Approved histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have low efficacy against the most commonly-diagnosed non-Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but the mechanisms underlying clinical resistance are poorly understood. Using a DLBCL cell-based model, we previously demonstrated that resistance to pan-HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) is characterized by reversible growth arrest and sensitivity by mitotic arrest and apoptosis. The goal of the current study is to better define mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance to the cytotoxic effects of HDACi by using HDAC-selective inhibitors to determine which HDACs need to be targeted to achieve the sensitive and resistant phenotypes. We find that an inhibitor selective for HDACs 1 and 2 induces G1 arrest across DLBCL cell lines used, which is consistent with the resistant phenotype. In contrast an HDAC3-selective inhibitor induces DNA damage and cytotoxicity in a cell line that is sensitive to pan-HDACi but has no effect on resistant cell lines. RNAi-mediated depletion of HDAC3 indicate the presence of a long-lived population of HDAC3 in DLBCL cell lines. Finally, doses of pan-HDACi 3-5 times higher than the IC50 established for reversible growth inhibition induce the sensitive phenotype in resistant cell lines, suggesting that resistance may be associated with failure to efficiently inhibit HDAC3. Our findings indicate that selective inhibition of HDACs 1 and 2 is associated with G1 arrest and resistance to pan-HDACi while efficient targeting of HDAC3 could be key to achieving a cytotoxic response. Thus, our work reveals a potential novel mechanism of resistance to pan-HDACi.

Since the approval of brentuximab vedotin (BV), assessment of CD30 status by immunohistochemistry gained increasing importance in the clinical management of patients diagnosed with CD30-expressing lymphomas, including classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL). Paradoxically, patients with low or no CD30 expression respond to BV. This discrepancy may be due to lack of standardization in CD30 staining methods. In this study, we examined 29 cases of CHL and 4 cases of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) for CD30 expression using a staining protocol that was designed to detect low CD30 expression levels, and an evaluation system similar to the Allred scoring system used for breast cancer evaluation. For CHL, 10% of cases had low scores and 3% were CD30 negative, with 3 cases in which the majority of tumor cells showed very weak staining. Unexpectedly, one of four cases of NLPHL was positive. We demonstrate intra-patient heterogeneity in CD30 expression levels and staining patterns in tumor cells. Three CHL cases with weak staining may have been missed without the use of control tissue for low expression. Thus, standardization of CD30 immunohistochemical staining with use of known low-expressing controls may aid in proper CD30 assessment and subsequent therapeutic stratification of patients.

Valproic acid (VPA) is a well-established therapeutic used in treatment of seizure and mood disorders as well as migraines and a known hepatotoxicant. About 50% of VPA users experience metabolic disruptions, including weight gain, hyperlipidemia, and hyperinsulinemia, among others. Several of these metabolic abnormalities are similar to the effects of circadian rhythm disruption. In the current study, we examine the effect of VPA exposure on the expression of core circadian transcription factors that drive the circadian clock via a transcription-translation feedback loop. In cells with an unsynchronized clock, VPA simultaneously upregulated the expression of genes encoding core circadian transcription factors that regulate the positive and negative limbs of the feedback loop. Using low dose glucocorticoid, we synchronized cultured fibroblast cells to a circadian oscillatory pattern. Whether VPA was added at the time of synchronization or 12h later at CT12, we found that VPA disrupted the oscillatory expression of multiple genes encoding essential transcription factors that regulate circadian rhythm. Therefore, we conclude that VPA has a potent effect on the circadian rhythm transcription-translation feedback loop that may be linked to negative VPA side effects in humans. Furthermore, our study suggests potential chronopharmacology implications of VPA usage.

Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive malignancy that has a 60 percent 5-year survival rate, highlighting a need for new therapeutic approaches. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are novel therapeutics being clinically-evaluated in combination with a variety of other drugs. However, rational selection of companion therapeutics for HDACi is difficult due to their poorly-understood, cell-type specific mechanisms of action. To address this, we developed a pre-clinical model system of sensitivity and resistance to the HDACi belinostat using DLBCL cell lines. In the current study, we demonstrate that cell lines sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of HDACi undergo early mitotic arrest prior to apoptosis. In contrast, HDACi-resistant cell lines complete mitosis after a short delay and arrest in G1. To force mitotic arrest in HDACi-resistant cell lines, we used low dose vincristine or paclitaxel in combination with belinostat and observed synergistic cytotoxicity. Belinostat curtails vincristine-induced mitotic arrest and triggers a strong apoptotic response associated with downregulated MCL-1 expression and upregulated BIM expression. Resistance to microtubule targeting agents (MTAs) has been associated with their propensity to induce polyploidy and thereby increase the probability of genomic instability that enables cancer progression. Co-treatment with belinostat effectively eliminated a vincristine-induced, actively cycling polyploid cell population. Our study demonstrates that vincristine sensitizes DLBCL cells to the cytotoxic effects of belinostat and that belinostat prevents polyploidy that could cause vincristine resistance. Our findings provide a rationale for using low dose MTAs in conjunction with HDACi as a potential therapeutic strategy for treatment of aggressive DLBCL.

The molecular mechanisms behind the transition from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are not clearly understood. This hinders development of effective therapies for treatment and prevention of NASH. In this study expression profiling data from normal, steatosis, and NASH human livers were used to predict transcription factors that are misregulated as mechanistic features of NAFLD progression. Previously-published human NAFLD gene expression profiling data from normal, steatosis, and NASH livers were subjected to transcription factor binding site enrichment analysis. Selected transcription factors that bind enriched transcription factor binding sites were analyzed for changes in expression. Distinct transcription factor binding sites were enriched in genes significantly up- or down-regulated in NASH livers. Those enriched in up-regulated genes were bound by transcription factors such as FOXA, CEBP, and HNF1 family members, while those enriched in down-regulated genes were bound by nuclear receptors involved in xenobiotic sensing and lipid metabolism. Levels of mRNA and protein for selected transcription factors were significantly changed during disease progression. The study indicates that NAFLD progression involves changes in activity or expression of transcription factors that regulate genes involved in hepatic processes known to be altered in NASH. Transcription factors such as PPAR receptors, FoxA family members, and HNF4A might be targeted therapeutically to prevent NAFLD progression.

Abstract Patients diagnosed with Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma have an overall 60% five-year survival rate. New therapeutic approaches are needed to effectively treat aggressive forms of DLBCL that are refractory to the standard treatment or that relapse within two years of treatment. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are novel therapeutics that are well tolerated in humans and are being extensively evaluated in combination with other therapeutics against hematologic malignancies. Rational selection of companion therapeutics has been difficult due to the cell type-specific mechanisms of HDACi action. In order to address this, we have developed a pre-clinical model system of sensitivity and resistance to HDACi-induced cytotoxicity in DLBCL cell lines that share characteristics with aggressive DLBCL tumors. We previously reported that HDACi resistance is associated with reversible arrest in G1 that involves sustained up-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. In the current study we demonstrate that HDACi-sensitive cell lines undergo mitotic arrest prior to anaphase in response to treatment with the approved HDACi, belinostat, consistent with activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). In contrast, HDACi-resistant cell lines are capable of completing mitosis in the presence of belinostat. To force SAC activation in HDACi resistant cell lines, we used low dose microtubule targeting agents (MTA) vincristine and paclitaxel to induce maximal mitotic arrest with minimal cytotoxicity. The combination of these low dose MTAs and belinostat efficiently caused SAC failure, mitotic slippage, and apoptosis in a synergistic manner. A key mechanism associated with resistance to MTAs is their ability to induce aneuploid cell populations that survive and undergo endoreduplication. The addition of belinostat eliminated the accumulation of a vincristine-induced aneuploid population. Pan-caspase inhibition in conjunction with belinostat and vincristine co-treatment resulted in a sustained survival of the aneuploid population. Thus belinostat triggers apoptosis in the aneuploid cells to enhance the cytotoxic effects of vincristine. Our study identifies the use of low dose MTA/HDACi combination as a potential therapeutic strategy for treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Citation Format: Aaron P. Havas, Anvi Bhakta, Kameron Rodrigues, Catharine L. Smith. Combining low dose microtubule targeting agents with belinostat potentiates cytotoxic response in HDACi resistant diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 275.

