The five cases of Protestant Christian practice in Indonesia and Thailand presented in this symposium are used to develop a sociology of Protestantism in Southeast Asia. A review is first undertaken of the history of Protestant missionary activity in Southeast Asia. Protestantism, it is observed, insists on the ultimate authority of the Bible. This authority has not been accepted by Southeast Asians until they have access to the Christian message in their own languages and they are motivated to adopt Christian practices as a means to confront deep crises in their lives. The establishment of Protestant Christianity has entailed the interpreting of the Christian message with reference to the non-Christian contexts in which Protestants in Southeast Asia live.
Editorial| May 01 1984 Still More on Peasant Strategies in Asian Societies: A Reply to Edwin Moise Charles F. Keyes Charles F. Keyes University of Washington Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Journal of Asian Studies (1984) 43 (3): 501–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911800071606 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Charles F. Keyes; Still More on Peasant Strategies in Asian Societies: A Reply to Edwin Moise. Journal of Asian Studies 1 May 1984; 43 (3): 501–502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911800071606 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsJournal of Asian Studies Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 19841984 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Notions of gender have a givenness for most people as they are rooted in fundamental assumptions about the underlying meaning of reality. In Buddhist Thailand, gender notions can be shown to derive from sources that formulate a Buddhist world view. In this paper it is maintained, contrary to the argument of some scholars, that Thai Buddhist culture does not relegate women to a religiously inferior status relative to men. Rather, both males and females who understand the world in Buddhist terms face the same problem of attachment to the world, although the characteristic tension between worldly attachment and orientation toward Buddhist salvation is expressed for females in gender images that are different than those for males. [gender imagery, images of women, sex roles, Buddhism, Thailand]
This collection of papers by sociologists and anthropologists focuses on the effect of tourism on the maintenance, transformation, and re-creation of ethnic boundaries. Tourism is seen as a special form of ethnic relations, particularly that form of tourism in which the cultural exoticism of the host population is the principal attraction for the tourist. This type of tourism leads to the formation of three main roles: tourist, touree, and middleman. The authors address different aspects of the marketing of ethnicity, such as the role of the state in the development of ethnic tourism; the modification and recreation of ethnic attributes and consciousness as the result of tourism; the transformation of art forms through the tourist trade; the role of the tourist agent; and the formation of ethnic stereotypes in tourist interactions.
to The and implications of aversion are explored. The effect of the on is considered, and is used to test the implications of both approaches. The the the economists on both and empirical
Although the Thai-Lao peasants living in rain-fed agricultural communities in northeastern Thailand have experienced some improvements in their socioeconomic situation as a consequence of the growth of the Thai economy since the mid-1950s, these peasants still constitute the poorest sector of the population of Thailand. Moreover, the socioeconomic position of the rural northeastern Thai populace has actually declined relative to that of the urban populace and that of the rural populace living in central Thailand. The economic disadvantageous position of Thai-Lao peasants is linked with a sense of being an ethnoregional minority within a polity that has been highly centralized since reforms instituted at the end of the nineteenth century. Much of the social action of Thai-Lao peasants with reference to the political-economic constraints on their world can be understood, as long-term research in one community reveals, as having been impelled by rational calculation aimed at improving the well being of peasant families. The ways in which peasants have assessed in practice the justice of these constraints as well as the ways in which they have assessed the limits to entrepreneurship must be seen, however, as being rooted in moral premises that Thai-Lao villagers have appropriated from Theravada Buddhism as known to them in their popular culture.
American EthnologistVolume 8, Issue 4 p. 824-825 Free Access Malaysian Mosaic: Perspectives from a Poly-Ethnic Society. JUDITH NAGATA CHARLES F. KEYES, CHARLES F. KEYES University of WashingtonSearch for more papers by this author CHARLES F. KEYES, CHARLES F. KEYES University of WashingtonSearch for more papers by this author First published: November 1981 https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1981.8.4.02a00270AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. Volume8, Issue4November 1981Pages 824-825 RelatedInformation
or "elites." He might have used "situational" approaches to ethnicity to advantage in refining his miscarried claim that "communalism is probably not more important" (p. 4) than the "neglected variables" he identifies. Finally, the book suffers from the near-universal affliction in Malaysian studies of a nonawareness of, and nonaccess to, scholarship on Malaysia produced in the centers of the United States, Canada, Britain, Australia/New Zealand, and Malaysia itself. Funston, an Australian, could have profitably used extensive UMNO and PAS materials in North American dissertations by Mansoor Marican, Stephanie Neuman, and Chu Chi Hung, to cite only a few cases. It seems a winsome hope that somehow all these geographically decentralized major labors will eventually, logically and conveniently, end up in a central library collection in Malaysia. Funston, despite four-and-a-half years of obviously diligent resident effort, apparently could locate no such place.
American AnthropologistVolume 82, Issue 2 p. 445-446 Free Access General and Theoretical: Human Nature, Class, and Ethnicity. Milton M. Gordon. Charles F. Keyes, Charles F. Keyes University of WashingtonSearch for more papers by this author Charles F. Keyes, Charles F. Keyes University of WashingtonSearch for more papers by this author First published: June 1980 https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1980.82.2.02a00640AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume82, Issue2June 1980Pages 445-446 RelatedInformation