to this ubiquity, improvements to the framework in support of modeling and simulation goals are critical to the program. These improvements can take many forms, including optimization, improved user experience, streamlined application programming interfaces (APIs), parallelism, and new capabilities. The work transcribed in this report was conducted in direct support of the simulation tools and has already been deployed. The capabilities outlined in this report include addition of Times and Positions systems, redesign of mechanical contact constraints to enable the augmented Lagrange algorithm, overhaul of the restart system, and incorporation of p-refinement in MOOSE.