Small molecule inhibitors of lysine deacetylases (KDACs) are approved for clinical use in treatment of several diseases. Nuclear receptors, such as the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) use lysine acetyltransferases (KATs or HATs) and KDACs to regulate transcription through acetylation and deacetylation of protein targets such as histones. Previously we have shown that KDAC1 activity facilitates GR-activated transcription at about half of all cellular target genes. In the current study we examine the role of Class I KDACs in glucocorticoid-mediated repression of gene expression. Inhibition of KDACs through two structurally distinct Class I-selective inhibitors prevented dexamethasone (Dex)-mediated transcriptional repression in a gene-selective fashion. In addition, KDAC activity is also necessary to maintain repression. Steroid receptor coactivator 2 (SRC2), which is known to play a vital role in GR-mediated repression of pro-inflammatory genes, was found to be dispensable for repression of glucocorticoid target genes sensitive to KDAC inhibition. At the promoters of these genes, KDAC inhibition did not result in altered nucleosome occupancy or histone H3 acetylation. Surprisingly, KDAC inhibition rapidly induced a significant decrease in H3K4Me2 at promoter nucleosomes with no corresponding change in H3K4Me3, suggesting the activation of the lysine demethylase, LSD1/KDM1A. Depletion of LSD1 expression via siRNA restored Dex-mediated repression in the presence of KDAC inhibitors, suggesting that LSD1 activation at these gene promoters is incompatible with transcriptional repression. Treatment with KDAC inhibitors does not alter cellular levels of LSD1 or its association with Dex-repressed gene promoters. Therefore, we conclude that Class I KDACs facilitate Dex-induced transcriptional repression by suppressing LSD1 complex activity at selected target gene promoters. Rather than facilitating repression of transcription, LSD1 opposes it in these gene contexts.

Sulforaphane is a natural product found in broccoli, which is known to exert many different molecular effects in the cell, including inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes. Here, we examine for the first time the potential for sulforaphane to inhibit HDACs in HaCaT keratinocytes and compare our results with those found using HCT116 colon cancer cells. Significant inhibition of HDAC activity in HCT116 nuclear extracts required prolonged exposure to sulforaphane in the presence of serum. Under the same conditions HaCaT nuclear extracts did not exhibit reduced HDAC activity with sulforaphane treatment. Both cell types displayed down-regulation of HDAC protein levels by sulforaphane treatment. Despite these reductions in HDAC family member protein levels, acetylation of marker proteins (acetylated Histone H3, H4, and tubulin) was decreased by sulforaphane treatment. Time-course analysis revealed that HDAC6, HDAC3, and acetylated histone H3 protein levels are significantly inhibited as early as 6h into sulforaphane treatment. Transcript levels of HDAC6 are also suppressed after 48h of treatment. These results suggest that HDAC activity noted in nuclear extracts is not always translated as expected to target protein acetylation patterns, despite dramatic inhibition of some HDAC protein levels. In addition, our data suggest that keratinocytes are at least partially resistant to the nuclear HDAC inhibitory effects of sulforaphane, which is exhibited in HCT116 and other cells. (c) 2014 The Authors. Molecular Carcinogenesis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Lysine deacetylases have been known to regulate nuclear receptor function for many years. In the unliganded state, nuclear receptors that form heterodimers with retinoid X receptors, such as the retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors, associate with deacetylases to repress target genes. In the case of steroid receptors, binding of an antagonist ligand was initially reported to induce association of deacetylases to prevent activation of target genes. Since then, deacetylases have been shown to have diverse functions in steroid receptor signaling, from regulating interactions with molecular chaperones to facilitating their ability to activate transcription. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent studies on the role of deacetylases in steroid receptor signaling, which show deacetylases to be highly versatile regulators of steroid receptor function.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. While the initial treatment strategy is highly effective, relapse occurs in 40% of cases. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are a promising class of anti-cancer drugs but their single agent efficacy against relapsed DLBCL has been variable, ranging from few complete/partial responses to some stable disease. However, most patients showed no response to HDACi monotherapy for unknown reasons. Here we show that sensitivity and resistance to the hydroxamate HDACi, PXD101, can be modeled in DLBCL cell lines. Sensitivity is characterized by G2/M arrest and apoptosis and resistance by reversible G1 growth arrest. These responses to PXD101 are independent of several negative prognostic indicators such as DLBCL subtype, BCL2 and MYC co-expression, and p53 mutation, suggesting that HDACi might be used effectively against highly aggressive DLBCL tumors if they are combined with other therapeutics that overcome HDACi resistance. Our investigation of mechanisms underlying HDACi resistance showed that cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs), p21 and p27, are upregulated by PXD101 in a sustained fashion in resistant cell lines concomitant with decreased activity of the cyclin E/cdk2 complex and decreased Rb phosphorylation. PXD101 treatment results in increased association of CKI with the cyclin E/cdk2 complex in resistant cell lines but not in a sensitive line, indicating that the CKIs play a key role in G1 arrest. The results suggest several treatment strategies that might increase the efficacy of HDACi against aggressive DLBCL.

Nuclear receptors use lysine acetyltransferases and lysine deacetylases (KDACs) in regulating transcription through histone acetylation. Lysine acetyltransferases interact with steroid receptors upon binding of an agonist and are recruited to target genes. KDACs have been shown to interact with steroid receptors upon binding to an antagonist. We have shown previously that KDAC inhibitors (KDACis) potently repress the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter through transcriptional mechanisms and impair the ability of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to activate it, suggesting that KDACs can play a positive role in GR transactivation. In the current study, we extended this analysis to the entire GR transcriptome and found that the KDACi valproic acid impairs the ability of agonist-bound GR to activate about 50% of its target genes. This inhibition is largely due to impaired transcription rather than defective GR processing and was also observed using a structurally distinct KDACi. Depletion of KDAC1 expression mimicked the effects of KDACi in over half of the genes found to be impaired in GR transactivation. Simultaneous depletion of KDACs 1 and 2 caused full or partial impairment of several more GR target genes. Altogether we found that Class I KDAC activity facilitates GR-mediated activation at a sizable fraction of GR-activated target genes and that KDAC1 alone or in coordination with KDAC2 is required for efficient GR transactivation at many of these target genes. Finally, our work demonstrates that KDACi exposure has a significant impact on GR signaling and thus has ramifications for the clinical use of these drugs.

Abstract 1359 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) throughout the world. DLBCL is an aggressive, heterogeneous disease with two major recognized cell-of-origin subtypes: “germinal center” (GCB) and “activated B-cell like” (ABC), the latter having the worse prognosis. Overall, DLBCL remains fatal for about 30% patients due to relapse or lack of response to initial therapy. Resistant/relapsed DLBCL patients could benefit from the addition of new promising antiproliferative drugs, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs), to current chemotherapy regimens. So far, Vorinostat and Romidepsin, two structurally different HDACIs, have been approved for the treatment of hematological cancers. Despite their proven antiproliferative, pro-apoptotic effects, response to these drugs against DLBCL in clinical trials have been variable, ranging from complete/partial responses to stable disease to no response. The mechanisms of action of these drugs are still poorly understood, mainly because the function of their target deacetylases are cell context-specific. Therefore, characterization of the specific anticancer mechanisms of action of HDACIs in DLBCL could potentially lead to development of novel combinatorial drug regimens effective against resistant/relapsed DLBCL patients. To define HDACI action in DLBCL, we treated DLBCL-derived cell lines with PXD101, (Belinostat); a hydroxamate HDACI, like Vorinostat. We demonstrated that PXD101 is able to produce 24h growth inhibition (IC50) at submicromolar concentrations regardless of the DLBCL subtype. The 24h IC50values were used in all the subsequent experiments. Cell cycle and apoptosis analysis by flow cytometry indicated that PXD101 produces cytotoxic effects on two of the GCB cell lines; DB and OCILY19 underwent G2/M cell cycle arrest at 24 hours followed by apoptosis at 48 and 72 hours of treatment. Immunoblotting of PARP and caspase-3 cleavage further confirmed apoptosis. More importantly, when cells were treated for only 8 hours with PXD101 and then the drug was removed for 24 hours, cells showed apoptosis rates similar to those observed with 48h of continuous treatment; suggesting that once that these cell lines are exposed to the drug they rapidly commit to cell death. Thus, we have classified the DB and OCILY19 cell lines as models for sensitivity to the apoptotic effects of HDACI. In contrast, PXD101 induced cytostatic effects on the GCB cell line SUDHL4 and ABC cell lines U2932 and SUDHL8. All three cell lines showed G1 phase cell cycle arrest with little apoptosis. The G1 arrest is reversible after 48 hours of drug removal. Because of the lack of cell death and the reversibility of cell cycle arrest, we have classified these cell lines as models of HDACI resistance. Previous studies have shown that induction of p21 is responsible for G1 arrest in cells treated with HDACIs. Western blot analysis showed that none of the cell lines, except U2932, express p21, but upon PXD101, p21 protein levels were induced at 24, 48 and 72 hours of PXD101 treatment in SUDHL4 and U2932. In contrast, p21 was induced to a lesser extent in OCILY19 and DB, but its expression was not sustained beyond 24 hours of treatment. Since we also observed a corresponding loss in Rb phosphorylation, we tested the effect of PXD101 on cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) activity. This enzyme complex is responsible for entry into S phase and is inhibited by association with p21. In all three resistant cell lines CDK2 activity was reduced after only 24 hours of treatment with PXD101. The loss in activity was correlated with increased association with p21, as determined by immunoprecipitation. These results indicate that sustained upregulation of p21 by HDACIs such as PXD101 plays a role in bringing about G1 arrest that may protect DLBCL cells from apoptosis. Combined treatment with therapeutics that prevent p21 upregulation and G1 arrest may work synergistically with HDACIs to trigger apoptosis in HDACI-resistant cell lines. To that end, we have begun analysis of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, flavopiridol, and have shown that it prevents both p21 upregulation and G1 arrest in the HDACi-resistant DLBCL cell lines. Studies to measure synergism with PXD101 in bringing about cell death are currently underway. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent subtype of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) in all countries around the world and in all age groups. Several drug regimens have been used in treatment of DLBCL; however, this disease remains eventually fatal in 30 – 40% of the patients. Chemotherapy resistance can be partly explained by the fact that DLBCL is a heterogeneous group of NHLs, with the two most prevalent subtypes being “Activated B-cell Like” (ABC) and “Germinal Center B-cell like” (GCB). Patients with the ABC subtype have the poorest prognosis under the current treatment regimen. Therefore, there is a pressing need for new therapeutics that can increase survival rates in DLBCL patients. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs) have proven to be promising drugs in the treatment of blood malignancies. Even though their mechanism of action has not been fully characterized, two HDIs, (Vorinostat and Romidepsin) have been approved for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Therefore the purpose of the current study is to investigate the response of DLBCL subtypes to HDIs, with a particular focus on subtype-specific mechanisms of action. Our current working hypothesis is that a comprehensive analysis of the genomic and proteomic response to histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDIs) including gene expression and transcription factor acetylation will reveal both mechanisms and potential biomarkers of HDI action in lymphomas DLBCL. In the current study we have focused on the cellular and genomic effects of the hydroxamate HDI, Belinostat (PXD101), on cell lines representing the GCB subtype of DLBCL. We show that PXD101 inhibits growth of four GCB-type cell lines with 24 h IC50s in the low micromolar range (SUDHL6 =0.15uM, OCI Ly19 = 0.3uM, SUDHL4 = 0.45uM, DB = 0.77uM). Flow cytometry analysis has shown that three of these cell lines (SUDHL6, OCI Ly19 and DB) arrest in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle by 24 hours of treatment at the IC50 dose and then die by apoptosis. In contrast, the SUDHL4 cell line reversibly arrests in the G1 phase without undergoing cell death. Western blot analysis of PARP and caspase-3 cleavage has further confirmed the presence/absence of apoptosis. We suggest that the SUDHL4 cell line represents DLBCL tumors that are refractory to the apoptosis-inducing effects of HDIs. Thus, we are using this cell line to identify other therapeutics which could be used in combination with PXD101 to induce cell death.The mechanistic basis for the differential cellular response between the GCB type cell lines is currently under investigation using expression profiling data obtained from OCI Ly19 and SUDHL4 cells treated with PXD101. Preliminary data indicates divergent responses in expression of GADD45 and p21, the Myc/Max family of proteins, and the clock genes, Per1 and Cry2. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 597. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-597

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) have been shown to be required for basal or inducible transcription at a variety of genes by poorly understood mechanisms. We demonstrated previously that HDAC inhibition rapidly repressed transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter by a mechanism that does not require the binding of upstream transcription factors. In the current study, we find that HDACs work through the core promoter sequences of MMTV as well as those of several cellular genes to facilitate transcriptional initiation through deacetylation of nonhistone proteins.

The progesterone receptor (PR) plays a pivotal role in proper development and function of the mammary gland and has also been implicated in mammary tumorigenesis. PR is a ligand-activated transcription factor; however, relatively, little is known about its mechanisms of action at endogenous target promoters. The aim of our study was to identify a natural PR-responsive gene and investigate its transcriptional regulation in the mammary microenvironment. Our experiments revealed FKBP5 as a direct target of the PR, because it exhibited a rapid activation by progestin that was cycloheximide independent and correlated with recruitment of RNA polymerase II to the promoter. Site-directed mutagenesis and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that progestin responsiveness is mediated through a composite element in the first intron, to which the PR binds concomitantly with GATA-2. Mutational analysis of the element revealed that the GATA-2 site is essential for progestin activation. Direct binding of PR to DNA contributes to the efficiency of activation but is not sufficient, suggesting that the receptor makes important protein-protein interactions as part of its mechanism of action at the FKBP5 promoter. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays we also determined that the intronic region is in communication with the promoter, probably via DNA looping. Time course analysis revealed a cyclical pattern of PR recruitment to the FKBP5 gene but a persistent recruitment to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter, indicating that receptor cycling is a gene-specific phenomenon rather than a characteristic of the receptor itself. Our study offers new insight in the nature of PR-regulated transcription in mammary cancer cells.

examines how underlying issues, group motives, religious and cross-cultural clashes, diplomacy and imperialism, and encroaching modernity shaped this volatile region.The book's narrative and supporting documents, maps, photographs, and chronologies consider high and low politics with perspectives

Transcriptional repression and silencing have been strongly associated with hypoacetylation of histones. Accordingly, histone deacetylases, which remove acetyl groups from histones, have been shown to participate in mechanisms of transcriptional repression. Therefore, current models of the role of acetylation in transcriptional regulation focus on the acetylation status of histones and designate histone acetyltransferases, which add acetyl groups to histones, as transcriptional coactivators and histone deacetylases as corepressors. In recent years, an accumulation of studies have shown that these enzymes also target non‐histone proteins and that histone deacetylases have clear roles as coactivators at a variety of genes, some of which are key regulators of cell growth and survival. This review summarizes the evidence for histone deacetylases as coactivators and provides models of coactivation mechanisms, some of which integrate roles of acetylated histones and non‐histone proteins in transcription. BioEssays 30:15–24, 2008. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.